The Practical Otiosity of Exclusionary Reasons

被引：0

作者：

Himma, Kenneth Einar ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Law, Zagreb, Croatia

来源：

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW & JURISPRUDENCE | 2024年 / 37卷 / 02期

关键词：

law; exclusionary reasons; practical rationality; Joseph Raz;

D O I：

10.1017/cjlj.2024.21

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

One of Joseph Raz's most influential contributions to legal philosophy is the Exclusionary Thesis, according to which any prescription that counts as mandatory is identical with an exclusionary reason that bars acting on certain reasons favoring noncompliance. This essay argues that exclusionary reasons are otiose in the sense there is no deliberative work they are ever needed to do under objective norms of practical reasoning.

引用

页码：457 / 473

页数：17

共 50 条

[41] Precis to Constructing Practical Reasons
Mueller, Andreas
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2020, 74 (04): : 555 - 559
[42] Legal Directives and Practical Reasons
Adams, N. P.
MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2019,
[43] Legal Directives and Practical Reasons
Lonardo, Luigi
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE, 2020, 33 (02): : 493 - 499
[44] On believing indirectly for practical reasons
Sebastian Schmidt
Philosophical Studies, 2022, 179 : 1795 - 1819
[45] Practical Reasons and the Redundancy of Motives
Richard Norman
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2001, 4 (1) : 3 - 22
[46] Constructivism about practical reasons
James, Aaron
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 74 (02) : 302 - 325
[47] Practical steps and reasons for action
Clark, P
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1997, 27 (01) : 17 - 45
[48] Practical reasons and reality of morals
Ernst, Gerhard
DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 2009, 57 (02): : 333 - 337
[49] The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons
Portmore, Douglas W.
MIND, 2011, 120 (477) : 117 - 153
[50] In Defense of Practical Reasons for Belief
Leary, Stephanie
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2017, 95 (03) : 529 - 542

← 1 2 3 4 5 →