Utilization of artificial intelligence to triage patients with delayed follow-up of probably benign breast ultrasound findings

被引:0
|
作者
Amir, Tali [1 ]
Coffey, Kristen [1 ]
Reiner, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Sevilimedu, Varadan [2 ]
Mango, Victoria L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Serv, 300 East 66Th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Breast ultrasonography; Decision support systems; clinical; COVID-19; Triage;
D O I
10.14366/usg.24206
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e., probably benign) breast ultrasound assessment from August 2019-December 2019 whose follow-up was delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose breast ultrasounds were re-reviewed using Koios DS Breast AI as part of the clinical workflow for triaging these patients. The output of Koios DS was compared with the true outcome of a presence or absence of breast cancer defined by resolution/stability on imaging follow-up for at least 2 years or pathology results. Results: The study included 161 women (mean age, 52 years) with 221 BI-RADS category 3 sonographic lesions. Of the 221 lesions, there were two confirmed cancers (0.9% malignancy rate). Koios DS assessed 112/221 lesions (50.7%) as benign, 42/221 lesions (19.0%) as probably benign, 64/221 lesions (29.0%) as suspicious, and 3/221 lesions (1.4%) as probably malignant. Koios DS had a sensitivity of 100% (2/2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 100%), specificity of 70% (154/219; 95% CI, 64% to 76%), negative predictive value of 100% (154/154; 95% CI, 98% to 100%), and false-positive rate of 30% (65/219; 95% CI, 24% to 36%). Conclusion: When many follow-up appointments are delayed, e.g., natural disaster, or scenarios where resources are limited, breast ultrasound AI DS can help triage patients with probably benign breast ultrasounds.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Follow-up of Probably Benign Lesions (BI-RADS 3 category) in Breast MR Imaging
    Hauth, Elke
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kuemmel, Sherko
    Kimmig, Rainer
    Forsting, Michael
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (03): : 297 - 304
  • [22] NONPALPABLE, PROBABLY BENIGN BREAST-LESIONS - FOLLOW-UP STRATEGIES AFTER INITIAL DETECTION ON MAMMOGRAPHY
    ADLER, DD
    HELVIE, MA
    IKEDA, DM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (06) : 1195 - 1201
  • [23] Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies
    Shin, Susanna
    Schneider, Heather B.
    Cole, Frederick J., Jr.
    Laronga, Christine
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (05): : 413 - 417
  • [24] Can Follow-up be Avoided for Probably Benign US Masses with No Enhancement on MRI?
    Daly Avendano
    Maria Adele Marino
    Natsuko Onishi
    Doris Leithner
    Danny F. Martinez
    Peter Gibbs
    Maxine Jochelson
    Katja Pinker
    Elizabeth A. Morris
    Elizabeth Jane Sutton
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 975 - 982
  • [25] Preventing Delayed and Missed Care by Applying Artificial Intelligence to Trigger Radiology Imaging Follow-up
    Domingo, Jane
    Galal, Galal
    Huang, Jonathan
    Soni, Priyanka
    Mukhin, Vladislav
    Altman, Camila
    Bayer, Tom
    Byrd, Thomas
    Caron, Stacey
    Creamer, Patrick
    Gilstrap, Jewell
    Gwardys, Holly
    Hogue, Charles
    Kadiyam, Kumar
    Massa, Michael
    Salamone, Paul
    Slavicek, Robert
    Suna, Michael
    Ware, Benjamin
    Xinos, Stavroula
    Yuen, Lawrence
    Moran, Thomas
    Barnard, Cynthia
    Adams, James G.
    Etemadi, Mozziyar
    NEJM CATALYST INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [27] Can Follow-up be Avoided for Probably Benign US Masses with No Enhancement on MRI?
    Avendano, Daly
    Marino, Maria Adele
    Onishi, Natsuko
    Leithner, Doris
    Martinez, Danny F.
    Gibbs, Peter
    Jochelson, Maxine
    Pinker, Katja
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Sutton, Elizabeth Jane
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 975 - 982
  • [28] Value of close follow-up for "probably benign findings," BIRADS category 3 (MR-Bi3), on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast (BrMR)
    Janicek, M. J.
    Camaya, V. M.
    Naddaff, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [29] Artificial Intelligence in the Identification, Management, and Follow-Up of CKD
    Tangri, Navdeep
    Ferguson, Thomas W.
    KIDNEY360, 2022, 3 (03): : 554 - 556
  • [30] BENIGN BREAST SURGERY - IS THERE A NEED FOR OUTPATIENT FOLLOW-UP
    WAKEFIELD, SE
    POWIS, SJA
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1995, 77 (06) : 457 - 459