Improving laboratory turnaround times in clinical settings: A systematic review of the impact of lean methodology application

被引:0
|
作者
Cherie, Negesse [1 ]
Berta, Dereje Mengesha [2 ]
Tamir, Mebratu [3 ]
Yiheyis, Zufan [3 ]
Angelo, Abiy Ayele [4 ]
Tarekegn, Amare Mekuanint [5 ]
Chane, Elias [5 ]
Nigus, Mesele [1 ]
Teketelew, Bisrat Birke [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed, Dept Qual Assurance & Lab Management, Gondar, Ethiopia
[2] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed & Lab Sci, Dept Hematol & Immunohematol, Gondar, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed & Lab Sci, Dept Med Parasitol, Gondar, Ethiopia
[4] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed & Lab Sci, Dept Immunol & Mol Biol, Gondar, Ethiopia
[5] Univ Gondar, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Biomed & Lab Sci, Dept Clin Chem, Gondar, Ethiopia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 10期
关键词
TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM; QUALITY; PRINCIPLES; IMPLEMENTATION; WORKFLOW; THINKING; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0312033
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Lean methodology, originally developed in the manufacturing sector, is a process management philosophy focused on maximizing value by eliminating waste. Its application in laboratory settings, particularly concerning laboratory turnaround times (TAT), involves a systematic approach to identifying inefficiencies and optimizing processes to enhance value for end customers.Methods This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with identification number (CRD42024552350) and reported based on the 2020 PRISMA checklist. An extensive search strategy was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases and gray literatures. Advanced searching was used using Boolean operators (AND & OR). After articles were exported to endnote x8, duplications were removed and articles were selected based on titles, abstracts, and full texts. The illegibility of the articles was independently assessed by the three authors (NC, DMB, and BBT), and the disagreements were settled through scientific consensus. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklist.Discussion In this review, electronic databases search yielded 1261 articles, of which 7 met the inclusion criteria. The review demonstrated, implementation of lean principle into the routine laboratory testing had an overall impact 76.1% on reducing laboratory TAT. Transportation, manual data processing, inefficient workflow, and the heavy workload were identified as the main wasteful procedures. To eliminate these non-value-added steps, several intervention techniques were implemented, including the use of a barcoding system, process redesign, workflow optimization, hiring additional staff, and relocating the sample collection room closer to the result distribution center. Lean implementation is crucial in the medical laboratory industry for optimizing processes, reducing TAT, and ultimately enhancing customer satisfaction. As a result, all clinical laboratories should adopt and implement lean principles in their routine testing processes. The medical laboratory industry should also proactively look for and apply lean tools, provide ongoing training, and foster awareness among laboratory staffs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of lean six sigma process improvement methodology on cardiac catheterization laboratory efficiency
    Agarwal, Shikhar
    Gallo, Justin J.
    Parashar, Akhil
    Agarwal, Kanika K.
    Ellis, Stephen G.
    Khot, Umesh N.
    Spooner, Robin
    Tuzcu, Emin Murat
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [32] Organ and tissue donation in clinical settings: a systematic review of the impact of interventions aimed at health professionals
    Douville, Frederic
    Godin, Gaston
    Vezina-Im, Lydi-Anne
    TRANSPLANTATION RESEARCH, 2014, 3
  • [33] Impact of Synchronous Telemedicine Models on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review*
    Nadar, Mahmoud
    Jouvet, Philippe
    Tucci, Marisa
    Toledano, Baruch
    Sicotte, Claude
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : E662 - E671
  • [34] APPLICATION OF LEAN MANAGEMENT TOOLS IN INDUSTRY 4.0: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    do Nascimento, Ingrid Teixeira
    da Silva, Maria Eduarda Alves
    de Souza Gama, Gabriel Rodrigo
    dos Santos, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes
    Santos, Genildo Nonato
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2021, 12 (09): : S856 - S864
  • [35] On the application of Lean principles and practices to innovation management A systematic review
    Solaimani, Sam
    van der Veen, Jack
    Sobek II, Durward K.
    Gulyaz, Erdogan
    Venugopal, Venu
    TQM JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (06): : 1064 - 1092
  • [36] Industry 4.0 Application in Lean Manufacturing- A Systematic Review
    Saad, Sameh M.
    Bhovar, Chandan
    Bahadori, Ramin
    Zhang, Hongwei
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXIV, 2021, 15 : 341 - 346
  • [37] Assessing the Impact of Lean Healthcare on Inpatient Care: A Systematic Review
    Zepeda-Lugo, Carlos
    Tlapa, Diego
    Baez-Lopez, Yolanda
    Limon-Romero, Jorge
    Ontiveros, Sinue
    Perez-Sanchez, Armando
    Tortorella, Guilherme
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (15) : 1 - 24
  • [38] Application of Lean Healthcare methodology in a urology department of a tertiary hospital as a tool for improving efficiency
    Boronat, F.
    Budia, A.
    Broseta, E.
    Ruiz-Cerda, J. L.
    Vivas-Consuelo, D.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2018, 42 (01): : 42 - 48
  • [39] Improving prediction model systematic review methodology: Letter to the Editor
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    Hughes, Tom
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Callaghan, Michael J.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Riley, Richard D.
    TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (04) : 545 - 547
  • [40] Is mindfulness research methodology improving over time? A systematic review
    Goldberg, Simon B.
    Tucker, Raymond P.
    Greene, Preston A.
    Simpson, Tracy L.
    Kearney, David J.
    Davidson, Richard J.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):