Developing a toolkit to support parents' involvement in child death review: an experience-based co-design study

被引:1
|
作者
Garstang, Joanna Jane [1 ,2 ]
Spry, Jenna [3 ,4 ]
Routledge, Gayle [5 ]
Pease, Anna [6 ]
Shaw, Karen L. [7 ]
Kenyon, Sara [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Children & Families Div, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[5] Child Mine, Stafford, England
[6] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
关键词
Mortality; Palliative Care; Health services research; Paediatrics; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2024-327642
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Understanding why children die is important for grieving parents and for informing system improvements aimed at prevention and future care. Many countries have child death review (CDR) process, but little is known about how best to engage parents. The aim of this study was to use experience-based co-design to create a toolkit to support parental involvement in CDR.Methods A survey of English paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and palliative care services explored practices and identified a diverse sample of sites for professional interviews. Bereaved parents were recruited through charities, hospitals and social media. Semistructured interviews were held with parents and professionals followed by co-design workshops to develop the toolkit.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Results There were 29 survey responses, 13 out of 21 from PICUs and 16 out of 34 from palliative care. 21 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals were interviewed. 23 bereaved parents of children who died aged 0-18 years in 2021-2022, either during hospital admission or under palliative care were, interviewed. 10 parents and 23 professionals participated in co-design meetings. Key emotional touchpoints identified from parents' experiences were: becoming aware of CDR meetings, being asked for input, knowing the date and receiving feedback. All agreed on the importance of involving parents, with clear communication, and need for resources and training for key workers. The toolkit includes training videos, a standardised pathway including template letters, feedback form, easy-read leaflet and an animation explaining the importance of involving parents.Conclusions Co-design has successfully supported the development of a toolkit of resources in a sensitive area. It required considerable support from bereavement support organisations and researchers. Future evaluation is required.Trial registration number ISRCTN14790455.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study
    Anemaat, Lisa
    Palmer, Victoria J.
    Copland, David A.
    Binge, Geoffrey
    Druery, Kent
    Druery, Julia
    Mainstone, Kathryn
    Aisthorpe, Bruce
    Wallace, Sarah J.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [32] DEVELOPING A PSYCHOSEXUAL INTERVENTION AND TREATMENT MODEL FOR PEOPLE WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND SEXUAL DIFFICULTIES USING THEORY AND EXPERIENCE-BASED CO-DESIGN
    Brown, Ashley
    Bullock, Amelia
    Scott, Whitney
    Rahman, Qazi
    Adanijo, Abi
    Schmill, Pooja
    Moss-Morris, Rona
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2024, 86 (05): : A18 - A18
  • [33] An experience-based co-design to accomplish person-centered self-care support for elderly persons with heart failure
    Nygardh, A.
    Martensson, J.
    Allemann, H.
    Stromberg, A.
    Aidemark, J.
    Fruberg, C.
    Karlsson, J-E
    Askenas, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2015, 14 : S51 - S52
  • [34] Using experience-based co-design to develop mobile/tablet applications to support a person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation
    Marwaa M.N.
    Guidetti S.
    Ytterberg C.
    Kristensen H.K.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)
  • [35] Implementing bedside handovers in mental health care: Insights from an experience-based co-design
    Van de Velde, Ellen
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Eeckloo, Kristof
    Malfait, Simon
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 119
  • [36] Improving training in paediatric total intravenous anaesthesia using experience-based co-design methodology
    Brooks, P.
    Dunn, J.
    Breeze, J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 : 13 - 13
  • [37] Designing Health and Fitness Apps with Older Adults: Examining the Value of Experience-Based Co-Design
    Harrington, Christina N.
    Wilcox, Lauren
    Connelly, Kay
    Rogers, Wendy
    Sanford, Jon
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EAI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR HEALTHCARE (PERVASIVEHEALTH 2018), 2018, : 15 - 24
  • [38] Evidence-informed, experience-based co-design: a novel framework integrating research evidence and lived experience in priority-setting and co-design of health services
    Morley, Claire
    Jose, Kim
    Hall, Sonj E.
    Shaw, Kelly
    McGowan, Deirdre
    Wyss, Martina
    Winzenberg, Tania
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08): : 1 - 6
  • [39] Older adult and family caregiver preferences for emergency department based-palliative care: An experience-based co-design study
    Wright, Rebecca
    Lowton, Karen
    Hansen, Bryan R.
    Grocott, Patricia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2021, 3
  • [40] Improving intermittent auscultation: Launch of Listen2Baby, a national study using experience-based co-design
    Rowe, Rachel
    Ade, Mo
    Fitzsimons, Bev
    Joash, Karen
    Kenyon, Sara
    Maclellan, Jennifer
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 38 - 39