CHARACTERISTICS OF VISUAL COMPLEXITY: CALLIGRAPHIC FONTS VS. PRINTED FONTS

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Yuchen [1 ]
Lyu, Ruimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Jiangsu Key Univ Lab Software & Media Technol Hum, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Visual complexity; writing systems; Chinese calligraphic; AI calligraphic; COMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1109/ICMEW63481.2024.10645358
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Chinese characters possess diverse calligraphic styles and corresponding calligraphers. These styles are evidently manifested on a visual level, stemming from certain visual disparities between calligraphic characters and common characters. We aim to explore the specific visual disparities that distinguish calligraphic characters from standard ones, endowing them with higher levels of recognition difficulty and artistic value. This can help evaluate to what extent AI-generated calligraphic characters match a specific calligraphy style. To achieve this, we leveraged research findings on visual complexity to measure various aspects of complexity for a certain number of calligraphic characters and printed characters. We found that the significant differences in visual complexity between the two lie in perimeter complexity, terminations, and intersections. Based on the findings, we evaluated the quality of calligraphic characters generated by Midjourney. They basically possess the common characteristics of calligraphic characters, but do not quite match the specified calligraphic style.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What Differs in Visual Recognition of Handwritten vs. Printed Letters? An fMRI Study
    Longcamp, Marieke
    Hlushchuk, Yevhen
    Hari, Riitta
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2011, 32 (08) : 1250 - 1259
  • [22] Accuracy vs. complexity: A trade-off in visual question answering models
    Farazi, Moshiur
    Khan, Salman
    Barnes, Nick
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2021, 120 (120)
  • [23] Visual Search Characteristics in Mammogram Reading: SFM vs. FFDM
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 7627
  • [24] Complexity vs. Simplicity: The Winner Is?
    Mistry, H. B.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 101 (03) : 326 - 326
  • [25] Parallel vs. parametric complexity
    Mulmuley, K
    ALGORITHMS AND DATA STRUCTURES, 1997, 1272 : 282 - 283
  • [26] Linguistic Complexity: English vs. Polish, Text vs. Corpus
    Kwapien, J.
    Drozdz, S.
    Orczyk, A.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2010, 117 (04) : 716 - 720
  • [27] Assessing sound symbolism: Investigating phonetic forms, visual shapes and letter fonts in an implicit bouba-kiki experimental paradigm
    De Carolis, Lea
    Marsico, Egidio
    Arnaud, Vincent
    Coupe, Christophe
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [28] Characteristics of fMRI responses to visual stimulation in anesthetized vs. awake mice
    Thi Ngoc Anh Dinh
    Jung, Won Beom
    Shim, Hyun-Ji
    Kim, Seong-Gi
    NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 226
  • [29] The economics of classification: error vs. complexity
    de Ridder, D
    Pekalska, E
    Duin, RPW
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 244 - 247
  • [30] Complexity vs. Lean, the Big Showdown
    Appelo, Jurgen
    LEAN ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 65 : 53 - 54