Patient perceptions of their experience with comprehensive medication reviews: A framework for continued quality improvement

被引:0
|
作者
Castora-Binkley, Melissa [1 ]
Selvarajah, Shalini [1 ]
Felix, Mariana [2 ]
Campbell, Patrick J. [3 ]
Black, Heather [3 ]
Warholak, Terri [4 ]
Axon, David R. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Pharm Qual Alliance, Alexandria, VA 22315 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, NJ USA
[4] Univ Hlth Sci & Pharm, St Louis Coll Pharm, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon Res, HOPE Ctr, Coll Pharm, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
关键词
THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A comprehensive medication review (CMR) is an annual service offered to eligible Medicare Part D beneficiaries as a component of the Medication Therapy Management program. However, little is known about the most meaningful aspect of CMRs from the patient's perspective. This information is necessary to help improve the service. OBJECTIVE: To conduct concept elicitation interviews with patients who recently received a CMR to guide quality improvement efforts. METHODS: Those who recently received a telephonic CMR were invited to participate in semistructured interviews to provide their insights on the CMR service. An interview guide was used and contained the following 6 key questions (with additional probing questions) exploring: (1) overall experience, (2) medication knowledge, (3) concerns, (4) management, (5) satisfaction, and (6) experience. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 42 patients and resulted in the identification of themes related to the CMR service that were most meaningful to patients. The resulting framework contained 3 themes related to the content of the CMR (eg, medication review), the characteristics of the pharmacy professional (eg, professionalism), and the interaction during the CMR (eg, the telephonic experience). Intrinsic patient factors (eg, prior experiences) were also identified as important to contextualize patients' experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The framework provides concrete examples of the need for continued quality improvement of the CMR service and can be illustrated using the structure-process-outcome model. Patient perspectives should be accounted for in future quality improvement activities.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1394
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing patient-centred care: an ethnographic study of patient perceptions and influence on quality improvement
    Renedo, Alicia
    Marston, Cicely
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [32] Comprehensive medication reviews by ward-based pharmacists in Swedish hospitals: What does the patient have to say?
    Kempen, Thomas G. H.
    Kalvemark, Amanda
    Gillespie, Ulrika
    Stewart, Derek
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [33] Improving the assessment and documentation of patient mobility using a quality improvement framework
    Montgomery, Chandler D.
    Pereira, Daniel E.
    Hatcher, Jeremy B.
    Kilbury, Darlene
    Ballance, Stephanie
    Bradham, Tamala
    Duggan, Maria C.
    Welch, Sarah A.
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 42 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [34] Provider And Patient Perceptions To A Quality Improvement Intervention (solar) To Improve Sleep In The Icu
    Jain, S.
    Barnes, L.
    Bombei, C.
    Comried, L.
    Doerschug, K.
    Gehlbach, B. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [35] Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
    Siri Wiig
    Marianne Storm
    Karina Aase
    Martha Therese Gjestsen
    Marit Solheim
    Stig Harthug
    Glenn Robert
    Naomi Fulop
    BMC Health Services Research, 13
  • [36] Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
    Wiig, Siri
    Storm, Marianne
    Aase, Karina
    Gjestsen, Martha Therese
    Solheim, Marit
    Harthug, Stig
    Robert, Glenn
    Fulop, Naomi
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [37] National Patient Satisfaction Survey as a Predictor for Quality of Care and Quality Improvement - Experience and Practice
    Cui, Juan
    Du, Jing
    Zhang, Ning
    Liang, Zhanming
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2025, 19 : 193 - 206
  • [38] Embedding quality improvement and patient safety - the UCLA value analysis experience
    Gambone, Joseph C.
    Broder, Michael S.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 581 - 592
  • [39] Oncology Patient Portal Enrollment at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative
    McCleary, Nadine J.
    Greenberg, Teresa L.
    Barysauskas, Constance M.
    Guerette, Elissa J.
    Hassan, Malyun
    Jacobson, Joseph O.
    Schrag, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (08) : 490 - +
  • [40] LEADING FOR IMPROVEMENT - AN ESSENTIAL INGREDIENT IN QUALITY PATIENT CARE: A RESPIRATORY EXPERIENCE
    Kumar, S.
    Gittus, M.
    Cracknell, A.
    Miller, S. D. W.
    THORAX, 2015, 70 : A229 - A230