Age at First Fracture and Later Fracture Risk in Older Adults Undergoing Osteoporosis Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Ye, Carrie [1 ]
Morin, Suzanne N. [2 ]
Lix, Lisa M. [3 ]
Mccloskey, Eugene V. [4 ,5 ]
Johansson, Helena [4 ,6 ,7 ]
Harvey, Nicholas C. [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Kanis, John A. [4 ]
Leslie, William D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, 11350 83 Ave NW,8-130 Clin Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Sheffield, England
[5] Univ Sheffield, MRC Versus Arthrit Ctr Integrated Res Musculoskel, Dept Oncol & Metab, Sheffield, England
[6] Univ Southampton, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiol Ctr, Southampton, England
[7] Australian Catholic Univ, Mary McKillop Inst Hlth Res, Melbourne, Australia
[8] Univ Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, England
[9] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48208
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Fragility fractures are often defined as those that occur after a certain age (eg, 40-50 years). Whether fractures occurring in early adulthood are equally associated with future fractures is unclear. Objective To examine whether the age at which a prior fracture occurred is associated with future fracture risk. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational, population-based cohort study included individuals from the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry with a first bone mineral density (BMD) measurement between January 1, 1996, and March 31, 2018, with and without prior fracture in adulthood. Data analysis was completed between April 1, and May 31, 2023. Exposure Individuals with fractures before their first dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were stratified by the age at first fracture (10-year intervals from 20-29 to >= 80 years of age). Main Outcomes and Measures Incident fractures occurring after dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (index date) and before March 31, 2021, were identified using linked provincial administrative health data. Results The cohort included 88 696 individuals (80 066 [90.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.6 [11.0] years) with a mean (SD) femoral neck T score of -1.4 (1.0). A total of 21 105 individuals (23.8%) had sustained a prior fracture at a mean (SD) age of 57.7 (13.6) years (range, 20.0-102.4 years) at the time of first prior fracture. During a mean (SD) of 9.0 (5.5) years of follow-up, incident fractures occurred in 13 239 individuals (14.6%), including 12 425 osteoporotic fractures (14.0%), 9440 major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) (10.6%), and 3068 hip fractures (3.5%). The sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratios for all incident fractures, osteoporotic fractures, and MOFs, according to age at first fracture, were all significantly elevated, with point estimates ranging from 1.55 (95% CI, 1.28-1.88) to 4.07 (95% CI, 2.99-5.52). After adjusting for the additional covariates, the effect estimates were similar and remained significantly elevated, with point estimates ranging from fully adjusted hazard ratios of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.42-1.60) to 2.12 (95% CI, 1.67-2.71) across age categories. Sensitivity analyses examining age at last prior fracture and in those with multiple prior fractures showed similar results. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, fractures in adulthood were associated with future fractures regardless of the age at which they occurred. Thus, fractures in early adulthood should not be excluded when assessing an individual's ongoing fracture risk.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hip Fracture Risk Assessment Tools for Adults Aged 80 Years and Older
    Ensrud, Kristine E.
    Schousboe, John T.
    Crandall, Carolyn J.
    Leslie, William D.
    Fink, Howard A.
    Cawthon, Peggy M.
    Kado, Deborah M.
    Lane, Nancy E.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Langsetmo, Lisa
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (06) : e2418612
  • [32] Assessment of women after Colles fracture for osteoporosis and hip fracture risk using the 'Black Fracture Score'
    Dolan, AL
    Califf, S
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 : S7 - S7
  • [33] Assessment of women after Colles Fracture for osteoporosis and hip fracture risk using the 'Black Fracture Score'.
    Dolan, L
    Califf, S
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2003, 18 : S243 - S243
  • [34] ASSESSMENT OF WOMEN AFTER COLLES FRACTURE FOR OSTEOPOROSIS AND HIP FRACTURE RISK USING THE 'BLACK FRACTURE SCORE'
    Dolan, L.
    Califf, S.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 : 25 - 26
  • [35] FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT BY REMS IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OSTEOPOROSIS
    Messina, C.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 35 : S575 - S575
  • [36] Mathematical Model for the Assessment of Fracture Risk Associated with Osteoporosis
    Dinis, Jairson
    Pereira, Ana I.
    Fonseca, Elza M.
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS (ICNAAM 2012), VOLS A AND B, 2012, 1479 : 814 - 817
  • [37] Osteoporosis Canada 2010 Guidelines for the Assessment of Fracture Risk
    Lentle, Brian
    Cheung, Angela M.
    Hanley, David A.
    Leslie, William D.
    Lyons, David
    Papaioannou, Alexandra
    Atkinson, Stephanie
    Brown, Jacques P.
    Feldman, Sidney
    Hodsman, Anthony B.
    Jamal, Abida Sophina
    Josse, Robert G.
    Kaiser, Stephanie M.
    Kvern, Brent
    Morin, Suzanne
    Siminoski, Kerry
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2011, 62 (04): : 243 - 250
  • [38] Mortality, Morbidity, and Assessment of Fracture Risk in Male Osteoporosis
    O. Johnell
    J. Kanis
    G. Gullberg
    Calcified Tissue International, 2001, 69 : 182 - 184
  • [39] Mortality, morbidity, and assessment of fracture risk in male osteoporosis
    Johnell, O
    Kanis, J
    Gullberg, G
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 69 (04) : 182 - 184
  • [40] Assessment of fracture risk: Who should be treated for osteoporosis?
    van der Klift, M
    de Laet, CDE
    Pols, HAP
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06): : 937 - 950