Nipple Position and Clinical Outcomes Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Examination of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction Utilizing 3D Imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Stern, Carrie S. [1 ,2 ]
Graziano, Francis D. [1 ]
White, Donovan R. [2 ]
Shammas, Ronnie L. [1 ]
Plotsker, Ethan L. [2 ]
Smith-Montes, Elizabeth [2 ]
Boe, Lillian [3 ]
Levy, Jacob [2 ]
Moo, Tracy-Ann [4 ]
Sacchini, Virgilio [4 ]
Allen, Robert J. [1 ]
Mehrara, Babak J. [1 ]
Nelson, Jonas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Breast Serv, New York, NY USA
关键词
BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; MALPOSITION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjaf004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, the impact of prepectoral vs subpectoral implant reconstruction on nipple position, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after NSM remains unknown. Objective: We hypothesized that prepectoral reconstruction would lead to a more anatomic nipple position and improved clinical outcomes and PROs when compared to subpectoral reconstruction following NSM. Methods: Surgical characteristics, complications, and PROs in NSM patients with implant-based reconstruction from 2018 to 2021 were prospectively collected. Nipple displacement from baseline was analyzed with 3-dimensional (3D) surface imaging. Results: In total 216 patients underwent 391 NSMs, separated into subpectoral (n = 96) and prepectoral (n = 120) cohorts. There were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between cohorts. Prepectoral placement showed a greater incidence of short-term return to the operating room (21% vs 10%, P = .026). Three-dimensional analysis of 96 patients and 175 nipple positions was conducted. Compared to preoperative baseline, 3D imaging at 12 months postoperatively showed that the subpectoral cohort had greater straight-line distance between the nipples (23.1 mm vs 17.3 mm, P < .001) and more lateral nipple displacement (9.2 mm vs 6.1 mm, P < .001) when compared to the prepectoral cohort. Regression analysis found no relationship between incision pattern and nipple displacement. No postoperative differences were seen in PROs. Conclusions: Subpectoral NSM reconstruction was found to have more lateralized nipple displacement when compared to prepectoral patients, regardless of the incision pattern employed. Nipple displacement after NSM can play a significant role in postoperative aesthetic appearance and should be considered when deciding implant plane.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Outcomes of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Perez-Alvarez, Idanis
    Fan, Kenneth
    Greenwalt, Ian
    Song, David
    Sosin, Michael
    Bartholomew, Alex
    King, Caroline
    Tousimis, Eleni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S511 - S512
  • [2] Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Case Report
    Rathat, Gauthier
    Herlin, Christian
    Bonnel, Christophe
    Captier, Guillaume
    Duraes, Martha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS, 2019, 20 : 1812 - 1816
  • [3] Prepectoral versus retropectoral implant-based reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy
    Cox, Solange
    Bozzuto, Laura
    Bartholomew, Alex
    Sosin, Michael
    Pittman, Troy
    Wiley, Shawna
    Tousimis, Eleni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 587 - 588
  • [4] Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Avila, Azalia
    Bartholomew, Alex J.
    Sosin, Michael
    Deldar, Romina
    Griffith, Kayla F.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Song, David H.
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Tousimis, Eleni A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (06) : 715E - 720E
  • [5] Do Nipple Necrosis Rates Differ in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
    Braun, Sterling E.
    Dreicer, Mollie
    Butterworth, James A.
    Larson, Kelsey E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 4760 - 4766
  • [6] Modified goldilocks nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant-based reconstruction: a case report
    Bovill, John D.
    Deldar, Romina
    Wang, Jessica
    Greenwalt, Ian
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (05) : 927 - 931
  • [7] Reduced acute complications associated with implant-based prepectoral reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Griffith, Kayla
    Batholomew, Alex
    Deldar, Romina
    Avila, Azalia
    Grace, Lassiter
    Perez-Alvarez, Idanis
    Thibodeau, Renee
    Sosin, Mike
    Willey, Shawna
    Pittman, Troy
    Tousimis, Eleni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 153 - 154
  • [8] Do Nipple Necrosis Rates Differ in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
    Sterling E. Braun
    Mollie Dreicer
    James A. Butterworth
    Kelsey E. Larson
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4760 - 4766
  • [9] Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Alcon, Andre
    Rosser, Micaela
    Gedallovich, Jodi
    Foster, Robert D.
    Sbitany, Hani
    Piper, Merisa L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (02) : 273 - 280
  • [10] Symmetry of Nipple Position After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction The Impact of Reconstructive Method
    Mercury, Oblaise
    Nores, Gabriella Garcia
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (05) : S422 - S426