Unpredictable Repeated Stress in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Shifted the Immune Response against a Fish Parasite

Simple Summary The aquaculture industry is a major contributor to the supply of animal proteins. Parasitic diseases like the white sport disease caused by Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (ich) is a significant threat to fish production and welfare. Previous studies explored the fish immune response against ich. However, the effects of farming procedures such as fish handling were not studied in the context of white spot disease. Our studies investigated the impact of handling procedures (air exposure, chasing, transfer) on the fish's ability to fight the parasite compared to non-handled fish. The results indicated that the stress caused by handling did not change the amount of parasite detected in the fish, in the tank's water, or the fish's mortality. Nonetheless, several parameters of the fish immune response were significantly altered due to the handling procedures. Overall, our results suggested that the handling procedures investigated did not impair the fish's ability to fight the parasite.Abstract Farmed fish are regularly subjected to various stressors due to farming practices, and their effect in the context of a disease outbreak is uncertain. This research evaluated the effects of unpredictable repeated stress in rainbow trout challenged with the ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, known to cause white spot disease in freshwater fish. Before and after the pathogen exposure, fish were handled with a random rotation of three procedures. At 7 days post-infection (dpi), the parasite burden was evaluated in fish and in the tank's water, and the local and systemic immune responses were investigated in the gill and spleen, respectively. The fish mortality was recorded until 12 dpi, when all the fish from the infected groups died. There was no statistical difference in parasite burden (fish and tank's water) and infection severity between the two infected fish groups. The immune gene expression analysis suggested a differential immune response between the gill and the spleen. In gills, a T helper cell type 2 immune response was initiated, whereas in spleen, a T helper cell type 1 immune response was observed. The stress has induced mainly upregulations of immune genes in the gill (cat-1, hep, il-10) and downregulations in the spleen (il-2, il-4/13a, il-8). Our results suggested that the unpredictable repeated stress protocol employed did not impair the fish immune system.