A retrospective, single-centre safety audit of the Altis® single incision sling in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence

被引:0
|
作者
Collier, E. [1 ]
Housmans, S. [2 ]
van der Aa, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] UZ Leuven, Dept Urol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] UZ Leuven, Dept Gynaecol, Leuven, Belgium
来源
CONTINENCE | 2025年 / 13卷
关键词
Safety audit; Altis (R) single incision sling; Stress urinary incontinence; MINI-SLINGS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cont.2024.101741
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Single incision slings (SIS) and adjustable single incision slings (ASIS) are the latest generation of midurethral slings (MUS), used for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, that seek to minimize the morbidity and complications associated to the conventional retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Its use has recently come under scrutiny following concerns about long-term complications. Aims: We conducted an internal audit of the short-to-medium term safety and absence of reported complications of the Altis (R) SIS in our medical centre (University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium). Secondary outcome was treatment efficacy, defined as no self-reported SUI symptoms. Methods: A file review of all patients implanted with an Altis (R) sling at our institution between 2014 and May 2021 was performed. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were reported with the use of descriptive statistics. Results: 212 women were included in our safety analysis, 192 women in the efficacy analysis. The safety analysis showed 74 complications of any kind. Mesh exposure occurred in 16 women (7.5%) after a mean period of 15 months. Eleven of them (5.2%) underwent excision of the exposed mesh. Arterial haemorrhage requiring embolization, and mesh infection, both occurred once. Dyspareunia for the patient (3.3%) or her partner (1.4%) was encountered in nine cases. Four cases were linked to mesh exposure, of which three underwent partial sling excision. De novo urgency (5.7%) and urge incontinence (7.3%) were reported in 25 women (13%) and were managed with anticholinergic drugs. Regarding efficacy outcomes, 161 women (83.8%) reported no residual urine loss at the first post-operative consultation. Thirteen women (6.7%) had persistent SUI. Eight women (4.2%) underwent reintervention receiving a second sling. Conclusion: We can conclude that the short-to-medium term results in our centre align with those reported in existing literature.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PATIENT SATISFACTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SINGLE INCISION MINI-SLING (ALTIS®) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FEMALE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Hanson, Craig
    Erickson, Ty
    Mccrery, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E516 - E517
  • [22] Single Incision Mid-urethral Sling for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Nitti, Victor W.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (02)
  • [23] A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE TRIAL ON THE AJUST: A NEW SINGLE INCISION SLING FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMALE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Meschia, M.
    Barbacini, P.
    Ricci, L.
    Pifarotti, P.
    Baccichet, R.
    Maffiolini, M.
    Braghin, C.
    Spreafico, L.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 (06) : 1035 - 1036
  • [24] EXPERINCE WITH THE MINIARC™ SINGLE INCISION SLING SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Pickens, R.
    Doggweiler, R.
    Klein, L.
    Mobley, J.
    White, W.
    Klein, F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 : S324 - S325
  • [25] EXPERINCE WITH THE MINIARC™ SINGLE INCISION SLING SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Pickens, R.
    Doggweiler, R.
    Klein, L.
    Mobley, J.
    White, W.
    Klein, F.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 (06) : 1128 - 1129
  • [26] MINIARC SINGLE-INCISION SLING FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Vaish, Sneha
    Thompson, Jannah
    Sutherland, Suzette
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (02) : 266 - 266
  • [27] Safety and Efficacy of Single Incision Sling Versus Midurethral Sling in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Huser, Martin
    Hudecek, Robert
    Belkov, Ivan
    Horvath, Ivan
    Jarkovsky, Jiri
    Tvarozek, Samuel
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (05) : 275 - 276
  • [28] Safety and Efficacy of Single Incision Sling Versus Midurethral Sling in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Huser, Martin
    Hudecek, Robert
    Belkov, Ivan
    Horvath, Ivan
    Jarkovsky, Jiri
    Tvarozek, Samuel
    UROGYNECOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02): : 113 - 120
  • [29] SINGLE-INCISION SLING IN MANAGEMENT OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A16 - A16
  • [30] MINIARC SINGLE-INCISION SLING FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Sutherland, S. E.
    Thompson, J. H.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 : S230 - S231