Far cortical locking versus standard locking screw fixation in simulated femoral fractures: A biomechanical meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Bullock, Robert S. [1 ]
Coury, John G. [1 ]
Liakos, Brendan [1 ]
Huish, Eric G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Valley Consortium Med Educ, 1400 Florida Ave,Suite 200, Modesto, CA 95350 USA
关键词
Far cortical locking; Distal femur; Supracondylar femur; Nonunion; Biomechanical; DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES; DYNAMIC CONDYLAR SCREW; PLATE FIXATION; STABILIZATION; CONSTRUCTS; LISS; STIFFNESS; STRONGER; HOLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Far cortical locking (FCL) is a concept of locking plate fixation with reduced stiffness and symmetric micromotion to improve callus formation. The goal of our study was to review biomechanical data evaluating FCL plate and screw fixation versus standard locking (SL) plate and screw fixation by analyzing studies of cadaveric and synthetic bone models to draw biomechanical conclusions. Methods: Biomechanical studies that compared FCL and SL plate fixation for simulated femoral fractures were reviewed for construct stiffness, load to failure, axial motion at the near and far cortices, and the difference between near and far cortical axial motion to demonstrate motion symmetry. Results: FCL decreased stiffness by 1.069 kN/mm compared to SL (95 % CI 0.405 to 1.732, p = 0.002). FCL demonstrated greater axial motion than SL in the near cortex by 0.425 mm (95 % CI 0.359 to 0.491, p < 0.001) and in the far cortex by 0.456 mm (95 % CI 0.378 to 0.534, p < 0.001). FCL resulted in symmetric motion with no significant difference between far and near cortices with the far cortex displacing 0.347 mm more than near (95 % CI -0.038 to 0.731, p = 0.78). SL resulted in asymmetric motion favoring the far cortex by 0.270 mm (0.096-0.443, p = 0.002). Construct strength was not significantly different with FCL load to failure 0.367 kN greater than SL (95 % CI -0.762 to 1.496, p = 0.524). Conclusion: FCL screw fixation in femoral fractures achieves the goals of reducing construct stiffness and promoting more symmetric axial motion while maintaining construct strength. These results support the overall biomechanical goals of far cortical locking and should encourage investigation into its effects on clinical and radiographic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Locking versus non-locking plate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures: a meta-analysis
    Chrcanovic, B. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (10) : 1243 - 1250
  • [2] Application of Far Cortical Locking Technology in Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study
    Moazen, Mehran
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Pagkalos, Joseph
    Marghoub, Arsalan
    Fagan, Michael J.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (08): : 1849 - 1856
  • [3] Biomechanical Comparison of Bicortical Locking Versus Unicortical Far-Cortex-Abutting Locking Screw-Plate Fixation for Comminuted Radial Shaft Fractures
    Overturf, Steven J.
    Morris, Randal P.
    Gugala, Zbigniew
    Lindsey, Ronald W.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (10): : 1907 - 1913
  • [4] Locking plate fixation of humeral head fractures with a telescoping screw. A comparative biomechanical study versus a standard plate
    Gradl, Gertraud
    Stedtfeld, Hans-Werner
    Morlock, Michael
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Mittlmeier, Thomas
    Gradl, Georg
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06): : 734 - 738
  • [5] Commentary on "Biomechanical Comparison of Bicortical Locking Versus Unicortical Far-Cortex-Abutting Locking Screw-Plate Fixation for Comminuted Radial Shaft Fractures"
    Pappas, Nick D.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (10): : 1914 - 1914
  • [6] The Use of Far Cortical Locking Constructs for Fixation of Periprosthetic Fractures
    Fitzpatrick, Dan
    Hansen, Kirk
    Madey, Steven
    Bottlang, Michael
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 28 (03) : 260 - 264
  • [7] Volar locking plate fixation versus external fixation of distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis
    Gouk, Conor J. C.
    Bindra, Randip R.
    Tarrant, Drew J.
    Thomas, Michael J. E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (09) : 954 - 960
  • [8] Far Cortical Locking Versus Standard Constructs for Locked Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Acute, Displaced Fractures of the Distal Femur
    Lefaivre, Kelly A.
    Slobogean, Gerard
    O'Hara, Nathan N.
    O'Brien, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (19): : 1739 - 1749
  • [9] Volar locking plate versus external fixation in distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis
    Maccagnano, Giuseppe
    Noia, Giovanni
    Vicenti, Giovanni
    Baglioni, Marco
    Masciale, Maria Rosa
    Cassano, Giuseppe Danilo
    Vitiello, Raffaele
    Moretti, Biagio
    Pesce, Vito
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [10] Monoaxial versus polyaxial locking systems: a biomechanical analysis of different locking systems for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures
    Zettl, Ralph
    Mueller, Thorben
    Topp, Tobias
    Lewan, Ulrike
    Krueger, Antonio
    Kuehne, Christian
    Ruchholtz, Steffen
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (08) : 1245 - 1250