Mitigating Cognitive Bias to Improve Organizational Decisions: An Integrative Review, Framework, and Research Agenda

被引:2
|
作者
Fasolo, Barbara [1 ]
Heard, Claire [2 ]
Scopelliti, Irene [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, London, England
[3] City St George Univ London, London, England
关键词
cognitive biases; bias mitigation; organizational decision-making; debiasing; choice architecture; dual interventions; training; decision-making process; managerial cognition; judgment and decision-making; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; HINDSIGHT BIAS; BLIND SPOT; ACCOUNTABILITY; JUDGMENT; CHOICE; ARCHITECTURE; INFORMATION; NUDGE; SELF;
D O I
10.1177/01492063241287188
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The detrimental influence of cognitive biases on decision-making and organizational performance is well established in management research. However, less attention has been given to bias mitigation interventions for improving organizational decisions. Drawing from the judgment and decision-making (JDM) literature, this paper offers a clear conceptualization of two approaches that mitigate bias via distinct cognitive mechanisms-debiasing and choice architecture-and presents a comprehensive integrative review of interventions tested experimentally within each approach. Observing a lack of comparative studies, we propose a novel framework that lays the foundation for future empirical research in bias mitigation. This framework identifies decision, organizational, and individual-level factors that are proposed to moderate the effectiveness of bias mitigation approaches across different contexts and can guide organizations in selecting the most suitable approach. By bridging JDM and management research, we offer a comprehensive research agenda and guidelines to select the most suitable evidence-based approach for improving decision-making processes and, ultimately, organizational performance.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Brand activism as a marketing strategy: an integrative framework and research agenda
    Pimentel, Pedro Chapaval
    Bassi-Suter, Mariana
    Didonet, Simone Regina
    JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (02) : 212 - 234
  • [42] Brand activism as a marketing strategy: an integrative framework and research agenda
    Pedro Chapaval Pimentel
    Mariana Bassi-Suter
    Simone Regina Didonet
    Journal of Brand Management, 2024, 31 : 212 - 234
  • [43] CEO Advice Seeking: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda
    Ma, Shenghui
    Kor, Yasemin Y.
    Seidl, David
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 46 (06) : 771 - 805
  • [44] International market, network, and opportunity selection: A systematic review of empirical research, integrative framework, and comprehensive research agenda
    Francioni, Barbara
    Martin, Oscar Martin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (05)
  • [45] Deepfakes: An Integrative Review of the Literature and an Agenda for Future Research
    Vasist, Pramukh Nanjundaswamy
    Krishnan, Satish
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 51 : 590 - 636
  • [46] Reconciling Perspectives on Clusters: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
    Speldekamp, Daniel
    Saka-Helmhout, Ayse
    Knoben, Joris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2020, 22 (01) : 75 - 98
  • [47] Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
    Somaya, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) : 1084 - 1114
  • [48] Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research
    Petelczyc, Claire Aislinn
    Capezio, Alessandra
    Wang, Lu
    Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.
    Aquino, Karl
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 44 (01) : 161 - 190
  • [49] Boardroom Dissent: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda
    Eirola, Aira
    Bezemer, Pieter-Jan
    Reinhold, Stephan
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2024,
  • [50] Pathways of Institutional Change: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
    Micelotta, Evelyn
    Lounsbury, Michael
    Greenwood, Royston
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (06) : 1885 - 1910