Research of Chilean Librarians in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000-2023)

被引:1
|
作者
Gomez-Fuentes, Hector [1 ]
Espinoza-Cuitino, Ingrid [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecnol Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Tecnol Metropolitana, Fac Adm & Econ, Dept Gest Informac, Santiago, Chile
来源
INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGICA | 2025年 / 39卷 / 102期
关键词
Research; Librarians; Chile; Bibliometric Analysis; Library Science Research; ACADEMIC LIBRARIANS;
D O I
10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2025.102.58901
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The article describes the research of Chilean librarians in the period 2000-2023, employing publications indexed in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. It studies 218 articles developed by 72 librarians through a quantitative methodological approach and exploratory scope. As a result, individual production, number of citations received, h-index, and i10-index were identified, highlighting the metrics of three researchers. In addition, the chronological distribution of the articles was analyzed, which tends to increase in the last four years; this was prompted by new authors, postgraduate studies abroad and incentives for researchers and academic personnel. These articles were published in Latin American (61.5 %), European (36.2 %), and American (2.3 %) journals, mainly in Spanish (70.4 %). The thematic distribution corresponds to Information Use and Sociology of Information (17.3 %); Users, Reading and Literacy (14.2 %); Libraries as Physical Collections (11.9 %); Health Sciences (11.9 %); Information Technology and Library Technology (11.5 %), among others. The conclusions remark on the importance of knowing and disseminating the articles of Chilean librarians and encouraging the incorporation of new authors in collaboration with interdisciplinary research groups.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 64
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
    Anker, Markus S.
    Hadzibegovic, Sara
    Lena, Alessia
    Haverkamp, Wilhelm
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (06): : 1291 - 1312
  • [2] A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
    Levine-Clark, Michael
    Gil, Esther L.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & FINANCE LIBRARIANSHIP, 2008, 14 (01) : 32 - 46
  • [3] Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar A content comprehensiveness comparison
    Adriaanse, Leslie S.
    Rensleigh, Chris
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (06): : 727 - 744
  • [4] Navigating in Scopus, Web of science and Google Scholar: a research on Italian LIS studies vitality
    Turbanti, Simona
    AIB STUDI, 2014, 54 (2-3): : 213 - 225
  • [5] Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    Pitsouni, Eleni I.
    Malietzis, George A.
    Pappas, Georgios
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02): : 338 - 342
  • [6] PubMed,Web of Science,Scopus以及Google Scholar比较研究
    廖一平
    医学信息学杂志, 2009, 30 (05) : 18 - 20+23
  • [7] Use Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science for Comprehensive Citation Tracking
    Kloda, Lorie A.
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2007, 2 (03): : 87 - 90
  • [8] An evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citations in operations management
    Chapman, Karen
    Ellinger, Alexander E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (04) : 1039 - 1053
  • [9] Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an Environmental Sciences perspective
    Adriaanse, Leslie S.
    Rensleigh, Chris
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2011, 77 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [10] Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
    Anne-Wil Harzing
    Satu Alakangas
    Scientometrics, 2016, 106 : 787 - 804