Barriers to adherence of posttreatment follow-up after positive primary cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Alemayehu, Rahel [1 ,2 ]
Stroetmann, Clara Yolanda [2 ]
Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rabe, Friedemann [2 ]
Addissie, Adamu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna [2 ,4 ]
Gizaw, Muluken [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Global Hlth Working Grp, Inst Med Epidemiol Biometr & Informat, Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[3] Addis Ababa Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, NCD Working Grp, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[4] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Gynaecol, Halle An Der Saale, Germany
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2024年
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
cervical cancer screening; adherence to follow-up; barriers; cryotherapy; Ethiopia; SINGLE-VISIT APPROACH; WOMEN; LESIONS; COHORT; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/oncolo/oyae305
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Even though it is preventable, cervical cancer contributes significantly to cancer-related mortality among Ethiopian women. Follow-up visits after treatment of precancerous lesions are essential to monitor lesion recurrence. In our previous study, we found a level of adherence to follow-up of 44.7%, but the reasons for low adherence have not been comprehensively explored within the Ethiopian context. This study aimed to identify these reasons by interviewing 167 women who had missed their follow-up appointments as well as 30 health professionals with experience in the field. Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach: Quantitative data were collected through a telephone questionnaire conducted with 167 women who had a positive visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and had missed their follow-up appointments. Subsequently, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 healthcare professionals, and an inductive content analysis was carried out. Results: In the patient interviews, the reasons given most often were "lack of information about the follow-up" (35; 21.1%), "forgetting the appointment" (30; 18.1%), and "not seeing the need for follow-up" (24; 14.5%). Healthcare professionals identified various reasons such as lack of knowledge, living in a remote area/changing living area, forgetfulness, fear, poor counseling, a shortage of trained healthcare providers to give counseling and follow-up, and reminder-related barriers. Conclusion: Lack of knowledge, forgetfulness, poor health-seeking behavior, and a lack of reminders were identified as barriers contributing to the low uptake of rescreening. Further interventions should target these by creating community awareness, improving patient counseling, tracing patients in need of follow-up, and making reminder calls or using SMS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Reasons for Loss to Follow-up in Pregnancy of Unknown Location: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Flynn, Anne N.
    McAllister, Arden
    Jen, Alicia
    Gutman, Sarah
    Allen, Antoinette
    Kete, Corinne
    Seth, Natasha
    Koelper, Nathanael
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 34 (01) : 118 - 124
  • [22] Delays in Recommended Follow-Up after Positive Findings in Lung Cancer Screening
    Ahmed, Alwiya
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Snidarich, Madison
    Crothers, Kristina
    Triplette, Matthew
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2023, 20 (08) : 1175 - 1181
  • [23] The Experiences of Cervical Cancer Patients During Follow-Up Care in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study
    Dirar, Anteneh
    Mekonnen, Wubegzier
    Berhanu, Zena
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 2507 - 2518
  • [24] Examinations of Adherence to Follow-Up Recommendations in Lung Cancer Screening
    Thayer, J. H.
    Crothers, K. A.
    Kross, E. K.
    Cole, A. M.
    Peterson, K.
    Madtes, D. K.
    Triplette, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [25] Adherence to follow-up after the exit cervical cancer screening test at age 60-64: A nationwide register-based study
    Jorgensen, Susanne F.
    Andersen, Berit
    Petersen, Lone Kjeld
    Rebolj, Matejka
    Njor, Sisse H.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01): : 224 - 237
  • [26] Delays in Follow-up after a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Exam Is the Benefit of Screening Compromised?
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Sakoda, Lori C.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2023, 20 (08) : 1102 - 1104
  • [27] Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women
    Catherine Duggan
    Gloria Coronado
    Javiera Martinez
    Theresa L Byrd
    Elizabeth Carosso
    Cathy Lopez
    Maria Benavides
    Beti Thompson
    BMC Cancer, 12
  • [28] Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women
    Duggan, Catherine
    Coronado, Gloria
    Martinez, Javiera
    Byrd, Theresa L.
    Carosso, Elizabeth
    Lopez, Cathy
    Benavides, Maria
    Thompson, Beti
    BMC CANCER, 2012, 12
  • [29] Developmental screening: predictors of follow-up adherence in primary health care
    Schoeman, Joanne Christine
    Swanepoel, De Wet
    van der Linde, Jeannie
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2017, 17 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [30] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AND CONDYLOMA - AN ANALYSIS OF DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF POSTTREATMENT FOLLOW-UP METHODS
    FALCONE, T
    FERENCZY, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 154 (02) : 260 - 264