Effects of end-effector robotic arm reach training with functional electrical stimulation for chronic stroke survivors

被引:0
|
作者
Cho, Ki Hun [1 ]
Hong, Mi Ran [2 ]
Song, Won-Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Natl Univ Transportat, Dept Phys Therapy, Jeungpyeong, South Korea
[2] Natl Rehabil Ctr, Natl Rehabil Res Inst, Dept Rehabil & Assist Technol, 58 Samgaksan Ro, Seoul 01022, South Korea
关键词
Chronic stroke; functional electrical stimulation; motor recovery; robotics; upper-extremity; REHABILITATION; RECOVERY; THERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/10749357.2024.2409595
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Upper-extremity dysfunction significantly affects dependence in the daily lives of stroke survivors, limiting their participation in the social environment and reducing their quality of life. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of end-effector robotic arm reach training (RAT) with functional electrical stimulation (FES) on upper-limb motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 28 chronic stroke survivors were randomized to receive RAT-with-FES and RAT-without-FES for 40 min/day, three times per week over a 4-week period, and the data of 26 participants were used in the final analysis. Upper-limb motor recovery was measured using the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), and kinematics (movement time, speed, and distance) during reaching movements toward targets placed in three directions (ipsilateral, median, and contralateral sides) were measured using a robotic arm. Results: The upper-limb motor recovery (FMA and kinematics) improvement for the within-group comparisons tended to be greater in the RAT-with-FES group than in the RAT-without-FES group. However, in the between-group comparison, no significant differences were found in FMA, and significant differences were observed only for 2 distance parameters of kinematic factors: total (23.0% vs. 1.7%) and straight total (25.5% vs. 2.6%) distance on the ipsilateral side (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study was unable to clearly reveal the positive effects of electrical stimulation combined with robotic arm training. However, we believe that it provides basic data that furthers our understanding of the role of hybrid neuroprostheses in stroke rehabilitation and the factors determining successful treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effects of Upper-Limb Training Assisted with an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Robotic Hand on Chronic Stroke
    Nam, Chingyi
    Rong, Wei
    Li, Waiming
    Xie, Yunong
    Hu, Xiaoling
    Zheng, Yongping
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [32] A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
    Milot, Marie-Helene
    Spencer, Steven J.
    Chan, Vicky
    Allington, James P.
    Klein, Julius
    Chou, Cathy
    Bobrow, James E.
    Cramer, Steven C.
    Reinkensmeyer, David J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 10
  • [33] A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
    Marie-Hélène Milot
    Steven J Spencer
    Vicky Chan
    James P Allington
    Julius Klein
    Cathy Chou
    James E Bobrow
    Steven C Cramer
    David J Reinkensmeyer
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10
  • [34] Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation and Robotic Assistance for Wrist Motion Training after Stroke: Preliminary Results
    Cazenave, Lucille
    Yurkewich, Aaron
    Hohler, Chiara
    Keller, Thierry
    Krewer, Carmen
    Jahn, Klaus
    Hirche, Sandra
    Endo, Satoshi
    Burdet, Etienne
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS, ICORR, 2023,
  • [35] Robotic rehabilitation for end-effector device and botulinum toxin in upper limb rehabilitation in chronic post-stroke patients: an integrated rehabilitative approach
    Teresa Paolucci
    Francesco Agostini
    Massimiliano Mangone
    Andrea Bernetti
    Letizia Pezzi
    Vitalma Liotti
    Elena Recubini
    Cristina Cantarella
    Rosa Grazia Bellomo
    Carlo D’Aurizio
    Raoul Saggini
    Neurological Sciences, 2021, 42 : 5219 - 5229
  • [36] Robotic rehabilitation for end-effector device and botulinum toxin in upper limb rehabilitation in chronic post-stroke patients: an integrated rehabilitative approach
    Paolucci, Teresa
    Agostini, Francesco
    Mangone, Massimiliano
    Bernetti, Andrea
    Pezzi, Letizia
    Liotti, Vitalma
    Recubini, Elena
    Cantarella, Cristina
    Bellomo, Rosa Grazia
    D'Aurizio, Carlo
    Saggini, Raoul
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 42 (12) : 5219 - 5229
  • [37] Therapeutic effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait, motor recovery, and motor cortex in stroke survivors
    Shendkar, C. V.
    Lenka, P. K.
    Biswas, Abhishek
    Kumar, Ratnesh
    Mahadevappa, M.
    HONG KONG PHYSIOTHERAPY JOURNAL, 2015, 33 (01) : 10 - 20
  • [38] Automating Grape Thinning: Predicting Robotic Arm End-effector Positions Using Depth Sensing Technology and Neural Networks
    Buayai, Prawit
    Tan, Yin Suan
    Bin Kamarudzaman, Muhammad Faris
    Makino, Koji
    Nishizaki, Hiromitsu
    Mao, Xiaoyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, METROAGRIFOR, 2023, : 76 - 80
  • [39] Muscle Electrical Impedance Properties and Activation Alteration After Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Cycling Training for Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Longitudinal Pilot Study
    Hu, Chengpeng
    Wang, Tong
    Leung, Kenry W. C.
    Li, Le
    Tong, Raymond Kai-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [40] Effects of the addition of functional electrical stimulation to ground level gait training with body weight support after chronic stroke
    Prado-Medeiros, Christiane L.
    Sousa, Catarina O.
    Souza, Andrea S.
    Soares, Marcio R.
    Barela, Ana M. F.
    Salvini, Tania F.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 15 (06) : 436 - 444