Evaluation of compression index of red mud by machine learning interpretability methods

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jieya [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Mingxing [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Wenwen [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Xiaoqiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Key Lab Civil Engn Disaster Prevent & Contr, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Red mud; Compression index; Machine learning models; SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP); SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; PREDICTION; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107130
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The annual increase in red mud emissions necessitates the expansion of bauxite residue disposal areas (BRDAs), while the escalating land value has led to proposals for development on closed BRDAs. Therefore, understanding the compressive properties of red mud is critical for the safe management and construction of BRDAs. The process of deriving compression index (Cc) through consolidation tests to assess compression characteristics is both time-intensive and vulnerable to the quality of the sampling methods employed. Consequently, it is essential to develop predictive models for compression indices that utilize more easily measurable physical parameters. This study proposes the use of machine learning(ML) models to predict the Ccof red mud. Several machine learning models were studied, including Linear Regression (LR), Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Machines (SVR), Random Forest(RF), Extremely Randomized Trees (Extra Trees), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Category Boosting (CatBoost), and LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine). The grid search algorithm was used to obtain the optimal parameters for each ML model, and k-fold cross-validation was employed to enhance the model's generalization performance. Ultimately, the KNN model achieved the best performance. The SHAP method was used to describe the specific influence patterns, and to provide a quantitative contribution of each feature to the Ccof red mud. The research indicated that the IL and wn exerted the most substantial influence on the Cc, yielding a positive effect.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning methods for low-cost pollen monitoring - Model optimisation and interpretability
    Mills, Sophie A.
    Maya-Monzano, Jose M.
    Tummon, Fiona
    MacKenzie, Rob
    Pope, Francis D.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903
  • [22] Optimization and Interpretability Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for ZnO Colloid Particle Size Prediction
    Fan, Lin
    Yu, Honglei
    He, Yan
    Guo, Jinyuan
    Min, Guangjun
    Wang, Juan
    ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS, 2025, 8 (06) : 2682 - 2692
  • [23] Interpretability and Reproducability in Production Machine Learning Applications
    Ghanta, Sindhu
    Subramanian, Sriram
    Sundararaman, Swaminathan
    Khermosh, Lior
    Sridhar, Vinay
    Arteaga, Dulcardo
    Luo, Qianmei
    Das, Dhananjoy
    Talagala, Nisha
    2018 17TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA), 2018, : 658 - 664
  • [24] On the evaluation of deep learning interpretability methods for medical images under the scope of faithfulness
    Lamprou, Vangelis
    Kallipolitis, Athanasios
    Maglogiannis, Ilias
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 253
  • [25] Machine learning interpretability meets TLS fingerprinting
    Mahdi Jafari Siavoshani
    Amirhossein Khajehpour
    Amirmohammad Ziaei Bideh
    Amirali Gatmiri
    Ali Taheri
    Soft Computing, 2023, 27 : 7191 - 7208
  • [26] A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging
    Wang, Alan Q.
    Karaman, Batuhan K.
    Kim, Heejong
    Rosenthal, Jacob
    Saluja, Rachit
    Young, Sean I.
    Sabuncu, Mert R.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 53277 - 53292
  • [27] StrategyAtlas: Strategy Analysis for Machine Learning Interpretability
    Collaris, Dennis
    van Wijk, Jarke J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2023, 29 (06) : 2996 - 3008
  • [28] Trustworthy Machine Learning: Robustness, Generalization, and Interpretability
    Wang, Jindong
    Li, Haoliang
    Wang, Haohan
    Pan, Sinno Jialin
    Xie, Xing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2023, 2023, : 5827 - 5828
  • [29] Machine learning interpretability meets TLS fingerprinting
    Siavoshani, Mahdi Jafari
    Khajehpour, Amirhossein
    Bideh, Amirmohammad Ziaei
    Gatmiri, Amirali
    Taheri, Ali
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (11) : 7191 - 7208
  • [30] Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning
    Gilpin, Leilani H.
    Bau, David
    Yuan, Ben Z.
    Bajwa, Ayesha
    Specter, Michael
    Kagal, Lalana
    2018 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS (DSAA), 2018, : 80 - 89