Effect of intercropping and zinc management on weed density and fodder yield in oats

被引:0
|
作者
Porwal, Muskan [1 ]
Kantwa, S. R. [2 ]
Singh, S. S. [1 ]
Govindasamy, Prabhu [2 ,3 ]
Verma, Badal [4 ]
Ramakrishnan, Srinivasan
机构
[1] Rani Lakshmi Bai Cent Agr Univ, Jhansi 284003, India
[2] ICAR Indian Grassland & Fodder Res Inst, Jhansi 284003, India
[3] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[4] Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482004, India
关键词
Green Fodder Yield; Intercropping; Nano zinc; Nutrient management; AVENA-SATIVA L;
D O I
10.59515/rma.2024.v45.i1.24
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A study was conducted to investigate the effect of intercropping and zinc application on weed density and forage yield in the Bundelkhand region during the Rabi season of 2020-2021 at the Research Farm of Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi. The experiment comprised eight treatments with sole cropping of oat (CS1) and intercropping of oat with berseem (CS2)] in the main plot and four nutrient management practices [control (NM1), recommended dose of fertilizers RDF (NM2), recommended dose of fertilizers with zinc sulfate (NM3) and recommended dose of fertilizers with nano zinc (NM4)] in sub-plots in split plot design. The results showed that the weed density (150 m(-2)) and weed biomass (26.1 g m(-2)) in CS2 was found significantly lower than CS1 (186 m(-2) and 34.5 g m(-2), respectively). NM4 treatment had significantly lower weed density (158 m(-2)) and weed biomass (25.6 g m(-2)) than NM3 (215 m(-2) and 45.13 g m(-2)) and NM2 (175 m(-2) and 25.6 g m(-2)) among nutrient management practices. Also, intercropping + RDFnZn treatment produced significantly the highest green fodder yield (57.3 t ha(-1)) when compared to the rest of the treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Rathore, Deepak Kumar
    Singh, Magan
    Kumar, Parveen
    Khippal, Anil
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2016, 39 (02) : 262 - 267
  • [12] The effect of intercropping Lablab purpureus L. with sorghum on yield and chemical composition of fodder
    Shehu, Y
    Alhassan, WS
    Pal, UR
    Phillips, CJC
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1999, 183 (02): : 73 - 79
  • [13] EFFECT OF DOSE AND TIME OF ATRAZINE APPLICATION ON WEED INFESTATION AND YIELD OF FODDER SORGHUM
    HARIKA, AS
    TOMER, PS
    GANGULY, TK
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1986, 107 : 449 - 451
  • [14] FODDER YIELD OF OATS IN RELATION TO SEED RATE AND NITROGEN LEVEL
    RAGHAVAIAH, CV
    KHAN, MS
    RAO, YY
    REDDY, N
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1979, 24 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [15] EFFECT OF WEED REMOVAL ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT-UPTAKE IN PIGEONPEA AND BLACKGRAM INTERCROPPING
    TEWARI, AN
    TIWARI, KN
    SINGH, KK
    TEWARI, US
    SHARMA, JK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1990, 35 (04) : 341 - 345
  • [16] Effects of intercropping on weeds and weed management
    Maina, JM
    Drennan, DSH
    Chweya, JA
    SECOND INTERNATIONAL WEED CONTROL CONGRESS - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 749 - 759
  • [17] Benefits to yield and profits of garlic and beet intercropping under three weed management epochs
    Mueller, S
    Durigan, JC
    Banzatto, DA
    Kreuz, CL
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1998, 33 (08) : 1361 - 1373
  • [18] EFFECT OF TIME AND AMOUNT OF 1ST IRRIGATION ON THE ROOT DISTRIBUTION AND FODDER YIELD OF OATS
    SHARMA, BR
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1987, 108 : 299 - 303
  • [19] Optimization of weed suppression, yield and quality in an intercropping system
    Baumann, DT
    Bastiaans, L
    Kropff, MJ
    12TH EWRS (EUROPEAN WEED RESEARCH SOCIETY) SYMPOSIUM 2002, WAGENINGEN, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 12 - 13
  • [20] Growth and yield performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa) grown under different nutrient management practices
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Singh, Magan
    Yadav, M. R.
    Makarana, Govind
    Kushwaha, Manish
    Dutta, Susanta
    Bhattacharjee, S.
    Rajesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 92 (02): : 267 - 272