States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination

被引:0
|
作者
Landau, Dylan [1 ]
Kirschen, Matthew P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Greer, David [5 ]
Lewis, Ariane [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
[6] NYU, Dept Neurol, Div Neurocrit Care, Langone Med Ctr, 30 First Ave,MSB-2-206, New York, NY 10016 USA
[7] NYU, Dept Neurosurg, Div Neurocrit Care, Langone Med Ctr, 530 First Ave,MSB-2-206, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Brain death; Ethics; Medicolegal; Uniform Determination of Death Act; Advocacy; DEATH DETERMINATION; VARIABILITY; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Uniform Determination of Death Act requires brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination to be in accordance with "accepted medical standards." The medical organizations responsible for delineating these guidelines are only specified statutorily in two states. State health organizations (SHOs) are composed of policy experts and medical professionals who are responsible for addressing medical, ethical, and legislative problems related to health. We sought to evaluate information publicly available on SHO websites regarding BD/DNC.MethodsFrom December 2023 to August 2024, we searched SHO (health department, medical board, medical society, and hospital association) websites for the 48 states without statutory guidance regarding what constitutes accepted medical standards for information regarding BD/DNC using the terms "brain death," "brain stem," and "determination of death." All posts related to BD/DNC were reviewed and categorized via thematic analysis.ResultsOf the 192 SHO websites searched, there were 35 from 28 states that provided information regarding BD/DNC: 14 medical societies, 12 health departments, 8 hospital associations, and 1 medical board. Of these 35 SHOs, 12 referenced the state's legal statute, 11 referenced hospital/state/model policies or guidance, 3 referenced both legal statutes and hospital/state/model policies or guidelines, 3 referenced explicit support for standardized BD/DNC guidelines, and 6 made other mention of BD/DNC. New York was the only state with an SHO that provided clear guidance regarding accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination.ConclusionsFor most states, the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination are not identified on SHO websites or statutorily. This contributes to inconsistencies across hospital BD/DNC determination policies, leading to medical, ethical, and legal challenges. Delineation of the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination in each state could help facilitate consistency and accuracy in BD/DNC determination, prevent false positive determinations of death, and promote public trust in BD/DNC determination and the medical system overall.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Brain death worldwide: Accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria - Reply
    Wijdicks, EF
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (03) : 471 - 471
  • [42] VARIABILITY IN THE NEUROLOGIC DETERMINATION OF DEATH IN PEDIATRIC INSTITUTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
    Francoeur, Conall
    Weiss, Matthew
    MacDonald, Jennifer
    Press, Craig
    Berg, Robert
    Topjian, Alexis
    Morrison, Wynne
    Kirschen, Matthew
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 355 - 355
  • [43] USE OF VENOUS BLOOD SAMPLES IN DETERMINATION OF DEATH BY NEUROLOGIC CRITERIA IN CHILDREN
    Fathi, Alireza
    Lake, Jean
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [44] Infratentorial brain injury and death by neurologic criteria in Canada: a narrative review
    Shemie, Sam D.
    Briard, Joel Neves
    Boyd, J. Gordon
    Gofton, Tenielle
    Kramer, Andreas
    Chasse, Michael
    Taran, Shaurya
    Gros, Priti
    Singh, Jeffrey M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2023, 70 (04): : 781 - 787
  • [45] Nonconsensual Determination of Neurologic (Brain) Death Is It a Violation of Constitutional Rights?
    Rady, Mohamed Y.
    Verheijde, Joseph L.
    Yanke, Greg
    CHEST, 2017, 152 (04) : 903 - 904
  • [46] Should the Revised Uniform Determination of Death Act Address Objections to the Use of Neurologic Criteria to Declare Death?
    Ariane Lewis
    Neurocritical Care, 2022, 37 : 377 - 385
  • [47] Inconsistency between the Circulatory and the Brain Criteria of Death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act
    Molina-Perez, Alberto
    Bernat, James L.
    Ave, Anne Dalle
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 48 (05): : 422 - 433
  • [48] Should the Revised Uniform Determination of Death Act Address Objections to the Use of Neurologic Criteria to Declare Death?
    Lewis, Ariane
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2022, 37 (02) : 377 - 385
  • [49] Response to Machado re: Revisions to the Uniform Determination of Death Act and Other Controversial Aspects of the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria
    Lewis, Ariane
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2023, 38 (01) : 214 - 216
  • [50] Response to Machado re: Revisions to the Uniform Determination of Death Act and Other Controversial Aspects of the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria
    Ariane Lewis
    Neurocritical Care, 2023, 38 : 214 - 216