High-precision model predictive control and experiment of an unmanned surface vehicle with Gaussian process-based error model

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Nailong [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Yuxin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jigang [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Kunpeng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xinyuan [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Zhiguang [3 ]
Wang, Yueying [4 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, 2999 Renmin North Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Donghua Univ, Engn Res Ctr Digitized Text & Apparel Technol, Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Engn Univ, Coll Intelligent Syst Sci & Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn & Automat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data-driven; model predictive control; USV; Gaussian process; trajectory tracking; UNDERWATER VEHICLE; TRACKING CONTROL; IDENTIFICATION; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1177/09596518251322245
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Model Predictive Control (MPC) is commonly employed for trajectory tracking in control systems. However, Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) systems frequently encounter disturbances and model inaccuracies, resulting in mismatches between predicted and actual behaviors. This paper proposes a Gaussian Process Model Predictive Control (GP-MPC) framework to address the challenges of trajectory tracking in USVs. The MPC framework comprises a nominal model based on kinematic analysis and a Gaussian process error model. The latter compensates for system inaccuracies using sampled data. Simulations and real-world tests are conducted to compare GP-MPC with conventional MPC. The results demonstrate that GP-MPC outperforms the conventional MPC in accurately guiding the USV along the desired trajectory, effectively mitigating environmental disturbances and measurement uncertainties, and enhancing the accuracy and stability of trajectory tracking.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Steering control based on model predictive control for obstacle avoidance of unmanned ground vehicle
    Hu, Chaofang
    Zhao, Lingxue
    Cao, Lei
    Tjan, Patrick
    Wang, Na
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2020, 53 (3-4): : 501 - 518
  • [32] Collision Avoidance Using Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for Unmanned Surface Vehicle
    Sun, Xiaojie
    Wang, Guofeng
    Fan, Yunsheng
    Mu, Dongdong
    Qiu, Bingbing
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [33] Disturbance Observer-Based Model Predictive Control for an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle
    Hu, Yang
    Li, Boyang
    Jiang, Bailun
    Han, Jixuan
    Wen, Chih-Yung
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [34] Nonlinear predictive control with a Gaussian process model
    Kocijan, J
    Murray-Smith, R
    SWITCHING AND LEARNING IN FEEDBACK SYSTEMS, 2005, 3355 : 185 - 200
  • [35] Nonlinear Model Predictive Path Following for an Unmanned Surface Vehicle
    Zheng, Xiang
    Wang, Jianhua
    Zhang, Shanjia
    Zhang, Cheng
    GLOBAL OCEANS 2020: SINGAPORE - U.S. GULF COAST, 2020,
  • [36] Efficient implementation of Gaussian process-based predictive control by quadratic programming
    Polcz, Peter
    Peni, Tamas
    Toth, Roland
    IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 17 (08): : 968 - 984
  • [37] Fuzzy Model Predictive Control of a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
    Hossny, Mohamed
    El-Badawy, Ayman
    Hassan, Ragi
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS'20), 2020, : 1704 - 1713
  • [38] Model Predictive Control of Unmanned Mine Vehicle Trajectory Tracking
    Xin, Peng
    Wang, Zhiwen
    Sun, Hongtao
    Zhang, Bin
    2021 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2021, : 4757 - 4762
  • [39] Model Predictive Control of a Convertible Tiltrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
    Allenspach, Mike
    Ducard, Guillaume J. J.
    2020 28TH MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (MED), 2020, : 715 - 720
  • [40] Obstacle parameter modeling for model predictive control of the unmanned vehicle
    Yeu, Jung-Yun
    Kim, Woo-Hyun
    Im, Jun-Hyuck
    Lee, Dal-Ho
    Jee, Gyu-In
    Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 2012, 18 (12) : 1132 - 1138