Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries

被引:0
|
作者
Zurovac, Jelena [1 ]
Shin, Eunhae [3 ]
Earlywine, Joel [2 ]
Ghosh, Arkadipta [2 ]
Brown, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Mathematica Inc, 1100 1st St NE,12th Floor, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[2] Mathematica Inc, POB 2393, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 100 Foster Rd, Athens, GA 30622 USA
关键词
Opioids; Opioid overuse; Long-term opioid use; Primary care transformation; Comprehensive Primary Care Plus; Medicare; DRUG-MONITORING PROGRAMS; UNITED-STATES; RISK; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.josat.2024.209621
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: To examine if Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) practices had a greater decrease in the potential overuse of prescription opioids relative to beneficiaries attributed to other primary care practices. Primary care practices that participated in CPC+ received enhanced Medicare payment to support five functions: access and continuity of care, care management, comprehensiveness and coordination, patient and caregiver engagement, and planned care and population health. CPC+ practices participated within two tracks starting in 2017; Track 2 practices received larger payments to support more enhanced care delivery than Track 1 practices. Methods: Employing difference-in-differences, we used Medicare claims and Part D data to examine changes in potential opioid overuse between 2016 (baseline) and 2021 (the fifth program year). Our measure of potential opioid overuse measure relies on specifications for an existing quality measure of the same name that is defined as filling opioid prescriptions at a daily dosage of 90 morphine milligram equivalents or more among beneficiaries who use opioids for at least 90 days of supply per year. A total of 40,219 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 2888 CPC+ practices; 129,178 beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 6921 comparison practices. Results: Across the combined treatment and comparison groups, potential opioid overuse decreased from 19 % in 2016 to 12 % in 2021. Relative to the comparison group, beneficiaries attributed to Track 1 CPC+ practices experienced an 0.8 percentage point greater decrease in potential opioid overuse (95 % CI = -1.4, -0.2) in the third program year compared to baseline. These findings persisted in the fourth and fifth years and were similar in magnitude to those in the third year. Track 2 results were similar to Track 1 results. The findings were likely driven by changes in CPC+ clinicians' prescribing behaviors: clinicians in CPC+ practices reduced the average dosage and the number of days' supply of prescription opioids more than clinicians in comparison practices. Conclusions: A large-scale primary care delivery transformation initiative was associated with reduced potential opioid overuse among Medicare beneficiaries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Association between Opioid Prescribing in Medicare and Pharmaceutical Company Gifts by Physician Specialty
    Mara A. G. Hollander
    Julie M. Donohue
    Bradley D. Stein
    Elizabeth E. Krans
    Marian P. Jarlenski
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 2451 - 2458
  • [42] The Association Between the Supply of Nonpharmacologic Providers, Use of Nonpharmacologic Pain Treatments, and High-risk Opioid Prescription Patterns Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain
    Karmali, Ruchir N.
    Skinner, Asheley C.
    Trogdon, Justin G.
    Weinberger, Morris
    George, Steven Z.
    Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
    MEDICAL CARE, 2020, 58 (05) : 433 - 444
  • [43] The relationship between care patterns and receipt of ICDs among medicare beneficiaries
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    Greiner, Melissa A.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (21) : E429 - E429
  • [44] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DUAL-TRAJECTORIES OF OPIOID AND GABAPENTINOID USE AND HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES AMONG UNITED STATES MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES
    Zhou, L.
    Bhattacharjee, S.
    Kwoh, C. K.
    Malone, D.
    Tighe, P.
    Reisfield, G. M.
    Slack, M.
    Lo-Ciganic, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S172 - S173
  • [45] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ASSIGNMENT TO AN ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION AND QUALITY OF CARE AND OUTCOMES AMONG MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES HOSPITALIZED FOR HEART FAILURE
    Luo, Nancy
    Hammill, Bradley
    DeVore, Adam
    Xu, Haolin
    Fonarow, Gregg
    Hernandez, Adrian
    Matsouaka, Roland
    Albert, Nancy
    Yancy, Clyde
    Mentz, Robert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 913 - 913
  • [46] Association between insurance cost-sharing subsidy and postoperative opioid prescription refills among Medicare patients
    Kirsch, Michael
    Montgomery, John R.
    Hu, Hsou Mei
    Englesbe, Michael
    Hallstrom, Brian
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Waljee, Jennifer F.
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [47] The association of ambulatory care with breast cancer stage at diagnosis among medicare beneficiaries
    Nancy L. Keating
    Mary Beth Landrum
    John Z. Ayanian
    Eric P. Winer
    Edward Guadagnoli
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 38 - 44
  • [48] The association of ambulatory care with breast cancer stage at diagnosis among medicare beneficiaries
    Keating, NL
    Landrum, MB
    Ayanian, JZ
    Winer, EP
    Guadagnoli, E
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [49] Opioid prescribing patterns among generalists & oncologists for Medicare Part D beneficiaries from 2013-2017.
    Royce, Trevor Joseph
    Roberts, Andrew
    Dusetzina, Stacie
    Agarwal, Ankit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [50] Changes in Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Generalists and Oncologists for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries From 2013 to 2017
    Agarwal, Ankit
    Roberts, Andrew
    Dusetzina, Stacie B.
    Royce, Trevor J.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (08) : 1271 - 1274