Machine Learning Models Integrating Dietary Indicators Improve the Prediction of Progression from Prediabetes to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Zhuoyang [1 ]
Li, Yuqian [2 ]
Mao, Zhenxing [1 ]
Wang, Chongjian [1 ]
Hou, Jian [1 ]
Zhao, Jiaoyan [1 ]
Wang, Jianwei [1 ]
Tian, Yuan [1 ]
Li, Linlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
关键词
type 2 diabetes mellitus; prediabetes; diet; machine learning; prediction model; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/nu17060947
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Diet plays an important role in preventing and managing the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to develop prediction models incorporating specific dietary indicators and explore the performance in T2DM patients and non-T2DM patients. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 2215 patients from the Henan Rural Cohort. The key variables were selected using univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Multiple predictive models were constructed separately based on dietary and clinical factors. The performance of different models was compared and the impact of integrating dietary factors on prediction accuracy was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive performance. Meanwhile, group and spatial validation sets were used to further assess the models. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to identify key factors influencing the progression of T2DM. Results: Nine dietary indicators were quantitatively collected through standardized questionnaires to construct dietary models. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model outperformed the other three models in T2DM prediction. The area under the curve (AUC) and F1 score of the dietary model in the validation cohort were 0.929 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.916-0.942] and 0.865 (95%CI 0.845-0.884), respectively. Both were higher than the traditional model (AUC and F1 score were 0.854 and 0.779, respectively, p < 0.001). SHAP analysis showed that fasting plasma glucose, eggs, whole grains, income level, red meat, nuts, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and age were key predictors of the progression. Additionally, the calibration curves displayed a favorable agreement between the dietary model and actual observations. DCA revealed that employing the XGBoost model to predict the risk of T2DM occurrence would be advantageous if the threshold were beyond 9%. Conclusions: The XGBoost model constructed by dietary indicators has shown good performance in predicting T2DM. Emphasizing the role of diet is crucial in personalized patient care and management.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of Machine Learning Classification Models for the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis Approach
    Olusanya, Micheal O.
    Ogunsakin, Ropo Ebenezer
    Ghai, Meenu
    Adeleke, Matthew Adekunle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [22] Machine Learning Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zheqing
    Yang, Luqian
    Han, Wentao
    Wu, Yaoyu
    Zhang, Linhui
    Gao, Chun
    Jiang, Kui
    Liu, Yun
    Wu, Huiqun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03)
  • [23] The correlation between proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and adiponectin in the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Gu, Jun-Xu
    Wang, Kun
    Zhang, Ai-Min
    Yin, Yue
    Li, Shan-Shan
    Zhang, Na
    Qin, Li
    Wang, Chun-Yan
    Pei, Lin
    Jia, Mei
    Su, Ming
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [24] Application of machine learning algorithm incorporating dietary intake in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Ding, Tianze
    Liu, Peijie
    Jia, Jie
    Wu, Hui
    Zhu, Jie
    Yang, Kefeng
    ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2024, 13 (12)
  • [25] Building Risk Prediction Models for Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Xie, Zidian
    Nikolayeva, Olga
    Luo, Jiebo
    Li, Dongmei
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2019, 16
  • [26] Extracting New Temporal Features to Improve the Interpretability of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction Models
    Kocbek, Simon
    Kocbek, Primoz
    Gosak, Lucija
    Fijacko, Nino
    Stiglic, Gregor
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [27] Emerging risk factors improve prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Rafalson, Lisa
    Donahue, Richard P.
    Dmochowski, Jacek
    Rejman, Karol
    Stranges, Saverio
    Trevisan, Maurizio
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (08) : E229 - E229
  • [28] Prediction Models for Type 2 Diabetes Progression: A Systematic Review
    Nazirun, Nor Nisha Nadhira
    Wahab, Asnida Abdul
    Selamat, Ali
    Fujita, Hamido
    Krejcar, Ondrej
    Kuca, Kamil
    Seng, Gan Hong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 161595 - 161619
  • [29] Differential Circulating miRNA Reveal Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Progression from Prediabetes to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Roy, Dipayan
    Modi, Anupama
    Purohit, Purvi
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2021, 116 : 27 - 27
  • [30] Differential effect of interventions in patients with prediabetes stratified by a machine learning-based diabetes progression prediction model
    Zou, Xiantong
    Luo, Yingying
    Huang, Qi
    Zhu, Zhanxing
    Li, Yufeng
    Zhang, Xiuying
    Zhou, Xianghai
    Ji, Linong
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (01): : 97 - 107