Evolution of Gleason Score Prostate - A Review

被引:0
|
作者
Bansal, Cherry [1 ]
Anand, Gurupriya [2 ]
Goyal, Anshika [3 ]
机构
[1] Dr SS Tantia Med Coll Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Pathol, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
[2] SGL Superspecial Charitable Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
[3] GGS Med Coll & Hosp, Faridkot, Punjab, India
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Gleason Score; ISUP; Review; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; UROLOGICAL-PATHOLOGY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PATTERN; CRIBRIFORM CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CRIBRIFORM; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s13193-025-02251-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Gleason grading system was first introduced in the 1960s by Dr. Donald Gleason and has since been used worldwide for the grading of prostate cancer. Over the years it has undergone several modifications but has still retained its status as the most popular scoring system for prostate. Using a systematic literature review, we aim to highlight the changes the Gleason scoring has undergone, their strengths and limitations as well the future directives. Gleason scoring underwent major changes from its original conception in the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) consensus meetings held in 2005, 2014 and 2019. The latest change in Gleason scoring makes it possible to report the scoring, help alleviate patient anxiety and has shown good reproducibility and less inter-user variability. Gleason scoring system is a popular tool among pathologists and clinicians alike owing to its flexibility, utility and dependability. With advancements in the medical field and the use of artificial intelligence, it is expected to undergo further tempering.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GLEASON SCORE AT POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN IN PROSTATE CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Lysenko, Ivan
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Janisch, Florian
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Quhal, Fahad
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1132 - E1132
  • [32] COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL BETWEEN PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 3 AND PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 4 FOR BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCER
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ulchaker, James
    Angermeier, Kenneth
    Altman, Andrew
    Chehade, Nabil
    Mahadevan, Arul
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (05): : 1439 - 1445
  • [33] A comparison of the Gleason score and clinical stage preoperatively with the Gleason score and pathological stage postoperatively in patients with relapsed prostate cancer
    Kechagioglou, P.
    Ioannidou, G.
    Georgakopoulos, I.
    Alexopoulou, E.
    Katsilieris, I.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 : 112 - 112
  • [34] Effect of the number of core biopsies of the prostate: On predicting Gleason score of prostate cancer
    Thickman, D
    Speers, WC
    Philpott, PJ
    Shapiro, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (01): : 110 - 113
  • [35] Prostate Specific Antigen Level and Gleason Score in Indonesian Prostate Cancer Patients
    Herawan, Muhammad Imam Al Kautsar
    Adriansjah, Ricky
    MAJALAH KEDOKTERAN BANDUNG, 2024, 56 (03): : 209 - 213
  • [36] The use of autoantibody signatures for the prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score
    Bradford, TJ
    Wang, XJ
    Wang, R
    Yu, JJ
    Ghosh, D
    Wei, JT
    Chinnaiyan, AM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 274 - 274
  • [37] Multimodal Radiomic Features for the Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Kucharczyk, Michael J.
    Niazi, Tamim
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [38] Metabolomics of Prostate Cancer Gleason Score in Tumor Tissue and Serum
    Penney, Kathryn L.
    Tyekucheva, Svitlana
    Rosenthal, Jacob
    El Fandy, Habiba
    Carelli, Ryan
    Borgstein, Stephanie
    Zadra, Giorgia
    Fanelli, Giuseppe Nicolo
    Stefanizzi, Lavinia
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Pomerantz, Mark
    Peisch, Samuel
    Coulson, Hannah
    Lis, Rosina
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Umeton, Renato
    Loda, Massimo
    MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (03) : 475 - 484
  • [39] Impact of reporting rules of biopsy Gleason score for prostate cancer
    Kuroiwa, K.
    Uchino, H.
    Yokomizo, A.
    Naito, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (03) : 260 - 263
  • [40] Gleason Score 6-Prostate Cancer or Benign Variant?
    Knuechel, Ruth
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 38 (12) : 629 - 632