Technologies to support nursing students in learning Standardized Nursing Languages: A systematic literature review

被引:1
|
作者
Zeffiro, Valentina [1 ]
Tempesta, Salvatore [1 ]
Morandini, Roberta [1 ]
Alvaro, Rosaria [1 ]
Vellone, Ercole [1 ]
Pucciarelli, Gianluca [1 ]
D'Agostino, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy
[2] St Camillus Int Univ Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Med & Surg, Rome, Italy
关键词
educational outcomes; educational technology; nursing process; nursing students; Standardized Nursing Languages; CRITICAL THINKING; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; DECISION-MAKING; OMAHA SYSTEM; EDUCATION; DOCUMENTATION; CARE; SIMULATION; OUTCOMES; TERMINOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1111/2047-3095.70001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThis review identifies technologies used to teach Standardized Nursing Languages and their impact on nursing students' educational outcomes.MethodsA literature review, updated to June 14, 2024, was conducted by consulting the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The main inclusion criterion was primary studies in which technology was used to educate students on Standardized Nursing Languages.ResultsThree types of technology were addressed: Computerized Aids and Electronic Devices, Decision Support Systems, and Diagnostic Reasoning Software. Most of these technologies were found to positively impact knowledge, performance, application of the nursing process, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical reasoning.Conclusions and implications for nursing educationIntegrating technology into nursing education enhances nursing students' skills and equips them to handle the digital aspects of modern health care. Technologies must support all stages of the nursing process, reinforce clinical reasoning, and offer timely feedback. Additionally, the presence of teachers during technology training is crucial to ensure proper functioning, provide technical support, manage the learning environment, and verify students' skills. Nursing students with technological skills will become nurses capable of producing complete and quality clinical documentation and supporting their professional achievements. ObiettivoQuesta revisione identifica le tecnologie utilizzate per insegnare i linguaggi infermieristici standardizzati agli studenti del corso di laurea in Infermieristica e il loro impatto sui risultati educativi.Metodi & Egrave; stata condotta una revisione della letteratura, aggiornata al 14 giugno 2024, consultando i database PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus e Cochrane. Il principale criterio di inclusione era costituito da studi primari in cui la tecnologia veniva utilizzata per istruire gli studenti sui linguaggi infermieristici standardizzati.RisultatiSi & egrave; scoperto che la maggior parte di queste tecnologie ha un impatto positivo sulla conoscenza, sulle prestazioni, sull'applicazione del processo infermieristico, sull'accuratezza diagnostica e sul ragionamento clinico.Conclusioni e implicazioni per la formazione infermieristicaL'integrazione della tecnologia nella formazione infermieristica migliora le competenze degli studenti e li equipaggia per gestire gli aspetti digitali dell'assistenza sanitaria moderna. Le tecnologie devono supportare tutte le fasi del processo infermieristico, rafforzare il ragionamento clinico e offrire un feedback tempestivo. Inoltre, la presenza di docenti durante la formazione & egrave; fondamentale per garantire il corretto funzionamento della tecnologia, fornire supporto tecnico, gestire l'ambiente di apprendimento e verificare le competenze degli studenti. Gli studenti con competenze tecnologiche diventeranno infermieri in grado di produrre una documentazione clinica completa e di qualit & agrave; e supportare scientificamente i loro risultati professionali.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Moral sensitivity of nursing students: a systematic review
    Shadi, Abdollah Zargar
    Zohreh, Vanaki
    Eesa, Mohammadi
    Anoshirvan, Kazemnejad
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [32] The Influence of Journaling on Nursing Students: A Systematic Review
    Brown, Lynn Greenleaf
    Briscoe, Gina S.
    Grabowsky, Adelia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2022, 61 (01) : 29 - +
  • [33] Incivility in nursing education: A systematic literature review
    Eka, Ni Gusti Ayu
    Chambers, Derek
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2019, 39 : 45 - 54
  • [34] Simulation With Standardized Patients Designed as Interventions to Develop Nursing Students' Cultural Competence: A Systematic Review
    Qin, Yang
    Chaimongkol, Nujjaree
    JOURNAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING, 2021, 32 (06) : 778 - 789
  • [35] Team work in nursing: systematic literature review
    Abreu, Ludmila de Ornellas
    Munari, Denize Bouttelet
    Bezerra de Queiroz, Ana Lucia
    da Silva Fernandes, Carla Natalina
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2005, 58 (02) : 203 - 207
  • [36] Technologies used to support the nursing process: scoping review
    Tavares Chiavone, Flavia Barreto
    de Melo Paiva, Renilly
    Morales Moreno, Isabel
    Perez, Paloma Echevarria
    Feijao, Alexsandra Rodrigues
    Pereira Santos, Viviane Euzebia
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 34
  • [37] Key factors influencing undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the use of learning management systems: a systematic literature review
    Alkhuzaimi, Fathiya
    Wilson, Christine Brown
    Wong, Wai Yee Amy
    BMC NURSING, 2025, 24 (01):
  • [38] Nursing students' learning from involvement in research projects: an integrative literature review
    Loura, David de Sousa
    Bernardes, Rafael Alves
    Baixinho, Cristina Lavareda
    Henriques, Helga Rafael
    Felix, Isa Brito
    Guerreiro, Mara Pereira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2022, 75 (01)
  • [39] A Systematic Integrated Literature Review of Systematic Integrated Literature Reviews in Nursing
    Im, Eun-Ok
    Chang, Sun Ju
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (11) : 632 - U110
  • [40] Improving clinical experiences for nursing students in nursing homes: An integrative literature review
    Splitgerber, Hana
    Davies, Susan
    Laker, Sara
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2021, 52