Congruence of cancer screening recommendations between the USPSTF and the top ten US cancer centers: a cross sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Wright, Kristin [1 ]
Shkabari, Brian [2 ]
Booth, Christopher [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knopf, Kevin [4 ]
Tregear, Michelle [5 ]
Gyawali, Bishal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Natl Breast Canc Coalit, Washington, DC USA
关键词
USPSTF; Guidelines; Top Ten US Cancer Centers; Cancer screening; Cancer diagnosis; Overdiagnosis; OVERDIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103169
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent volunteer organization of multi-disciplinary national experts in disease prevention that publishes evidence-based guidelines for cancer screening. However, these guidelines are not binding and many individual cancer centers publish their own screening recommendations. Methods This cross-sectional study compared the congruence of cancer screening recommendations between the USPSTF and the Top Ten US Cancer Centers as per the U.S News and World Report 2022-2023 for colorectal (CRC), lung (LC), cervical (CC), prostate (PC), and breast cancers (BC) in average risk patients. The evaluated variables included screening tests, recommendation direction, strength, frequency, age of start, age of end, and discussion/quantification of risks and benefits. Findings Our study identified substantial variability between the screening recommendations from the Top Ten US Cancer Centers and the evidence based USPSTF guidelines for BC, PC, and CC. The discordance was almost always in the direction of the cancer centers recommending more screening beyond the USPSTF's recommendations, and without discussion of potential risks and harms. For LC and CRC, the guidelines were generally concordant between the cancer centers and USPSTF. Interpretation Top Ten US Cancer Centers make screening recommendations inconsistent with those of the USPSTF recommendations, with cancer centers generally recommending more screening and omitting a nuanced discussion of benefits and risks. Given the national and international reputation of these cancer centers, their recommendations can have important population level implications, including confusion in the public. Funding None. Copyright (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice
    Gaylis, Franklin D.
    Choi, Jae E.
    Hamilton, Zachary
    Dato, Paul
    Cohen, Edward
    Calabrese, Renee
    Prime, Hilary
    Rosenbaum, Aaron
    Kader, Andrew Karim
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (11) : 663.e1 - 663.e7
  • [42] Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility
    Pu, Chan Yeu
    Lusk, Christine M.
    Neslund-Dudas, Christine
    Gadgeel, Shirish
    Soubani, Ayman O.
    Schwartz, Ann G.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [43] Deep Learning to Optimize Candidate Selection for Lung Cancer CT Screening: Advancing the 2021 USPSTF Recommendations
    Lee, Jong Hyuk
    Lee, Dongheon
    Lu, Michael T.
    Raghu, Vineet K.
    Park, Chang Min
    Goo, Jin Mo
    Choi, Seung Ho
    Kim, Hyungjin
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (01) : 209 - 218
  • [44] Determinants of adherence to physical cancer rehabilitation guidelines among cancer patients and cancer centers: a cross-sectional observational study
    Charlotte IJsbrandy
    Petronella B. Ottevanger
    Winald R. Gerritsen
    Wim H. van Harten
    Rosella P. M. G. Hermens
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2021, 15 : 163 - 177
  • [45] Determinants of adherence to physical cancer rehabilitation guidelines among cancer patients and cancer centers: a cross-sectional observational study
    IJsbrandy, Charlotte
    Ottevanger, Petronella B.
    Gerritsen, Winald R.
    van Harten, Wim H.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2021, 15 (01) : 163 - 177
  • [46] The correlation between individuals’ attitudes toward cancer screening, cancer information overload, and healthy life awareness: a cross-sectional study
    Melike Demir Doğan
    Seda Kurt
    Berkay Ertin
    Journal of Public Health, 2024, 32 : 759 - 764
  • [47] The correlation between individuals' attitudes toward cancer screening, cancer information overload, and healthy life awareness: a cross-sectional study
    Dogan, Melike Demir
    Kurt, Seda
    Ertin, Berkay
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 32 (05): : 759 - 764
  • [48] Association between e-cigarette use and depression in US cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study
    Godfred O. Antwi
    Darson L. Rhodes
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2023, 17 : 1452 - 1460
  • [49] Association between e-cigarette use and depression in US cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study
    Antwi, Godfred O.
    Rhodes, Darson L.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2023, 17 (05) : 1452 - 1460
  • [50] Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in Egypt: a nationwide cross-sectional study
    Allam, Abdallah R.
    Elsayed, Mostafa A.
    Daghash, Ibrahim Tawfiq
    Abdelaziz, Ali M.
    Mostafa, Omnia M.
    Sabra, Hamdy Khaled
    Eldaboush, Ahmed Monib
    Ahmed, Noor Maged Badrawy
    Elweza, Rawan Tarek
    Adwy, Enas Sherif
    Hammad, Abdelrahman Elbendary
    Kabbash, Ibrahim Ali
    Allam, Ahmed Hafez
    Bahbah, Ammar Ayman
    Ewis, Marwa Ibrahim
    Mohamed Shawqi, Mohamed
    Behery, Mostafa B.
    Mohamed El-Said, Yara
    Radwan, Ahmed Eid
    Khallafallah, Mahmoud T.
    Aboshady, Omar Ali
    Gouda, Mohamed A.
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)