Development and application of a machine learning-based antenatal depression prediction model

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Chunfei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Hongmei [2 ]
Xu, Yupin [3 ]
Fu, Xukun [4 ]
Qiu, Xiaojing [5 ]
Hu, Siqian [2 ]
Jin, Tong [2 ]
Xu, Hualin [2 ]
Luo, Qiong [6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoxing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 222 Fenglin East Rd, Shaoxing 312000, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sussex, Sch Engn & Informat, Brighton, England
[4] Shaoxing Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Med Record, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Shengzhou Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Nursing, Shengzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet, 1st Xueshi Rd, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
关键词
Antenatal depression; Machine learning; Prediction model; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; POSTNATAL DEPRESSION; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.099
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antenatal depression (AND), occurring during pregnancy, is associated with severe outcomes. However, there is a lack of objective and universally applicable prediction methods for AND in clinical practice. We leveraged sociodemographic and pregnancy-related data to develop and validate a machine learning-based AND prediction model. Methods: Data from 20,950 pregnant women form 3 hospitals were used and divided into training and test sets. AND was defined as an EPDS score of 10 or above. Using machine learning, we selected 34 characteristic variables and divided them into three categories based on clinical practice: Base Variables, General Variables, and Obstetric Variables. Based on this classification, we constructed four different AND random forest prediction models: the Base Model, the Base+General Model, the Base+Obstetric Model, and the Full Model. Results: The AUC range in the test set was 0.687-0.710. The Base+General Model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.710 (95 % CI: 0.693-0.710) in predicting AND risk during the late pregnancy period. The AUC of the Base Model was only 0.022 lower than that of the top-performing model, indicating its solid foundation for early AND screening. Limitations: We have only analyzed the dataset from two eastern cities, and have not yet validated our models in an external dataset. Conclusions: Machine learning-based prediction models offer the capability to anticipate the risk of AND across different pregnancy stages. This enables the earlier and more accurate identification of pregnant women who may be at risk, facilitating timely interventions for improving outcomes for both mothers and their offspring.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning-based prediction model and visual interpretation for prostate cancer
    Chen, Gang
    Dai, Xuchao
    Zhang, Mengqi
    Tian, Zhujun
    Jin, Xueke
    Mei, Kun
    Huang, Hong
    Wu, Zhigang
    BMC UROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Developing an Explainable Machine Learning-Based Thyroid Disease Prediction Model
    Arjaria, Siddhartha Kumar
    Rathore, Abhishek Singh
    Chaubey, Gyanendra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ANALYTICS, 2022, 9 (03)
  • [43] Machine Learning-based Model for Early Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease
    Ahmad, Nabeel
    Yadav, Sudeept Singh
    Moharana, Alok Kumar
    CARDIOMETRY, 2022, (24): : 373 - 378
  • [44] Fuel consumption cost prediction model for ro-ro carriers: a machine learning-based application
    Su, Miao
    Lee, HeeJeong Jasmine
    Wang, Xueqin
    Bae, Sung-Hoon
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2025, 52 (02) : 229 - 249
  • [45] Machine learning-based prediction of illness course in major depression: The relevance of risk factors
    Teutenberg, Lea
    Stein, Frederike
    Thomas-Odenthal, Florian
    Usemann, Paula
    Brosch, Katharina
    Winter, Nils
    Goltermann, Janik
    Leenings, Ramona
    Konowski, Maximilian
    Barkhau, Carlotta
    Fisch, Lukas
    Meinert, Susanne
    Flinkenfluegel, Kira
    Schuermeyer, Navid
    Bonnekoh, Linda
    Thiel, Katharina
    Kraus, Anna
    Alexander, Nina
    Jansen, Andreas
    Nenadic, Igor
    Straube, Benjamin
    Hahn, Tim
    Dannlowski, Udo
    Jamalabadi, Hamidreza
    Kircher, Tilo
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2025, 374 : 513 - 522
  • [46] Machine Learning-based BGP Traffic Prediction
    Farasat, Talaya
    Rathore, Muhammad Ahmad
    Khan, Akmal
    Kim, JongWon
    Posegga, Joachim
    2023 IEEE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, TRUSTCOM, BIGDATASE, CSE, EUC, ISCI 2023, 2024, : 1925 - 1934
  • [47] Machine learning-based prediction models in neurosurgery
    Habashy, Karl J.
    Arrieta, Victor A.
    Feghali, James
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2023, 55 (03)
  • [48] Machine Learning-based Prediction of Test Power
    Dhotre, Harshad
    Eggersgluess, Stephan
    Chakrabarty, Krishnendu
    Drechsler, Rolf
    2019 IEEE EUROPEAN TEST SYMPOSIUM (ETS), 2019,
  • [49] Machine Learning-based Water Potability Prediction
    Alnaqeb, Reem
    Alrashdi, Fatema
    Alketbi, Khuloud
    Ismail, Heba
    2022 IEEE/ACS 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2022,
  • [50] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Air Quality
    Liang, Yun-Chia
    Maimury, Yona
    Chen, Angela Hsiang-Ling
    Juarez, Josue Rodolfo Cuevas
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 17