ChemTastesPredictor: An ensemble of machine learning classifiers to predict the taste of molecular tastants

被引:0
|
作者
Rojas, Cristian [1 ]
Abril-Gonzalez, Monica [2 ]
Ballabio, Davide [3 ]
Garcia, Fernando [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Azuay, Fac Ciencia & Tecnol, Grp Invest Quimiometria & QSAR, Ave 24 Mayo 7-77 & Hernan Malo, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador
[2] Univ Cuenca, Dept Biociencias, Grp Ingn Reacc Catalisis & Tecnol Medio Ambiente I, Eco Campus Balzay,Ave Victor Manuel Albornoz, Cuenca 010203, Ecuador
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Milano Chemometr & QSAR Res Grp, P za Sci 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Econ, Grp Vinculado CIECS UNC CONICET, Ctr Invest Ciencias Econ, Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
ChemTastesPredictor; Molecular tastant; Machine learning classifiers; QSPR; ChemTastesDB; PLS-REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105380
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The sense of taste plays a critical role in food science, since it directly impacts food consumption, human nutrition, and overall health. Computational models that predict the taste of molecular tastants based on their chemical structure and machine learning classifiers serve as powerful tools in the advancing field of foodinformatics. This study describes the development of ChemTastesPredictor designed to predict the taste of 4075 molecular tastants included in the extended version of ChemTastesDB (https://zenodo.org/records/14963136). To the best of our knowledge, this represents the largest dataset with a broad-based chemical space used to calibrate machine learning (ML) models for taste prediction based on molecular descriptors and fingerprints. For validation, datasets were randomly split into training and test sets in a 75:25 ratio, ensuring balanced class distributions. In binary classification tasks, the Random Forest classifier demonstrated the highest predictive performance for sweet/bitter (NER = 0.928 and F-score = 0.927) and bitter/non-bitter (NER = 0.902 and F-score = 0.903) classification. Adaptive Boosting excelled in the prediction of sweet/non-sweet (NER = 0.861 and Fscore = 0.862). The N-Nearest Neighbors classifier emerged as the optimal classifier for umami/non-umami (NER = 0.957 and F-score = 0.860) and sweet/bitter/umami (NER = 0.870 and F-score = 0.843). These models may be useful in the development and analysis of new chemical tastants.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Machine Learning Approach to the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Based on an Ensemble of Classifiers
    Valladares-Rodriguez, Sonia
    Anido-Rifon, Luis
    Fernandez-Iglesias, Manuel J.
    Facal-Mayo, David
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2019, PT I: 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA, JULY 1-4, 2019, PROCEEDINGS, PT I, 2019, 11619 : 383 - 396
  • [32] Ensemble learning based-features extraction for brain mr images classification with machine learning classifiers
    Remzan, Nihal
    El Hachimi, Younes
    Tahiry, Karim
    Farchi, Abdelmajid
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (19) : 57661 - 57684
  • [33] Machine learning prediction of nanoparticle in vitro toxicity: A comparative study of classifiers and ensemble-classifiers using the Copeland Index
    Furxhi, Irini
    Murphy, Finbarr
    Mullins, Martin
    Poland, Craig A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 312 : 157 - 166
  • [34] Ensemble of machine learning techniques to predict survival in kidney transplant recipients
    Díez-Sanmartín, Covadonga
    Sarasa Cabezuelo, Antonio
    Andrés Belmonte, Amado
    Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 180
  • [35] Using machine learning and an ensemble of methods to predict kidney transplant survival
    Mark, Ethan
    Goldsman, David
    Gurbaxani, Brian
    Keskinocak, Pinar
    Sokol, Joel
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [36] Copying Machine Learning Classifiers
    Unceta, Irene
    Nin, Jordi
    Pujol, Oriol
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08) : 160268 - 160284
  • [37] Printed Machine Learning Classifiers
    Mubarik, Muhammad Husnain
    Weller, Dennis D.
    Bleier, Nathaniel
    Tomei, Matthew
    Aghassi-Hagmann, Jasmin
    Tahoori, Mehdi B.
    Kumar, Rakesh
    2020 53RD ANNUAL IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MICROARCHITECTURE (MICRO 2020), 2020, : 73 - 87
  • [38] Machine learning classifiers in glaucoma
    Bowd, Christopher
    Goldbaum, Michael H.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (06) : 396 - 405
  • [39] A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers
    Srikanth, Phani
    Singh, Amarjot
    Kumar, Devinder
    Nagrare, Aditya
    Angoth, Vivek
    ADVANCED MATERIALS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 271-273 : 149 - 153
  • [40] Classification-based machine learning approaches to predict the taste of molecules: A review
    Rojas, Cristian
    Ballabio, Davide
    Consonni, Viviana
    Suarez-Estrella, Diego
    Todeschini, Roberto
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 171