Suffusion of irregular concave gap-graded sand with resolved CFD-DEM

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yajing [1 ]
Yin, Zhen-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
海南省自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
suffusion; concave particle; resolved CFD-DEM; particle rotation; PARTICLE-SHAPE; SIMULATIONS; GENERATION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1139/cgj-2024-0215
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The complex morphologies of particles are a crucial factor influencing suffusion in gap-graded granular soils. However, the micro-mechanism of soil suffusion composed of irregular concave particles remains unclear. To this end, a systematic numerical simulation that considers particle concavity and aspect ratio is performed with the resolved discrete element method (DEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. The macro responses of suffusion of particles with varying morphologies, e.g., cumulative eroded particle mass and sample profile, are revealed and interpreted from a microscopic view, e.g., particle rotation, average number of contact points, and moment. It is found that the rotation of irregularly shaped particles during suffusion requires overcoming the moment applied by the surrounding particles. Particles with bigger contact force or irregularity require a higher moment to be overcome, thus significantly increasing their suffusion resistance. Irregularly shaped particles can adjust their orientation to reduce the moment and drag force applied to them. At the same aspect ratio, particles with larger concavity are more likely to interlock with each other, with increasing the average number of contact points of the soil packing and shrinking the pore channel for particle migration. A shape parameter considering both concavity and aspect ratio is finally proposed to characterise the influence on suffusion.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A coupled CFD-DEM investigation into hydro-mechanical behaviour of gap-graded soil experiencing seepage erosion considering cyclic hydraulic loading
    Zhang, Peiyun
    Mu, Linlong
    Huang, Maosong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 624
  • [42] A resolved CFD-DEM investigation into sand production under water flooding in unconsolidated reservoir
    Wang, Tuo
    Chen, Shihang
    Li, Mengli
    An, Mengke
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 442
  • [43] A resolved CFD-DEM investigation on granular sand sedimentation considering realistic particle shapes
    Hu, Gaoyang
    Zhou, Bo
    Shen, Zhihao
    Wang, Huabin
    Zheng, Wenbo
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2024,
  • [44] Internal erosion by suffusion on cohesionless gap-graded soils: Model and sensibility analysis
    Gelet, Rachel
    Marot, Didier
    GEOMECHANICS FOR ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31
  • [45] One dimensional compression of gap-graded mixtures in DEM
    Nguyen Hop Minh
    Cheng, Yi Pik
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICS: FROM MICRO TO MACRO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 727 - 731
  • [46] Transmission effect of eroded particles in suffusion using the CFD-DEM coupling method
    Fan Chen
    Hao Xiong
    Xiang Wang
    Zhen-Yu Yin
    Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18 : 335 - 354
  • [47] Transmission effect of eroded particles in suffusion using the CFD-DEM coupling method
    Chen, Fan
    Xiong, Hao
    Wang, Xiang
    Yin, Zhen-Yu
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2023, 18 (01) : 335 - 354
  • [48] CFD-DEM modeling of suffusion effect on undrained behavior of internally unstable soils
    Hu, Z.
    Yang, Z. X.
    Zhang, Y. D.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 126
  • [49] Interface control for resolved CFD-DEM with capillary interactions
    Nguyen, Giang T.
    Chan, Ei L.
    Tsuji, Takuya
    Tanaka, Toshitsugu
    Washino, Kimiaki
    ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 32 (05) : 1410 - 1425
  • [50] Mechanical Consequences of Suffusion on Undrained Behaviour of a Gap-Graded Cohesionless Soil - An Experimental Approach
    Mehdizadeh, Amirhassan
    Disfani, Mahdi M.
    Evans, Robert
    Arulrajah, Arul
    Ong, D. E. L.
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2017, 40 (06): : 1026 - 1042