Emerging Cell-Based Gene Therapies in Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review of Casgevy and Lyfgenia

被引:0
|
作者
Fuad, Zainab [1 ]
Redha, Zainab A. [1 ]
Abuidrees, Aqeela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bahrain, Coll Hlth & Sport Sci, POB 32038, Zallaq, Bahrain
关键词
sickle cell disease; CRISPR/Cas9; exa-cel; lovo-cel;
D O I
10.21103/Article14(3)_RA2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: In 2023, the FDA approved two emerging cell-based gene therapies for the treatment of severe sickle cell disease (SCD): Casgevy and Lyfgenia. Casgevy utilizes the newer CRISPR/Cas9 technology, while Lyfgenia relies on a Lentiviral vector. These therapies consist of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in which the cells are genetically modified before infusing them back into the body. The study aim was to conduct a thorough systematic review to determine an efficient choice between Casgevy and Lyfgenia by comparing their ability to increase anti-sickling hemoglobin and eliminate vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), factoring in the adverse effects caused by each process. Methods and Results: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. Ten articles were analyzed and compared after searching PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Both therapy strategies were equally efficient in eliminating VOC and had similar effects on anti-sickling hemoglobin fractions. Their adverse effects are also similar and are related to the chemotherapy shared between autologous and allogenic transplants and not the gene therapies themselves, barring the occurrence of acute myeloid leukemia in 2 patients receiving the unmodified version of Lyfgenia. Conclusion: Casgevy and Lyfgenia are equally effective in their functions, although Casgevy appears to be the safer choice. However, the lack of follow-up for the patients in either gene therapy's respective trials leads to a lack of confidence in firm declarations.
引用
收藏
页数:182
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Affordable HIV and sickle cell disease gene therapies
    Mullard, Asher
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2019, 18 (12) : 895 - 895
  • [32] Cell-based therapies for metabolic liver disease
    Enns, Gregory M.
    Millan, Maria T.
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2008, 95 (1-2) : 3 - 10
  • [33] Prospects for cell-based therapies for liver disease
    Min, AD
    Theise, ND
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2004, 46 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [34] Cell-based therapies in Parkinson's disease
    Greene, Paul
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2009, 9 (04) : 292 - 297
  • [35] Cell-based therapies for neonatal lung disease
    O'Reilly, Megan
    Thebaud, Bernard
    CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 2017, 367 (03) : 737 - 745
  • [36] Cell-based therapies for Parkinson's disease
    Dyson, Sean C.
    Barker, Roger A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2011, 11 (06) : 831 - 844
  • [37] A review on disease modifying pharmacologic therapies for sickle cell disease
    Mahadevia, Himil
    Ponvilawan, Ben
    Madan, Ujjwal
    Sharma, Parth
    Qasim, Hana
    Shrestha, Anuj
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2025, : 881 - 893
  • [38] Cell-based Therapies for Equine Joint Disease
    Frisbie, David D.
    Stewart, Matthew C.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2011, 27 (02) : 335 - +
  • [39] Cell-based therapies for Huntington's disease
    Chen, Yiju
    Carter, Richard L.
    Cho, In K.
    Chan, Anthony W. S.
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2014, 19 (07) : 980 - 984
  • [40] Cell-based therapies for neonatal lung disease
    Megan O’Reilly
    Bernard Thébaud
    Cell and Tissue Research, 2017, 367 : 737 - 745