Enduring outcomes of minimally ınvasive approaches for facial rejuvenation

被引:0
|
作者
Elif Sari [1 ]
Aynur Aliyeva [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydın University VM Medikal Park Florya Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Yeditepe University,Head and Neck Surgery
[3] The Catholic University St.Mary Hospital Medical Center,Neuroscience Doctoral Program
关键词
Facial rejuvenation; Minimally invasive procedures; Patient satisfaction; Botulinum toxin; Dermal fillers; PRP; PDO threads;
D O I
10.1007/s00403-025-04238-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Facial rejuvenation procedures have gained popularity as individuals seek nonsurgical methods to address signs of aging. These procedures encompass a range of minimally invasive techniques, including botulinum toxin applications, dermal fillers, PRP, and thread lifting. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of these minimal invasive facial rejuvenation procedures. Patients aged 18–65 who underwent facial rejuvenation at an Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic were included. Procedures had botulinum toxin applications, dermal fillers, PRP, and PDO threads. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 4–6 months for botulinum toxin and PRP and one year for other procedures. Visual analog scales and self-satisfaction measured beauty perception data after treatments. Botulinum toxin applications effectively reduced dynamic wrinkles, while dermal fillers provided volumetric support with varying longevity. PRP improved skin tone, brightness, moisture, and fine wrinkles. Patient satisfaction levels varied across procedures. Minimal invasive facial rejuvenation procedures offer a nonsurgical approach to address aging-related concerns. Botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, PRP, and PDO threads provide unique benefits, but their outcomes and satisfaction levels differ among patients. Understanding these variations is crucial for informed decision-making in facial rejuvenation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning Approaches for Prediction of Facial Rejuvenation Using Real and Synthetic Data
    Shah, Syed Afaq Ali
    Bennamoun, Mohammed
    Molton, Michael K.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 23779 - 23787
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Periorbital Rejuvenation
    Hoenig, Jonathan
    Hoenig, Danya
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 29 (04) : 295 - 309
  • [33] Non-Traditional and Non-Invasive Approaches in Facial Rejuvenation: A Brief Review
    Smith, Abigail M.
    Ferris, Taylor
    Nahar, Vinayak K.
    Sharma, Manoj
    COSMETICS, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [34] Outcomes in Thread Lift for Facial Rejuvenation: a Study Performed with Happy Lift™ Revitalizing
    Savoia A.
    Accardo C.
    Vannini F.
    Di Pasquale B.
    Baldi A.
    Dermatology and Therapy, 2014, 4 (1) : 103 - 114
  • [35] Facial rejuvenation/restoration: Sequencing of nonsurgical treatment options for optimal outcomes - Foreword
    Werschler, Wm. Philip
    DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2007, 20 : S4 - S4
  • [36] Lower Facial Rejuvenation Preface
    Rozen, Shai N.
    Ishii, Lisa E.
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 45 (04) : IX - X
  • [37] Combining microneedling with other minimally invasive procedures for facial rejuvenation: a split-face comparative study
    El-Domyati, Moetaz
    Abdel-Wahab, Hossam
    Hossam, Aliaa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 57 (11) : 1324 - 1334
  • [38] Lasers for facial rejuvenation: a review
    Papadavid, E
    Katsambas, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 (06) : 480 - 487
  • [39] Preface Male Facial Rejuvenation
    Lam, Samuel M.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 32 (03) : 0xi - 0xi
  • [40] BONE EXPANSION IN FACIAL REJUVENATION
    VICUNA, RG
    GIOTTONINI, AS
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 18 (01) : 85 - 90