Nipple Position and Clinical Outcomes Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Examination of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction Utilizing 3D Imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Stern, Carrie S. [1 ,2 ]
Graziano, Francis D. [1 ]
White, Donovan R. [2 ]
Shammas, Ronnie L. [1 ]
Plotsker, Ethan L. [2 ]
Smith-Montes, Elizabeth [2 ]
Boe, Lillian [3 ]
Levy, Jacob [2 ]
Moo, Tracy-Ann [4 ]
Sacchini, Virgilio [4 ]
Allen, Robert J. [1 ]
Mehrara, Babak J. [1 ]
Nelson, Jonas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Breast Serv, New York, NY USA
关键词
BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; MALPOSITION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjaf004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, the impact of prepectoral vs subpectoral implant reconstruction on nipple position, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after NSM remains unknown. Objective: We hypothesized that prepectoral reconstruction would lead to a more anatomic nipple position and improved clinical outcomes and PROs when compared to subpectoral reconstruction following NSM. Methods: Surgical characteristics, complications, and PROs in NSM patients with implant-based reconstruction from 2018 to 2021 were prospectively collected. Nipple displacement from baseline was analyzed with 3-dimensional (3D) surface imaging. Results: In total 216 patients underwent 391 NSMs, separated into subpectoral (n = 96) and prepectoral (n = 120) cohorts. There were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between cohorts. Prepectoral placement showed a greater incidence of short-term return to the operating room (21% vs 10%, P = .026). Three-dimensional analysis of 96 patients and 175 nipple positions was conducted. Compared to preoperative baseline, 3D imaging at 12 months postoperatively showed that the subpectoral cohort had greater straight-line distance between the nipples (23.1 mm vs 17.3 mm, P < .001) and more lateral nipple displacement (9.2 mm vs 6.1 mm, P < .001) when compared to the prepectoral cohort. Regression analysis found no relationship between incision pattern and nipple displacement. No postoperative differences were seen in PROs. Conclusions: Subpectoral NSM reconstruction was found to have more lateralized nipple displacement when compared to prepectoral patients, regardless of the incision pattern employed. Nipple displacement after NSM can play a significant role in postoperative aesthetic appearance and should be considered when deciding implant plane.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prepectoral direct to implant reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy using the TiLOOP bra pocket
    Thill, Marc
    van Haasteren, Viviane
    Kelling, Katharina
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [42] Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques
    Kwiecien, Grzegorz J.
    Coombs, Demetrius M.
    Cakmakoglu, Cagri
    Bernard, Steven
    Fanning, Alicia
    Moreira, Andrea
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (01) : 140E - 141E
  • [43] Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques
    Mosharrafa, Ali M.
    Mosharrafa, Tamir M.
    Zannis, Victor J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (05) : 1125 - 1133
  • [44] Salvage of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies With Autologous Flaps
    Qureshi, Ali A.
    Oliver, Jeremie D.
    Parikh, Rajiv P.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (07) : 734 - 741
  • [45] Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical outcomes and risk factors related complications
    Laporta, Rosaria
    Longo, Benedetto
    Sorotos, Michail
    Farcomeni, Alessio
    Patti, Caterina
    Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria
    Rubino, Corrado
    di Pompeo, Fabio Santanelli
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2017, 51 (06) : 427 - 435
  • [46] Outcomes Using Two Unique Methods of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Ptotic Patients
    Erlichman, Zachary
    Buro, Justin
    Waraich, Minah
    Veeramachaneni, Haritha
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (6S) : S477 - S482
  • [47] Mastectomy flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction: An evaluation of tumescence and sharp dissection technique on surgical outcomes
    Ng, Troy
    Knowles, Sarah
    Brackstone, Muriel
    Doherty, Chris
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06): : 1079 - 1083
  • [48] Comment on ‘‘Hook Shape’’ Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series
    Bishara Atiyeh
    Saif Emsieh
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024, 48 : 1 - 3
  • [49] Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: Risk Factors and the Success of Conservative Treatment
    Dent, Briar L.
    Small, Kevin
    Swistel, Alexander
    Talmor, Mia
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (04) : 560 - 570
  • [50] Comment on ''Hook Shape'' Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series
    Atiyeh, Bishara
    Emsieh, Saif
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (01) : 1 - 3