Sex Differences in Management, Time to Intervention, and In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock

被引:0
|
作者
Desai, Anushka V. [1 ]
Rani, Rohan [1 ]
Minhas, Anum S. [2 ]
Rahman, Faisal [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, 600 N Wolfe St,Halsted 500, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
cardiogenic shock; sex disparities; outcomes; mechanical circulatory support; percutaneous coronary intervention; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; DISPARITIES; ISCHEMIA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14010180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality, particularly in women. With early intervention being a cornerstone of CS management, this study aims to explore whether sex differences exist in the utilization of critical interventions, timing of treatment, and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI-CS. Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, we queried the National Inpatient Sample (years 2016-2021) for CS-related hospitalizations. We assessed sex differences in utilization, timing, and outcomes of CS interventions, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and prior cardiac interventions via multivariate logistic regressions. Results: Of 1,052,360 weighted CS hospitalizations, 60% were for non-AMI-CS and 40% were for AMI-CS. Women with CS had lower rates of all interventions. For AMI-CS, women had higher likelihoods of in-hospital mortality after revascularization (adjusted odds ratio 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.09-1.22]), mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (1.15 [1.08-1.22]), and right heart catheterization (RHC) (1.10 [1.02-1.19]) (all p < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in the non-AMI-CS group. Women with AMI-CS were less likely to receive early (within 24 h of admission) revascularization (0.93 [0.89-0.96]), MCS (0.76 [0.73-0.80]), or RHC (0.89 [0.84-0.95]); women with non-AMI-CS were less likely to receive early revascularization (0.78 [0.73-0.84]) or RHC (0.83 [0.79-0.88]) (all p < 0.001). Regardless of CS type, in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between men and women receiving early MCS or revascularization. Conclusions: Sex disparities in the frequency of treatment of CS persist on a national scale, with women being more likely to die following treatment and less likely to receive early treatment. However, in-hospital mortality does not differ significantly when men and women are treated equally within 24 h of admission, suggesting that early intervention should be made a priority to mitigate sex-based differences in CS outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors Affecting in-Hospital Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Salarifar, M.
    Sadeghian, S.
    Darabyan, S.
    Solaymani, A.
    Amirzadegan, A. R.
    Mahmoudian, M.
    Hamidian, R.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 38 (03) : 97 - 104
  • [42] Sex differences in in-hospital mortality following a first acute myocardial infarction: symptomatology, delayed presentation, and hospital setting
    George Mnatzaganian
    George Braitberg
    Janet E. Hiller
    Lisa Kuhn
    Rose Chapman
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 16
  • [43] Sex differences in in-hospital mortality following a first acute myocardial infarction: symptomatology, delayed presentation, and hospital setting
    Mnatzaganian, George
    Braitberg, George
    Hiller, Janet E.
    Kuhn, Lisa
    Chapman, Rose
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2016, 16
  • [44] Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
    De Luca, Leonardo
    Mistrulli, Raffaella
    Scirpa, Riccardo
    Thiele, Holger
    De Luca, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [45] Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review
    Shah, Ashish H.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kalra, Ankur
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) : 484 - 493
  • [46] Update on the management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (02) : 99 - 101
  • [47] Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Ya'Qoub, Lina
    Singh, Mandeep
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Sundaragiri, Pranathi R.
    Miller, Virginia M.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (10) : E007154
  • [48] Gender differences in medical care and in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction
    Jneid, Hani
    Fonarow, Gregg
    Ellrodt, Gray
    Maree, Andrew O.
    Moukarbel, George V.
    Palacios, Igor F.
    LaBresh, Kenneth
    Lang, Li
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Fletcher, Gerald
    Peterson, Eric
    Cannon, Chris P.
    Wexler, Laura
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 292A - 292A
  • [49] Sex-Specific Disparities in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Gareja, Neha
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (11) : 1184 - 1185
  • [50] Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
    Bertaina, Maurizio
    Morici, Nuccia
    Frea, Simone
    Garatti, Laura
    Briani, Martina
    Sorini, Carlotta
    Villanova, Luca
    Corrada, Elena
    Sacco, Alice
    Moltrasio, Marco
    Ravera, Amelia
    Tedeschi, Michele
    Bertoldi, Letizia
    Lettino, Maddalena
    Saia, Francesco
    Corsini, Anna
    Camporotondo, Rita
    Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia
    Bertolin, Stephanie
    Rota, Matteo
    Oliva, Fabrizio
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Valente, Serafina
    Pagnesi, Matteo
    Metra, Marco
    Sionis, Alessandro
    Marini, Marco
    De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Tavazzi, Guido
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (06): : 3472 - 3482