A Forward-Looking Assessment of Robotized Operation and Maintenance Practices for Offshore Wind Farms

被引:0
|
作者
Vieira, Henrique [1 ]
Castro, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, IST, INESC ID, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
offshore wind; human-based O&M; robot-based O&M; simulation tools; maintenance strategies; REMOTE INSPECTION;
D O I
10.3390/en18061508
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Operation and maintenance (O&M) activities represent a significant share of the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for offshore wind farms (OWFs), making cost reduction a key priority. Robotic-based solutions, leveraging aerial and underwater vehicles in a cooperative framework, offer the potential to optimize O&M logistics and reduce costs. Additionally, the deployment of persistent autonomous robotic systems can minimize the need for human intervention, enhancing efficiency. This study presents the development of an O&M cost calculator that integrates multiple modules: a weather forecast module to account for meteorological uncertainties, a failure module to model OWF failures, a maintenance module to estimate costs for both planned and unplanned activities, and a power module to quantify downtime-related losses. A forward-looking comparative economic analysis is conducted, assessing the cost-effectiveness of human-based versus robot-based inspection, maintenance, and repair (IMR) activities. The findings highlight the economic viability of robotic solutions in offshore wind O&M, supporting their potential role in reducing operational expenditures and improving energy production efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WAVE WEATHER WINDOWS IN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS AT HSINCHU AND CHANGHUA, TAIWAN
    Chang, Heng-Wen
    Maa, Ming-Jiun
    Lin, Ming-Chung
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2017, 25 (05): : 563 - 570
  • [42] Modelling and simulation of operation and maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms based on multi-agent system
    M’hammed Sahnoun
    David Baudry
    Navonil Mustafee
    Anne Louis
    Philip Andi Smart
    Phil Godsiff
    Belahcene Mazari
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019, 30 : 2981 - 2997
  • [43] Cost-benefit evaluation of remote inspection of offshore wind farms by simulating the operation and maintenance phase
    Netland, Oyvind
    Sperstad, Iver Bakken
    Hofmann, Matthias
    Skavhaug, Amund
    EERA DEEPWIND' 2014, 11TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, 2014, 53 : 239 - 247
  • [44] Forward-looking assessment of the GHG abatement cost: Application to China
    Dai, Sheng
    Zhou, Xun
    Kuosmanen, Timo
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)
  • [45] Towing Operation Methods of Offshore Integrated Meteorological Mast for Offshore Wind Farms
    Ding, Hongyan
    Hu, Ruiqi
    Le, Conghuan
    Zhang, Puyang
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [46] STOCHOS: Stochastic opportunistic maintenance scheduling for offshore wind farms
    Papadopoulos, Petros
    Coit, David W.
    Ezzat, Ahmed Aziz
    IISE TRANSACTIONS, 2024, 56 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [47] Holistic opportunistic maintenance scheduling and routing for offshore wind farms
    Si, Guojin
    Xia, Tangbin
    Gebraeel, Nagi
    Wang, Dong
    Pan, Ershun
    Xi, Lifeng
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 207
  • [48] NOWIcob - A tool for reducing the maintenance costs of offshore wind farms
    Hofmann, Matthias
    Sperstad, Iver Bakken
    DEEPWIND'2013 - SELECTED PAPERS FROM 10TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, 2013, 35 : 177 - 186
  • [49] An opportunistic joint maintenance strategy for two offshore wind farms
    Tao, Zijian
    Liu, Hanqiu
    Si, Yulin
    Wang, Chizhong
    Zhu, Ronghua
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 304
  • [50] A Model for the Optimization of the Maintenance Support Organization for Offshore Wind Farms
    Besnard, Francois
    Fischer, Katharina
    Tjernberg, Lina Bertling
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 4 (02) : 443 - 450