Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in a Rapidly Urbanizing River Basin Using a Modified DRASTIC Land Use-Lineament Density Method

被引:0
|
作者
Tsegay, Tsnat [1 ,2 ]
Birhanu, Behailu [2 ]
Azagegn, Tilahun [2 ]
Hailu, Biniyam Tesfaw [2 ,3 ]
Ayenew, Tenalem [2 ]
机构
[1] Mizan Tepi Univ, Geol Dept, Mizzan, Ethiopia
[2] Addis Ababa Univ, Coll Nat & Computat Sci, Sch Earth Sci, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Awash River basin; GIS; groundwater vulnerability to pollution; modified DRASTIC-LU-LD; WATER-QUALITY; MODEL; ETHIOPIA; NITRATE;
D O I
10.1002/gj.5059
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Groundwater quality assessment is crucial for ensuring safe drinking water, protecting public health, and maintaining sustainable water resources for agricultural and industrial uses. The Awash River basin faces significant groundwater quality challenges due to rapid population growth, high urbanization, large-scale irrigation, and industrial pollution. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the intrinsic vulnerability of aquifers to pollution in the Awash Basin and identify hotspots requiring urgent intervention using a modified DRASTIC overlay analysis method. In addition to the seven parameters considered in the generic DRASTIC overlay analysis (depth to the water table, recharge, aquifer media, slope, soil media, vadose zone, and hydraulic conductivity), we incorporated land use/land-cover (LULC) and lineament density (LD) distributions (DRASTIC-LU-LD). This modification allowed us to produce more realistic groundwater vulnerability maps for the basin. To identify the most influential parameters in the overlay, sensitivity analysis was conducted using Map Removal Sensitivity Analysis (MRSA) and Single Parameter Sensitivity Analysis (SPSA). Initially, the generic DRASTIC index in the area ranges from 69 to 181, categorizing the area into four vulnerability zones: very low (21%), low (51%), medium (27%), and high (1%). After incorporating LU and LD, the index values ranged from 90 to 240. Based on the percentage of the total area studied, the inclusion of LU decreased the very low and low vulnerability zones from 72% to 44% and the inclusion of LD increased the high- and very-high-vulnerability zones from 14% to 27%. The areas most vulnerable to groundwater pollution are in the western (upper Awash), middle Awash, and northwestern regions, particularly in city centers where groundwater abstraction is significant. These high-vulnerability zones coincide with municipal, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources. The vadose zone parameter has the highest impact in both MRSA and SPSA, with a variation index value of 3.08% and a mean effective weight of 27.93%, respectively. By identifying areas vulnerable to groundwater pollution, this study provides a valuable basis for informed decision-making and the development of effective strategies for protecting groundwater from urban, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources.
引用
收藏
页码:3278 / 3295
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mapping Intrinsic Vulnerability to Pollution Using the DRASTIC Method in the Temara Groundwater (Northwestern Morocco)
    Taazzouzte, Mariam
    Ghafiri, Abdessamad
    Lemacha, Hassan
    El Moutaki, Saida
    Haidara, Imane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 12 (04)
  • [22] Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran
    Aminreza Neshat
    Biswajeet Pradhan
    Saied Pirasteh
    Helmi Zulhaidi Mohd Shafri
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 71 : 3119 - 3131
  • [23] GIS-based DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC techniques for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution in Torghabeh-Shandiz of Khorasan County, Iran
    Fazel Amiri
    Tayebeh Tabatabaie
    Mehri Entezari
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [24] GIS-based DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC techniques for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution in Torghabeh-Shandiz of Khorasan County, Iran
    Amiri, Fazel
    Tabatabaie, Tayebeh
    Entezari, Mehri
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [25] Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran
    Neshat, Aminreza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Pirasteh, Saied
    Shafri, Helmi Zulhaidi Mohd
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 71 (07) : 3119 - 3131
  • [26] Groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk assessment of the Weining Plain, using a modified DRASTIC model and quantized pollution loading method
    Li, Xinyan
    Gao, Yanyan
    Qian, Hui
    Wu, Hao
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (21)
  • [27] Groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk assessment of the Weining Plain, using a modified DRASTIC model and quantized pollution loading method
    Xinyan Li
    Yanyan Gao
    Hui Qian
    Hao Wu
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [28] GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR NITRATE POLLUTION BASED ON MODIFIED DRASTIC METHOD: A CASE STUDY IN SOUTHWEST CHINA
    Tian, H.
    Xiao, C. L.
    Xu, H. G.
    Liang, X. J.
    Zhao, H.
    Zhao, Q. Z.
    Qiao, L. T.
    Zhang, W. L.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (03): : 2339 - 2358
  • [29] Groundwater vulnerability to pollution in degraded coal mining areas: modifying the DRASTIC method using the factor of exploitation impact on land surface
    Krogulec, Ewa
    Bukowski, Przemyslaw
    Niedbalska, Katarzyna
    Trzeciak, Joanna
    Zablocki, Sebastian
    GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 49 (04): : 313 - 334
  • [30] Groundwater vulnerability to pollution in the semi-arid Vattamalaikarai River Basin of south India thorough DRASTIC index evaluation
    Arya, S.
    Subramani, T.
    Vennila, G.
    Roy, Priyadarsi D.
    GEOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 80 (04):