Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility using Geospatial Techniques: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Statistical Models

被引:0
|
作者
Raut, Subrata [1 ]
Dutta, Dipanwita [1 ]
Bera, Debarati [1 ]
Samanta, Rajeeb [2 ]
机构
[1] Vidyasagar Univ, Dept Remote Sensing & GIS, Midnapore, W Bengal, India
[2] Prabhat Kumar Coll, Dept Geog, Contai, W Bengal, India
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
evident belief function; frequency ratio; geospatial datasets; Kalimpong; random forest; support vector machine; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FREQUENCY RATIO MODEL; BELIEF FUNCTION MODEL; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PROCESS AHP; DARJEELING HIMALAYA; NEURAL-NETWORKS; HAZARD; ZONATION; PARTS;
D O I
10.1002/gj.5080
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study delineates landslide susceptibility zones in the Kalimpong district by integrating multi-sensor datasets and assessing the effectiveness of statistical and machine learning models for precision mapping. The analysis utilises a comprehensive geospatial dataset, including remote sensing imagery, topographical, geological, and climatic factors. Four models were employed to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) using 16 influencing factors: two bivariate statistical models, frequency ratio (FR) and evidence belief function (EBF) and two machine learning models, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). Out of 1244 recorded landslide events, 871 events (70%) were used for training the models, and 373 events (30%) for validation. The distribution of susceptibility classes predicted by The RF and SVM models produced similar susceptibility distributions, predicting 13.30% and 14.30% of the area as highly susceptible, and 2.42% and 2.82% as very highly susceptible, respectively. In contrast, the FR model estimated 20.98% of the area as highly susceptible and 4.30% as very highly susceptible, whereas the EBF model predicted 17.42% and 5.89% for these categories, respectively. Model validation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed that the machine learning models (RF and SVM) had superior prediction accuracy with AUC values of 95.90% and 86.60%, respectively, compared to the statistical models (FR and EBF), which achieved AUC values of 74.30% and 76.80%. The findings indicate that Kalimpong-I is most vulnerable, with 6.76% of its area categorised as very high susceptibility and 24.80% as high susceptibility. Conversely, the Gorubathan block exhibited the least susceptible, with 0.95% and 6.48% of its area classified as very high and high susceptibility, respectively. This research provides essential insights for decision-makers and policy planners in landslide-prone regions and can be instrumental in developing early warning systems, which are vital for enhancing community safety through timely evacuations and preparedness measures.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Landslide susceptibility and building exposure assessment using machine learning models and geospatial analysis techniques
    Luu, Chinh
    Ha, Hang
    Tran, Xuan Thong
    Ha Vu, Thai
    Bui, Quynh Duy
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2024, 74 (11) : 5489 - 5513
  • [2] Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques
    Agboola, Gazali
    Beni, Leila Hashemi
    Elbayoumi, Tamer
    Thompson, Gary
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 81
  • [3] Exploring machine learning and statistical approach techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Siwalik Himalayan Region using geospatial technology
    Saha, Abhik
    Tripathi, Lakshya
    Villuri, Vasanta Govind Kumar
    Bhardwaj, Ashutosh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (07) : 10443 - 10459
  • [4] Identification and classification of landslide susceptible zone using geospatial techniques and machine learning models
    Ansar, Shameem A.
    Sudha, S.
    Francis, Suresh
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (27) : 18328 - 18355
  • [5] Effects of Variable Selection on the Landslide Susceptibility Assessment using Machine Learning Techniques
    Park, Soyoung
    Son, Sanghun
    Han, Jihye
    Lee, Seonghyeock
    Kim, Seongheon
    Kim, Jinsoo
    EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING/GIS APPLICATIONS X, 2019, 11156
  • [6] Comparative assessment of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping: a focus on validation and accuracy
    Abdelkader, Mohamed M.
    Csamer, Arpad
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2025,
  • [7] Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling
    Goetz, J. N.
    Brenning, A.
    Petschko, H.
    Leopold, P.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 81 : 1 - 11
  • [8] Performance evaluation of machine learning and statistical techniques for modelling landslide susceptibility with limited field data
    Ashokan Laila Achu
    Jobin Thomas
    Chandrika Dhanapalan Aju
    Praveen Kolappapillai Remani
    Girish Gopinath
    Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 1025 - 1039
  • [9] Performance evaluation of machine learning and statistical techniques for modelling landslide susceptibility with limited field data
    Achu, Ashokan Laila
    Thomas, Jobin
    Aju, Chandrika Dhanapalan
    Remani, Praveen Kolappapillai
    Gopinath, Girish
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (01) : 1025 - 1039
  • [10] Impact of sampling for landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable machine learning models
    Wu, Bin
    Shi, Zhenming
    Zheng, Hongchao
    Peng, Ming
    Meng, Shaoqiang
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 83 (11)