Comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine adherence with telemedicine vs. in-person for rural and urban patients

被引:0
|
作者
Reese, Thomas J. [1 ]
Padi-Adjirackor, Nana Addo [2 ]
Griffith, Kevin N.
Steitz, Bryan [2 ]
Patrick, Stephen W. [1 ]
Leech, Ashley A. [2 ,3 ]
Wiese, Andrew D. [2 ,4 ]
Wright, Adam [4 ]
Shah, Mauli, V [4 ]
Ancker, Jessica S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Informat, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1475, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.japh.2024.102318
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed buprenorphine to be prescribed for opioid use disorder via telemedicine without an in-person visit. A recently proposed change will limit buprenorphine access to 30 days without an in-person visit. Given that people living in rural areas may be disproportionally impacted by this change, we sought to better understand how buprenorphine adherence may be impacted by requiring in-person visits. Objective: Compare buprenorphine adherence after telemedicine to adherence after in-person visits for patients who live in rural and urban areas. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic health record data from a large medical center. The cohort included all adult patients prescribed buprenorphine for opioid use disorder during 2017-2022. The primary outcome was adherence, characterized by the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) and gaps in buprenorphine treatment at 30 and 180 days. We conducted a longitudinal analysis at visit level, stratified by patient urbanicity, and controlled for patient, prescriber, prescription, and setting characteristics. Results: From 511 patients, we followed 3302 in-person and 519 telemedicine visits. Compared to in-person visits we observed no difference in the adherence following telemedicine visits overall. However, telemedicine was associated with higher MPR for rural patients (30 days: adjusted marginal effects FAME], 3.7%; 95% CI, 2.0-5.5; P < 0.001 and 180 days: AME, 8.5%; 95% CI 5.7-11.3; P < 0.001) and fewer gaps (30 days: AME, -6.7%; 95% CI, -9.9 to -0.1; P < 0.001 and 180 days: AME, -9.4%; -14.0 to -4.5; P < 0.001) compared to in-person visits. Conclusion: These findings suggest that telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person visits, especially for patients living in rural areas, which should help guide future policies that preserve or increase access to buprenorphine in a manner that can reduce barriers for patients.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Telemedicine is as effective as in-person visits for patients with asthma
    Portnoy, Jay M.
    Waller, Morgan
    De Lurgio, Stephen
    Dinakar, Chitra
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 117 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [12] Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach
    Schallhorn, Steven C.
    Hannan, Stephen J.
    Teenan, David
    Pelouskova, Martina
    Schallhorn, Julie M.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 : 2459 - 2470
  • [13] Telehealth vs. In-Person Visits: Bariatric Outcomes
    Pagani, Ioanna
    Raftopoulos, Ioannis
    Bell, Michael
    Chin, Kimberly
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 : 279 - 279
  • [14] Comparison of in-person vs. telebehavioral health outcomes from rural populations across America
    McCord, Carly
    Ullrich, Fred
    Merchant, Kimberly A. S.
    Bhagianadh, Divya
    Carter, Knute D.
    Nelson, EveLynn
    Marcin, James P.
    Law, Kari Beth
    Neufeld, Jonathan
    Giovanetti, Annaleis
    Ward, Marcia M.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [15] Comparison of in-person vs. telebehavioral health outcomes from rural populations across America
    Carly McCord
    Fred Ullrich
    Kimberly A. S. Merchant
    Divya Bhagianadh
    Knute D. Carter
    EveLynn Nelson
    James P. Marcin
    Kari Beth Law
    Jonathan Neufeld
    Annaleis Giovanetti
    Marcia M. Ward
    BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [16] Do Telemedicine vs. In-Person Outpatient Type 1 Diabetes Visits Immediately Improve Glycemic Control?
    Ferber, Christopher J.
    Wilhalme, Holly
    Mittelman, Steve
    Moin, Tannaz
    Hicks, Rebecca A.
    DIABETES, 2023, 72
  • [17] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF VIRTUAL VS. IN-PERSON VISITS IN THE INITIAL EVALUATION OF ABDOMINAL PAIN PRIOR TO AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Sasankan, Priya
    Mcmichael, John
    Lyu, Ruishen
    Rouphael, Carol
    Baggott, Brian
    Garber, Ari
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S857 - S857
  • [18] The Effectiveness and Feasibility of Palliative Care via Video Telemedicine for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Nonrandomized Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Combination of Telemedicine and in-Person Care with in-Person Care Alone
    Chida, Akihiko
    Hamamoto, Yasuo
    Hirata, Kenro
    Sato, Yasunori
    So, Eiichiro
    Kishimoto, Shotaro
    Noguchi, Satoko
    Horie, Sara
    Saito, Yuki
    Shimozaki, Keitaro
    Tsugaru, Kai
    Togasaki, Kazuhiro
    Kawasaki, Kenta
    Hayashi, Hideyuki
    Kanai, Takanori
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 503 - 511
  • [19] Cost and cost-effectiveness of computerized vs. in-person motivational interventions in the criminal justice system
    Cowell, Alexander J.
    Zarkin, Gary A.
    Wedehase, Brendan J.
    Lerch, Jennifer
    Walters, Scott T.
    Taxman, Faye S.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2018, 87 : 42 - 49
  • [20] The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease
    Sillcox, Rachel
    Gitonga, Baraka
    Meiklejohn, Duncan A.
    Wright, Andrew S.
    Oelschlager, Brant K.
    Bryant, Mary Kate
    Tarefder, Rafiqul
    Khan, Zafrul
    Zhu, Jay
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (07): : 5696 - 5702