Cartoons in Scholarly Publishing: Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

被引:0
|
作者
Benlidayi, Ilke Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-01380 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Caricature; Cartoon; Medical Writing; Scholarly Communication;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e83
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cartoons in scholarly publishing are effective ways to improve communication and engagement. They can transform scientific concepts into visually interesting and easy- to-understand formats, thereby helping the concepts reach to larger groups more easily. Depending on the type of cartoons (concept cartoons, humor illustrations, and editorial cartoons), benefits may vary. It is recommended to maintain relevance, elegance, and quality in cartoon presentations. Potential insults must be carefully avoided to maintain respectful communication. The objectives of the current article were to examine the complex roles of cartoons in scholarly publishing, to provide recommendations for drawing scientific cartoons, and to discuss challenges in incorporating cartoons into scientific publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2018, 16 (01):
  • [12] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Blackmore, Heather
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (11) : 1409 - 1417
  • [13] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    Heather Blackmore
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31
  • [14] Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Akazhanov, Nurbek A.
    Kitas, George D.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (06) : 600 - 608
  • [15] Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines
    Malicki, Mario
    Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan
    Bouter, Lex
    Mulligan, Adrian
    ter Riet, Gerben
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [16] Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors
    Memon, Aamir Raoof
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (27)
  • [17] Academic publishing: Communication among editors, reviewers, publishers and authors. Publishing with fuel processing technology or publishing with etransportation
    Li, Chun-Zhu
    Mi, Chunting
    Fu, Jinxia
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [18] Disrupting Racism and Global Exclusion in Academic Publishing: Recommendations and Resources for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
    Ledgerwood, Alison
    Lawson, Katherine M.
    Kraus, Michael W.
    Vollhardt, Johanna Ray
    Remedios, Jessica D.
    Westberg, Dulce Wilkinson
    Uskul, Ayse K.
    Adetula, Adeyemi
    Leach, Colin Wayne
    Martinez, Joel E.
    Naumann, Laura P.
    Reddy, Geetha
    Tate, Charlotte Chucky
    Todd, Andrew R.
    Weltzien, Katherine
    Buchanan, Nicole
    Gonzalez, Roberto
    Doble, L. James Montilla
    Romero-Canyas, Rainer
    Westgate, Erin
    Zou, Linda X.
    COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [19] Academic publishing: Communication among editors, reviewers, publishers and authors. Publishing with progress in energy and combustion science, or publishing with joule
    Wang, Hai
    Earis, Philip
    Fu, Jinxia
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [20] Peer Reviewers and Their Critical Contributions to Scholarly Publishing
    Avery, Melissa D.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (03) : 293 - 294