EMMY trial: What we know and what we need to know

被引:0
|
作者
Jaiswal, Arvind [1 ]
Chaurasia, Swati [2 ]
Pradhan, Akshyaya [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Eras Med Coll & Univ, Dept Physiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Pulm Med, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Empagliflozin; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; NT pro-BNP; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_361_24
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SGLT-2 inhibitors are a class of antidiabetic drugs with additional cardiovascular benefits. Though initially developed for glycemic control, subsequent studies in the heart failure (HF) population also demonstrated positive outcomes. Currently, they are approved for use in HF with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. More recently, encouraging data have emerged on acute HF. Following an episode of acute myocardial infarction, patients are also at high risk for developing HF and experiencing recurrent events despite optimal therapy. The PARADISE MI study failed to demonstrate any benefits of ARNI in this scenario. The EMMY trial explored the role of SGLT-2i in >450 odds patients with acute MI. At 26 weeks SGLT-2i (empagliflozin) use led to a higher fall in NT-pro-BNP levels compared to standard treatment. There was additional improvement in left ventricular echocardiographic parameters with empagliflozin too. However, it was a small trial, had a short follow-up and there were no clinical endpoints. But none the least, it attested to the safety of SGLT-2i in the post-MI scenario. Because the primary care physician frequently encounters patients in the post-MI scenario, the manuscript provides insights into their practice. Based on contemporary evidence, the universal use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients following acute MI is not warranted. A further role of these drugs in post-MI HF will be clarified in ongoing trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4145 / 4148
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LITERACY AND ELDERS - WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    RIGG, P
    KAZEMEK, F
    EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 1983, 9 (5-6) : 417 - 424
  • [22] What do we know? What do we need to know?
    Milena J. Henzlova
    W. Lane Duvall
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017, 24 : 252 - 254
  • [23] Gender and glaucoma: what we know and what we need to know
    Vajaranant, Thasarat S.
    Nayak, Sushma
    Wilensky, Jacob T.
    Joslin, Charlotte E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [24] Paediatric schistosomiasis: What we know and what we need to know
    Osakunor, Derick N. M.
    Woolhouse, Mark E. J.
    Mutapi, Francisca
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2018, 12 (02):
  • [25] Biome assembly: what we know and what we need to know
    Crisp, Mike
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (08) : 1332 - 1333
  • [26] BOOK LISTS - WHAT WE KNOW, WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    BAKER, SL
    RQ, 1993, 33 (02): : 177 - 180
  • [27] Angioedema: What We Know and What We Need to Know Foreword
    Alam, Rafeul
    IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 33 (04) : IX - X
  • [28] Nationalism: What We Know and What We Still Need to Know
    Mylonas, Harris
    Tudor, Maya
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 24, 2021, 2021, 24 : 109 - 132
  • [29] What do we know? What do we need to know?
    Henzlova, Milena J.
    Duvall, W. Lane
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 252 - 254
  • [30] HIV in adolescents: What we know and what we need to know
    Benton T.D.
    Ifeagwu J.A.
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2008, 10 (2) : 109 - 115