Impact of pre-examination video education in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI: A comparative study

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Hongfang [1 ]
Li, Chenhui [1 ]
Zeng, Zisan [1 ]
Liang, Junli [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, 6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
anxiety; gadoxetate disodium; image quality; liver magnetic resonance imaging; pre-examination care; satisfaction; video guidance; MOTION ARTIFACTS; PATIENT ANXIETY; PHASE;
D O I
10.1002/jmrs.833
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and early diagnosis via gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly impacts patient outcomes. However, patient anxiety during MRI can affect image quality. This study investigates the impact of pre-examination video education on anxiety, satisfaction and image quality in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI. Methods We prospectively enrolled 480 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI from January 2022 to May 2023 at our hospital. Patients were divided into study and control groups in order of odd and even days, with 240 cases in each group. Before the examination, the radiology staff provided routine verbal guidance and breathing training to the patients in the control group, while the study group was given additional video education. The state anxiety scores, satisfaction scores of the provided information and motion artefact scores of the images before and after the examination were compared between the two groups. Results The state anxiety scores of both groups of patients were lower than before the examination (all P < 0.05), but the change value of the study group was significantly greater than that of the control group (P = 0.004). The satisfaction rate of the information provided before the scan in the study group was significantly higher (P < 0.001). The image quality scores of the arterial phase were similar between the two groups (P = 0.403), but the image quality of the study group in the pre-contrast, portal phase, transitional phase and hepatobiliary phase was significantly better than that of the control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Supplementing routine pre-scan care with video guidance for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI offers several benefits, including reduced patient anxiety, increased satisfaction and improved image quality. These results suggest the potential for widespread application of video-based interventions to enhance the MRI experience for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Images of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography in multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: comparison with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI
    Ohama, Hideko
    Imai, Yasuharu
    Nakashima, Osamu
    Kogita, Sachiyo
    Takamura, Manabu
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Seki, Yasushi
    Sawai, Yoshiyuki
    Igura, Takumi
    Fukuda, Kazuto
    Makino, Yuki
    Morimoto, Osakuni
    Ohsawa, Masahiko
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    Murakami, Takamichi
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) : 1081 - 1093
  • [42] Predictive factors of truncation artifacts in the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: a nationwide multicenter study
    Masakatsu Tsurusaki
    Keitaro Sofue
    Hiromitsu Onishi
    Satoshi Goshima
    Atsushi Higaki
    Hiroyoshi Isoda
    Hiroki Haradome
    Kazunari Ishii
    Takamichi Murakami
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2021, 39 : 165 - 177
  • [43] Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomic features for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Mao, Yingfan
    Wang, Jincheng
    Zhu, Yong
    Chen, Jun
    Mao, Liang
    Kong, Weiwei
    Qiu, Yudong
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    Guan, Yue
    He, Jian
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2022, 11 (01) : 13 - +
  • [44] Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases: DWI alone or combined with MDCT is no substitute for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI
    Schulz, Anselm
    Joelsen-Hatlehol, Eivind Selsto
    Brudvik, Kristoffer Watten
    Aasand, Kjersti Karoline
    Hanekamp, Bettina
    Viktil, Ellen
    Johansen, Cathrine K.
    Dormagen, Johann Baptist
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (03) : 302 - 311
  • [45] Volumetry and 3D Reconstruction for LDLT Based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI
    Schenk, Andrea
    Miller, Stephan
    Nadalin, Silvio
    Schroeder, Tobias
    Radtke, Arnold
    Peitgen, Heinz-Otto
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (06) : S107 - S107
  • [46] Efficacy of liver parenchymal enhancement and liver volume to standard liver volume ratio on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for estimation of liver function
    Yoneyama, Tomohide
    Fukukura, Yoshihiko
    Kamimura, Kiyohisa
    Takumi, Koji
    Umanodan, Aya
    Ueno, Shinichi
    Nakajo, Masayuki
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) : 857 - 865
  • [47] The hepatocyte phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis and early liver cirrhosis in a rat model: An experimental study
    Ma, Chunmei
    Liu, Ailian
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Geng, Xiaoling
    Hao, Li
    Song, Qingwei
    Sun, Bo
    Wang, Heqing
    Zhao, Gang
    LIFE SCIENCES, 2014, 108 (02) : 104 - 108
  • [48] Predictive factors of truncation artifacts in the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: a nationwide multicenter study
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Higaki, Atsushi
    Isoda, Hiroyoshi
    Haradome, Hiroki
    Ishii, Kazunari
    Murakami, Takamichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 165 - 177
  • [49] Organ-focused mutual information for nonrigid multimodal registration of liver CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI
    Fernandez-de-Manuel, Laura
    Wollny, Gert
    Kybic, Jan
    Jimenez-Carretero, Daniel
    Tellado, Jose M.
    Ramon, Enrique
    Desco, Manuel
    Santos, Andres
    Pascau, Javier
    Ledesma-Carbayo, Maria J.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2014, 18 (01) : 22 - 35
  • [50] Detection and differential diagnosis of HCC-nodules versus other liver tumors: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced versus Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the same patient
    Hammerstingl, R
    Vogl, TJ
    Zangos, S
    Schwarz, W
    Balzer, T
    Keck, H
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 373 - 373