Development and validation of a 14-CpG DNA methylation signature and drug targets for prognostic prediction in breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tian, Bao-xing [1 ]
Yu, Zhi-xi [2 ]
Qiu, Xia [3 ]
Chen, Li-ping [3 ]
Zhuang, Yu-lian [4 ]
Chen, Qian [4 ]
Gu, Yan-hua [4 ]
Hou, Meng-jie [2 ]
Gu, Yi-fan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Tongren Hosp, Hongqiao Int Inst Med, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Shanghai Key Lab Tissue Engn,Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Tongren Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Tongren Hosp, Dept Nursing, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
breast cancer; prognostic model; DNA methylation; biomarker; TCGA; GEO; EXPRESSION; GENE; BIOMARKER; ARRAY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2025.1548726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer among women and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that DNA methylation, a well-studied epigenetic modification, regulates various cellular processes critical for cancer development and progression and holds promise as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, potentially enhancing the efficacy of precision therapies.Methods We developed a robust prognostic model for BC based on DNA methylation and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We analyzed the association of the model with clinicopathological features, survival outcomes, and chemotherapy drug sensitivity.Results A set of 216 differentially methylated CpGs was identified by intersecting three datasets (TCGA, GSE22249, and GSE66695). Using univariate Cox proportional hazard and LASSO Cox regression analyses, we constructed a 14-CpG model significantly associated with progression-free interval (PFI), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) in BC patients. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and nomogram validation confirmed the clinical value of the signature. The Cox analysis showed a significant association between the signature and PFI and DSS in BC patients. KM analysis effectively distinguished high-risk from low-risk patients, while ROC analysis demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in predicting BC prognosis. A nomogram based on the signature effectively predicted 5- and 10-year PFI and DSS. Additionally, combining our model with clinical risk factors suggested that patients in the I-II & M+ subgroup could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy regarding PFI, DSS, and OS. Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses indicated that the top 3,000 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched in pathways related to DNA replication and repair and cell cycle regulation. Patients in the high-risk group might benefit from drugs targeting DNA replication and repair processes in tumor cells.Conclusion The 14-CpG model serves as a useful biomarker for predicting prognosis in BC patients. When combined with TNM staging, it offers a potential strategy for individualized clinical decision-making, guiding personalized therapeutic regimen selection for clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An 18-gene signature based on glucose metabolism and DNA methylation improves prognostic prediction for urinary bladder cancer
    Liu, Zhuonan
    Sun, Tianshui
    Zhang, Zhe
    Bi, Jianbin
    Kong, Chuize
    GENOMICS, 2021, 113 (01) : 896 - 907
  • [42] Identification and validation of prognostic signature genes of bladder cancer by integrating methylation and transcriptomic analysis
    Dipankor Chatterjee
    Sadia Islam Mou
    Tamanna Sultana
    Md. Ismail Hosen
    Md. Omar Faruk
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [43] Identification and validation of prognostic signature genes of bladder cancer by integrating methylation and transcriptomic analysis
    Chatterjee, Dipankor
    Mou, Sadia Islam
    Sultana, Tamanna
    Hosen, Md. Ismail
    Faruk, Md. Omar
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [44] Development of an Immune-Related Prognostic Signature in Breast Cancer
    Xie, Peiling
    Ma, Yuying
    Yu, Shibo
    An, Rui
    He, Jianjun
    Zhang, Huimin
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 10
  • [45] Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram Based on DNA Methylation-Driven Genes for Patients With Ovarian Cancer
    Zhou, Min
    Hong, Shasha
    Li, Bingshu
    Liu, Cheng
    Hu, Ming
    Min, Jie
    Tang, Jianming
    Hong, Li
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [46] Blood DNA methylation profiles improve breast cancer prediction
    Kresovich, Jacob K.
    Xu, Zongli
    O'Brien, Katie M.
    Shi, Min
    Weinberg, Clarice R.
    Sandler, Dale P.
    Taylor, Jack A.
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2022, 16 (01) : 42 - 53
  • [47] Epigenetic Changes Due to DNA Methylation in CpG Islands during Breast Cancer Progression
    Dimitrova, N.
    Gorthi, A.
    Prasada, S. K.
    Chakrabarty, S.
    Keswarpu, P.
    Banerjee, N.
    Janevski, A.
    Kiradi, P. H.
    Khandige, S.
    Satyamoorthy, K.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [48] Development and Validation of a Novel Radiosensitivity Signature in Human Breast Cancer
    Speers, Corey
    Zhao, Shuang
    Liu, Meilan
    Bartelink, Harry
    Pierce, Lori J.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (16) : 3667 - 3677
  • [49] Profiling of DNA methylation signature for different phases of prostate cancer development
    Chang, Michelle
    Liem, Natalia
    Goh, Liang Kee
    Kalaw, Emarene
    Lim, Pei Li
    Geronimo, Carla
    Sim, Allen
    Huang, Hong Hong
    Chong, Tsung Wen
    Tan, Puay Hoon
    Soong, Richie
    Cheng, Christopher
    Sim, Hong Gee
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [50] A DNA methylation signature for the prediction of tumour recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer
    Min Li
    Congcong Zhu
    Ying Xue
    Changhong Miao
    Ruiping He
    Wei Li
    Baolong Zhang
    Wenqiang Yu
    Xingxu Huang
    Minzhi Lv
    Ye Xu
    Qihong Huang
    British Journal of Cancer, 2023, 128 : 1681 - 1689