Can Environmental Protection Tax Promote Urban Green Transformation? Experimental Evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Qi, Zhankun [1 ,2 ]
Long, Feng [2 ,3 ]
Bi, Fenfen [2 ,3 ]
Tian, Xue [2 ,3 ]
Qian, Ziwei [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Xianming [1 ]
Ge, Chazhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310036, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Ctr Environm Tax, Beijing 100041, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Joint Res Ctr Ecol Conservat & High Qual Dev, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental protection tax; DID; GTFP; green transformation; spatial durbin model; CARBON TAX; PRODUCTIVITY; EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.3390/su16209011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As one of China's important environmental and economic policies, the environmental protection tax (EPT) is important in promoting economic and social green transformation. In this study, the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of 283 prefecture-level cities in China from 2013 to 2022 was calculated using a Super Slack-Based Model (Super-SBM) and the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) index, which includes undesirable outputs. Moreover, the implementation effect of environmental tax on promoting urban green transformation is identified through the difference-in-differences (DID) model. This study revealed that (1) an EPT can significantly increase the GTFP of a city and promote its green transformation. (2) Industrial structure optimization and technological innovation are important mechanisms through which EPT drives urban green transformation. (3) The implementation effect of EPT in promoting urban green transformation presents significant policy differences across geographic locations, whether cities are key environmental protection cities or types of resource-based cities. EPT can significantly promote the green transformation of local cities, which in turn can positively affect the green transformation of neighboring cities. Based on this study's conclusions, suggestions are put forward to improve the EPT system to promote urban green transformation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does environmental regulation promote corporate green investment? Evidence from China's new environmental protection law
    Liu, Sheng
    Liu, Heming
    Chen, Xiuying
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (05) : 12589 - 12618
  • [32] Can environmental regulation improve the industrial ecology efficiency? Evidence from China's environmental protection tax reform
    Kong, Lingqian
    Yao, Yuxiu
    Xu, Kai
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [33] Can green tax policy promote China?s energy transformation?- A nonlinear analysis from production and consumption perspectives
    Fang, Guochang
    Chen, Gang
    Yang, Kun
    Yin, Weijun
    Tian, Lixin
    ENERGY, 2023, 269
  • [34] Can the digital economy promote urban green economic efficiency? Evidence from 273 cities in China
    Huang, Lu
    Zhang, Hongfeng
    Si, Hongyun
    Wang, Haoyu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 155
  • [35] Can the establishment of eco-industrial parks promote urban green innovation? Evidence from China
    Wu, Yongchao
    Gao, Xinyu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 341
  • [36] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [37] Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: Evidence from China
    Muganyi, Tadiwanashe
    Yan, Linnan
    Sun, Hua-ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 7
  • [38] Can Market-Based Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation? Evidence from China
    Qu, Fang
    Xu, Lei
    Chen, Yufeng
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [39] Environmental regulation and corporate exports: Quasi-experimental evidence from China's environmental protection tax law
    Ye, Daocun
    Tu, Yuanfen
    Xia, Siwen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [40] Can environmental tax curb air pollution: evidence from China
    Li, Zheng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (11) : 1449 - 1452