Physician-Modified Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair for the Preservation of Hypogastric Artery Perfusion and Efficacy of Hydrogel Coil Fenestration Reinforcement

被引:0
|
作者
Iwakoshi, Shinichi [1 ]
Yokoi, Yoshihiko [1 ]
Yokota, Tatsuya [1 ]
Nakai, Takahiro [1 ]
Tamada, Sayaka [2 ]
Hiraga, Shun [3 ]
Ichihashi, Shigeo [1 ]
Tanaka, Toshihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Radiol, 840 Shijo cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348521, Japan
[2] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Shinjuku ward, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Nara Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Kashihara, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Extending the distal sealing zone into the external iliac artery is sometimes necessary during endovascular abdominal aortic repair. As the use of an iliac branch device is contingent upon certain anatomical requirements, the application of this device is not universal. Herein, we present an alternative method to preserve hypogastric artery perfusion using a physician-modified fenestrated (PMF) AFX limb (Endologix, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) with hydrogel coil reinforcement. Methods: Patients undergoing PMF endovascular abdominal aortic repair for the preservation of hypogastric artery perfusion between October 2022 and October 2023 at a single center were prospectively enrolled. The clinical endpoint was technical success, defined as successful revisualization of the hypogastric artery through the created fenestration and the absence of type 3c endoleaks. Furthermore, hypogastric artery patency and newly developed endoleaks were investigated during the follow-up period. Results: Overall, 16 hypogastric arteries from 15 patients were protected with this technique. The patients' average age was 76.9 +/- 10.4 years. The indications for PMF endovascular abdominal aortic repair were common iliac artery aneurysm (n = 6), hypogastric artery aneurysm (n = 3), correction of type 1b endoleak following previous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (n = 4), and abdominal aortic aneurysm with an inappropriate common iliac sealing zone (n = 3). All patients were considered unsuitable candidates for commercially available iliac branch devices. All fenestrations were reinforced with hydrogel coils. The technical success rate of PMF endovascular abdominal aortic repair was 100%. No branch occlusion or type 3c endoleak developed during the follow-up period (average: 11.6 months). Conclusions: Our preliminary experience suggests that PMF endovascular abdominal aortic repair with hydrogel coil reinforcement for the preservation of hypogastric artery perfusion may be a safe and effective option for extending the sealing zone to the external iliac artery. Further experience and identification of possible complications are necessary to explore the potential for the expanded use of this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 230
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Double Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Graft for Endovascular Treatment of Traumatic Aortic Isthmus Rupture With an Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery
    Freycon-Tardy, Leonore
    Ozdemir, Baris Ata
    Hireche, Kheira
    Alric, Pierre
    Canaud, Ludovic
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023, 30 (01) : 151 - 155
  • [42] Single-Center Experience of Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Physician-modified Endovascular Grafts Before Initiation of an Investigation Device Exemption Trial
    Swerdlow, Nicholas J.
    Marcaccio, Christina L.
    Schemerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E260 - E261
  • [43] Physician-modified Endograft with Left Subclavian Artery Fenestration for Ruptured Type B Aortic Dissection
    Mei, Fei
    Huang, Mingkui
    Wang, Kewei
    Sun, Jianfeng
    Guan, Wenfei
    Fan, Jiawei
    Li, Yu
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 77 : 352.e7 - 352.e11
  • [44] Application of physician-modified fenestrated stent graft in urgent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with hostile neck anatomy Case report
    Zeng, Rong
    Ye, Wei
    Liu, Changwei
    Wang, Xuan
    Song, Xiaojun
    Ni, Leng
    Liu, Bao
    Li, Yongjun
    Zheng, Yuehong
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (46)
  • [45] Safety and efficacy of physician-modified thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a low-profile device for aortic arch lesions
    Hashizume, Kenichi
    Mori, Mitsuharu
    Yagami, Toshiaki
    Takaki, Hidenobu
    Matsuoka, Tadashi
    Nara, Tsutomu
    Nishida, Mayu
    Shimizu, Hideyuki
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2023, 31 (04): : 340 - 347
  • [46] Fenestrated Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Physician-Modified Stent Grafts for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection With Unhealthy Proximal Landing Zone
    Zhu, Jiechang
    Zhao, Lujing
    Dai, Xiangchen
    Feng, Zhou
    Fan, Hailun
    Luo, Yudong
    Zhang, Yiwei
    Hu, Fanguo
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 62S - 64S
  • [47] Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients
    Chassin-Trubert, Lucien
    Gandet, Thomas
    Lounes, Youcef
    Ozdemir, Baris Ata
    Alric, Pierre
    Canaud, Ludovic
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 73 (06) : 1898 - +
  • [48] Impact of Combining Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis and Physician-Modified Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Concomitant Iliac Artery Aneurysms
    Han, Jesse Y.
    Dibartolomeo, Alexander D.
    Pyun, Alyssa J.
    Hong, Yong H.
    Paige, Jacquelyn F.
    Magee, Gregory A.
    Weaver, Fred A.
    Han, Sukgu M.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 111 : 13 - 24
  • [49] A hemodynamic analysis of fenestrated physician-modified endograft repair for complicated aortic dissections involving the visceral arteries
    Jiang, Xudong
    Xiang, Guangyuan
    Du, Guanting
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Wu, Peng
    Du, Xiaolong
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 242
  • [50] Palliative Repair of a Mycotic Aortic Arch Pseudoaneurysm With a Physician-Modified Endograft and In-Situ Laser Fenestration
    Hill, Morgan A.
    Wooster, Mathew
    Zeigler, Sanford
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024, 31 (01) : 132 - 135