Sustainability index for eco-friendly cattle farming in dry climate regions

被引:0
|
作者
Simamora, T. [1 ,2 ]
Rofiq, M. N. [2 ]
Hutahaean, L. [2 ]
Sio, S. [1 ]
Hutapea, R. [2 ]
Irawan, D. [2 ]
Suryani [2 ]
Diastuti, R. [2 ]
Thiyas, U. N. [2 ]
Correia, B. A. [3 ]
Correia, L. T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Timor Univ, Fac Agr Sci & Hlth, Anim Husb Study Program, Kefamenanu, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assessm, Cent Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Timor Lorosae Natl Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr, Dili, Timor-Leste
关键词
Dry climate; Eco-friendly; Multidimensional scaling (MDS); Sustainability assessment; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.22034/gjesm.2024.10.SI.18
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cattle farming is an important pillar of dry climate agriculture. Cattle farming has even become the main engine of the community's economy. Currently, there are significant obstacles in the implementation of ecological, economic, technological, and infrastructural dimensions, alongside legal and institutional frameworks, that are essential for promoting sustainable livestock farming practices. Specific studies on different dimensional attributes affecting the sustainability of beef cattle are required. The objective of this study is to investigate different factors within four dimensions that affect the sustainability of cattle farming practices in dry climatic conditions.<br /> METHODS: This study was conducted using an interview approach to respondents using a questionnaire or list of questions. The questionnaire contains questions on 37 dimensional attributes, including ten environmental, ten economic, ten technological and infrastructure attributes, and seven legal and institutional attributes. A range of responses was collected from individuals engaged in livestock management in the dry climatic conditions of Timor Tengah Utara Regency. The data that has been collected is analyzed employing Multidimensional Scaling and expedited appraisal software. To evaluate sustainability and leverage attributes, Monte Carlo analysis and the alternating least squares algorithm are applied.<br /> FINDINGS: The study's outcomes revealed that the sustainability index pertaining to beef cattle farming in dry climates recorded an average score of 53.09 percent. This finding is based on the economic dimension of 45.58 percent, the environmental dimension of 54.18 percent, the technology and infrastructure dimension of 35.15 percent, and the legal and institutional dimension of 77.46 percent. The sustainability index, reflecting the technology and infrastructure aspects, ranks the lowest, primarily because the technological advancements necessary for achieving sustainable livestock farming are still underdeveloped. The availability of livestock waste processing technology is still relatively low and has not been processed optimally. This situation has an impact on the environment.<br /> CONCLUSION: The sustainability index of dry climate beef cattle farming is greatly influenced by the attributes of technology and infrastructure dimensions. The enhancement of sustainability in the future necessitates careful consideration of specific factors, including the accessibility of waste and product processing technologies, advancements in information technology, and the development of road infrastructure. Attributes in the legal and institutional dimensions are the main factors supporting beef cattle's sustainability. Optimizing extension services by increasing the number of livestock extension workers is crucial in accelerating the dissemination of eco-friendly livestock technology and innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 302
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing sustainability: chitosan biopolymers with Ag nanoparticles for eco-friendly applications in food packaging
    Chandran, Sharmila
    Pricillia, Arthi
    Natarajan, Arunadevi
    Venkatesan, Geetha
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024,
  • [42] The eco-friendly burger Could cultured meat improve the environmental sustainability of meat products?
    Tuomisto, Hanna L.
    EMBO REPORTS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [43] Tapping the Role of Microbial Biosurfactants in Pesticide Remediation: An Eco-Friendly Approach for Environmental Sustainability
    Raj, Aman
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Dames, Joanna Felicity
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [44] Navigating sustainability: challenges and opportunities in eco-friendly paint manufacturing practices in Portuguese industries
    Rita de Cássia Mendonça Sales-Contini
    Renan Paula Ramos Moreno
    Rafael Resende Lucas
    Naiara Poli Veneziani Sebbe
    Francisco José Gomes da Silva
    Thiago Edwiges
    Discover Sustainability, 6 (1):
  • [45] Towards Sustainability: An Eco-Friendly Approach for Durable Anti-Icing Superhydrophobic Surfaces
    Pradhan, Reshab
    Grewal, Harpreet Singh
    SMALL METHODS, 2024, 8 (12):
  • [46] Eco-friendly geopolymer materials: A review of performance improvement, potential application and sustainability assessment
    Zhao, Jihui
    Tong, Liangyu
    Li, Boen
    Chen, Tianhao
    Wang, Chunpeng
    Yang, Gangqiang
    Zheng, Ye
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 307
  • [47] Eco-Friendly Composite Materials: Enhancing Sustainability with Sugarcane Bagasse Biochar and Polystyrene Resin
    Kingsley O. Iwuozor
    Sulyman Age Abdulkareem
    Mubarak A. Amoloye
    Ebuka Chizitere Emenike
    Abdelrahman O. Ezzat
    Jamiu Ajibola Mustapha
    Abel U. Egbemhenghe
    Adewale George Adeniyi
    Sugar Tech, 2024, 26 : 408 - 421
  • [48] Does overseas eco-friendly innovation collaboration matter for environmental quality sustainability in India?
    Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq
    Mahalik, Mantu Kumar
    OPEC ENERGY REVIEW, 2022, 46 (02) : 250 - 284
  • [49] Intensive farming better than eco-friendly agriculture - allowing more land for natural habitats
    不详
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2022, 124 (1477): : 21 - 22
  • [50] Utilization of fruit and vegetable waste as an alternative feed resource for sustainable and eco-friendly sheep farming
    Sahoo, A.
    Sarkar, Srobana
    Lal, B.
    Kumawat, Pankaj
    Sharma, Shivendra
    De, Kalyan
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 128 : 232 - 242