Study on cementitious grout for scour protection of offshore wind turbine foundations

被引:1
|
作者
Sha, Fei [1 ]
Gu, Shijiu [1 ]
Xu, Jingze [1 ]
Dong, Yulong [1 ]
Xia, Chenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Engn Coll, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cementitious grout; sodium silicate; polyurethane; scour resistance performance; marine foundation engineering; SODIUM-SILICATE; POLYURETHANE; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/1064119X.2024.2411728
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
To study scour-resistant applicability, 6-10% mass ratio of polyurethane (PU) was added to sulphoaluminate cement (SAC) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) grouts to generate OPCPU and SACPU. Sodium silicate (SS) with slurry volume ratio of 1:1-5:1 was added to SAC and OPC grouts to generate OPCSS and SACSS. The water-cement ratio (w/c) of grout was 0.8-1.5. Fresh-state properties and mechanical properties were investigated. Hydrated minerals and microstructures were analyzed, scouring tests were conducted considering key formulations. The results indicated that SACSS and OPCSS have a shorter setting time and higher strength, which makes them suitable as scour resistance materials. At the w/c of 1.0, OPCSS with a volume ratio of 3:1 and SACPU with 6% PU were selected for scour resistance tests. It showed that maximum scour depths and sediment transports were 7.0-12.2 and 1.1-1.2% as those without reinforcing conditions. The critical shear stress on the seabed under reinforcement is similar to 103 times greater than the bed shear stress. This inhibits the occurrence of scouring. The study evaluated the applicability of cementitious reinforcement for scour resistance. This study analyzed material and mechanical properties, hydrated minerals, and microstructures, and conducted scour tests to optimize grouting material ratios for seabed scour protection, providing references for soil reinforcement and grouting protection.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sinking failure of scour protection at wind turbine foundation
    Sumer, B. Mutlu
    Nielsen, Anders W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENERGY, 2013, 166 (04) : 170 - 188
  • [32] Load calculation methods for offshore wind turbine foundations
    Passon, Patrik
    Branner, Kim
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2014, 9 (04) : 433 - 449
  • [33] Design and construction considerations for offshore wind turbine foundations
    Mallhotra, Sanjeev
    Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol 5, 2007, : 635 - 647
  • [34] Cyclic deformations of foundations for offshore wind turbine structures
    Wienbroer, H.
    Huber, G.
    Triantafyllidis, Th.
    PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2010, : 715 - 720
  • [35] Offshore wind turbine monopile foundations: Design perspectives
    Gupta, Bipin K.
    Basu, Dipanjan
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 213
  • [36] Numerical study on the effects of scour on monopile foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines: The case of Robin Rigg wind farm
    Menendez-Vicente, Carlos
    Lopez-Querol, Susana
    Bhattacharya, Subhamoy
    Simons, Richard
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 167
  • [37] Scour protection for offshore wind energy generators in the North Sea
    Heerten, Georg
    Peters, Karsten
    GEOTECHNIK, 2011, 34 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [38] SCOUR ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENTS FOR PILE-SUPPORTED WIND TURBINE FOUNDATIONS
    Stuyts, Bruno
    Cathie, David
    Xie, Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING - 2013 - VOL 6, 2013,
  • [39] Seismic vibration mitigation of offshore wind turbine considering scour depth
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Jiawang
    Gui, Chunyi
    Li, Jingbo
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43 (16): : 136 - 145
  • [40] DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF OFFSHORE MONOPILE WIND TURBINE INCLUDING THE EFFECT OF SCOUR
    Li, Hui
    Ong, Muk Chen
    Leira, Bernt J.
    Myrhaug, Dag
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 7, 2013, : 517 - 524