Prognostic Significance of Visit-to-Visit Ultrafiltration Volume Variability in Hemodialysis Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Sagi, Balazs [1 ,2 ]
Vas, Tibor [1 ]
Fejes, Eva [3 ]
Csiky, Botond [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Nephrol & Diabet Ctr, Clin Ctr, Dept Internal Med 2, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
[2] Natl Dialys Ctr Pecs, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Hosp Komlo, Clin Ctr, H-7623 Pecs, Hungary
关键词
end-stage kidney disease; hemodialysis; ultrafiltration volume variability; survival; MACE; echocardiography; BLOOD-PRESSURE VARIABILITY; MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; PREDICTS MORTALITY; LONG-TERM; CONTROVERSIES; ASSOCIATION; DYSFUNCTION; DIALYSIS;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines13030717
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) have significantly higher mortality compared with the general population. Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the primary reason for death in these patients. Suboptimal extracellular fluid management increases the CV risk of HD patients. We aimed to study the effect of visit-to-visit ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability on CV events and mortality in chronic HD patients. Patients and Methods: In our study, 173 chronic HD patients were included (median age: 63 +/- 13 years; 53% men). Ultrafiltration volume (UV) variability was analyzed retrospectively for 24 months. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated using the indices of UV variability. CV is the SD divided by the mean. The obtained parameters were SD and CV of the UV: UVSD and UVCV. UV data during the observation period were recorded and used to calculate UV variability. Routine transthoracal echocardiography was performed. Results: Patients were divided into groups based on the median of UVSD, low-UVSD (<568 mL) and high-UVSD (>= 568 mL) group; and also based on the median of UVCV, low- (<0.29) and high-UVCV (>= 0.29) group. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the high compared to the low-UVSD (21/84 vs. 9/89; p < 0.001) group. Similarly, mortality was higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (18/78 vs. 12/95; p = 0.005) after 24 months. Major adverse CV event (MACE) rates were also significantly higher in the high- compared to the low-UVSD group (20/84 vs. 8/89; p < 0.001). Similarly, the MACE rate was significantly higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (15/78 vs. 13/95; p = 0.029) after 24 months. There was no significant difference between the groups in CV mortality. UVSD correlated with parathormone (PTH) level (r = 0.416; p = 0.015), and UVCV with total cholesterol (r = 0.419; p = 0.015). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were higher in the high-UVCV group compared to the low-UVCV group (49.95 vs. 52.08; p = 0.013 and 32.19 vs. 34.13; p = 0.034). Conclusions: According to our results, high UVSD and UVCD are associated with increased all-cause mortality and MACE rates but not CV mortality in chronic HD patients. Cardiovascular changes caused by increased UF volume variability during HD may contribute to higher CV morbidity and mortality in these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability Is a Strong Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Hemodialysis Insights From FOSIDIAL
    Rossignol, Patrick
    Cridlig, Joelle
    Lehert, Philippe
    Kessler, Michele
    Zannad, Faiez
    HYPERTENSION, 2012, 60 (02) : 339 - +
  • [42] Relative and Combined Prognostic Importance of On-Treatment Mean and Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in ONTARGET and TRANSCEND Patients
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Schumacher, Helmut
    Boehm, Michael
    Redon, Josep
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    Verdecchia, Paolo
    Sleight, Peter
    Teo, Koon
    Yusuf, Salim
    HYPERTENSION, 2017, 70 (05) : 938 - +
  • [43] VISIT-TO-VISIT BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN PATIENT WITH HYPERTENSION AND STROKE
    Minushkina, L.
    Kazakova, A.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E221 - E221
  • [44] Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability, Neuropathology, and Cognitive Decline
    Ma, Yuan
    Blacker, Deborah
    Viswanathan, Anand
    van Veluw, Susanne J.
    Bos, Daniel
    Vernooij, Meike W.
    Hyman, Bradley T.
    Tzourio, Christophe
    Das, Sudeshna
    Hofman, Albert
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (23) : E2812 - E2823
  • [45] Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure and Alzheimer's disease
    Lattanzi, Simona
    Brigo, Francesco
    Vernieri, Fabrizio
    Silvestrini, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2018, 20 (05): : 918 - 924
  • [46] Is It Time to Employ a Measure of Visit-to-Visit Variability in Clinical Practice?
    Whelton, Paul K.
    Pollock, Benjamin D.
    HYPERTENSION, 2017, 70 (02) : 227 - 228
  • [47] Visit-to-Visit Variability of Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease
    Hussein, Wael F.
    Chang, Tara I.
    CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2015, 17 (04)
  • [48] VISIT-TO-VISIT BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY VARIES BY AGE GROUPS
    Lukito, A. A.
    Thengker, A.
    Hadi, M. W.
    Christiani, A.
    Damay, V. A.
    Lim, H.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E1 - E1
  • [49] Relationships between metrics of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure
    E B Levitan
    N Kaciroti
    S Oparil
    S Julius
    P Muntner
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2013, 27 : 589 - 593
  • [50] Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and cardiovascular and kidney diseases
    Gluszek, Jerzy
    Kosicka, Teresa
    ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION, 2016, 20 (01): : 26 - 31