Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness

被引:2
|
作者
Landes, Scott D. [1 ,2 ]
Swenor, Bonnielin K. [3 ]
Hall, Jean P. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch Citizenship & Publ Affairs, Dept Sociol, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Aging Studies Inst, Maxwell Sch Citizenship & Publ Affairs, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Disabil Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Inst Hlth & Disabil Policy Studies, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Res & Training Ctr Independent Living, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
来源
HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR | 2024年 / 2卷 / 11期
关键词
disability; blindness; deafness; measurement; Washington Group functional limitation questions; data justice; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/haschl/qxae131
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) questions are intended to measure the severity of disability and disability status in US federal surveys. We used data from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Survey to examine the performance of the WGSS visual disability and hearing disability questions in capturing blindness and deafness. We found that the WGSS questions failed to capture 35.7% of blind adults and 43.7% of deaf respondents as having a severe disability, or, per their recommended cut point, as being disabled. Coupled with evidence demonstrating the poor performance of the WGSS questions in estimating the size of the overall disability population, we contend that results from this study necessitate a halt in the use of the WGSS questions to measure disability in US federal surveys.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MEASURING DEAFNESS IN NEWBORN BABIES
    MACEY, C
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 34 (MAR): : 110 - 110
  • [32] MEASURING DEAFNESS IN NEWBORN BABIES
    MACY, C
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 33 (OCT): : 395 - 395
  • [33] MEASURING DEAFNESS IN NEWBORN BABIES
    WEIR, CG
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 33 (DEC): : 456 - 456
  • [34] Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams - New questions in an old debate
    Hardin, AM
    Fuller, MA
    Valacich, JS
    SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2006, 37 (01) : 65 - 85
  • [35] Measuring the burden of childhood blindness
    Rahi, JS
    Gilbert, CE
    Foster, A
    Minassian, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (04) : 387 - 388
  • [36] Measuring Disability among Migrants with Washington Group Tools: Reflections for Field Use
    Tofani, Marco
    Galeoto, Giovanni
    Berardi, Anna
    Iorio, Silvia
    Conte, Antonella
    Fabbrini, Giovanni
    Valente, Donatella
    Marceca, Maurizio
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [37] Measuring disability in an urban slum community in India using the Washington Group questionnaire
    Mopari, Rahul
    Garg, Bhawna
    Puliyel, Jacob
    Varughese, Sara
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (02) : 263 - 268
  • [38] Are we measuring up ...? Questions on the performance of national statistical systems
    de Vries, W
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1999, 67 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [39] Deafness and blindness in a HIV-positive patient with cryptococcal meningitis
    Prada, JL
    TorreCisneros, J
    Kindelan, JM
    Jurado, R
    Villanueva, JL
    Navarro, M
    Linares, MJ
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 72 (851) : 575 - 575
  • [40] Blindness, deafness, quadriparesis, and a retinal malformation: The ravages of neurofibromatosis 2
    Rettele, GA
    Brodsky, MC
    Merin, LM
    Teo, C
    Glasier, CM
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 41 (02) : 135 - 141