The role of knowledge sharing in organisational and individual wellbeing

被引:0
|
作者
Prentice, Catherine [1 ]
Zeidan, Susan [2 ]
Prentice, Louis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Business, 37 Sinnathamby Blvd, Springfield Cent, Qld 4300, Australia
[2] Zayed Univ, Coll Business, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[3] CLYP PTY LTD, Ballarat, Australia
关键词
Wellbeing; organisational sustainability; knowledge sharing; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/14778238.2024.2446509
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Organisational and employee wellbeing are key to business success and sustainability. Knowledge sharing has implications for individual and organisational performance. In view of unprecedented organisational changes resulting from the recent pandemic, the study investigates how organisational wellbeing drives employees' knowledge sharing behaviours, and how such behaviours influence employee wellbeing. Organisational culture is modelled as a moderator. The study was undertaken in Australia with full-time employees from various sizes of firms, who occupied different levels of positions, including frontline and backstage. Structural equation modelling was performed to test the proposed relationships. The results show significant relationships between organisational wellbeing and knowledge sharing, and between knowledge sharing and employee wellbeing. Organisational culture plays a significant moderation role. However, the moderation effects are negative. The study contributes to organisational behaviours, positive psychology, and knowledge sharing research. The findings have implications for human resource and health practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Synergistic Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Learning on Organisational Learning: Demonstrating Organisational Performance
    Khan, Muhammad Omer Nadeem
    Rahman, Saleem ur
    Khan, Mohammad Bashir
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 14 (03)
  • [32] Individual variables with an impact on knowledge sharing: the critical role of employees' ignorance
    Israilidis, John
    Siachou, Evangelia
    Cooke, Louise
    Lock, Russell
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (06) : 1109 - 1123
  • [33] Knowledge Sharing as a Problem of the Individual Nature of Knowledge
    Reznicek, Vaclav
    Smutny, Zdenek
    Kalina, Jaroslav
    Galba, Alexander
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2013), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 920 - 925
  • [34] Knowledge sharing, job attitudes and organisational citizenship behaviour
    Teh, Pei-Lee
    Sun, Hongyi
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2012, 112 (1-2) : 64 - 82
  • [35] An empirical model of four processes for sharing organisational knowledge
    Tsai, August
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2014, 38 (02) : 305 - 320
  • [36] Organisational justice and innovative behaviour: Is knowledge sharing a mediator?
    Jnaneswar, K.
    Ranjit, Gayathri
    INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING, 2021, 53 (01) : 77 - 91
  • [37] Organisational commitment and knowledge sharing at different stages of education
    Wziatek--Stasko, Anna
    Michalik, Izabela
    E-MENTOR, 2024, (01):
  • [38] The Directional Knowledge Sharing Paradigm: A Mixed-Methods Case Study of the Interaction between Organisational Culture and Intra-Organisational Knowledge Sharing
    Baker, Ali M.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 21 (03)
  • [39] Supporting Individual Needs for Intra-Organisational Knowledge Sharing Activities in Pre-Industry 4.0 SMEs
    Li, Dan
    Paulin, Dan
    Fast-Berglund, Asa
    Gullander, Per
    Bligard, Lars-Ola
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2018), 2018, : 160 - 170
  • [40] Theory-based Approach to Studying the Influence of Individual Cultural Background on Intra-organisational Knowledge Sharing
    Block, Madeleine
    Laurinkari, Juhani
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2012, : 499 - 506