Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services - An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Heiss, Irina [1 ]
Stegmann, Friederike [1 ]
Wolf, Matteo [1 ]
Volk, Martin [1 ]
Kaim, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Agri-environmental and climate schemes; Ecosystem services; Water quality; Carbon sequestration; Biodiversity; Drought protection; Maps; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; ORGANIC-CARBON; AGROFORESTRY; HETEROGENEITY; BIODIVERSITY; QUALITY; DEMAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113212
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) - the benefits people obtain from ecosystems - are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Therefore, the spatial targeting of suitable agri-environmental schemes (subsidized by the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU) is needed to address degraded ES in specific areas. To study the interrelations and spatial patterns of ES and agricultural management, there is no compromise between time- and data-intense process-based models and rather simple ES maps based on land use types and single proxies. Therefore, we propose an opportunity map approach, which enables both regional overview and field-specific evaluation on where ES can be improved through agricultural management changes. For this purpose, we developed evaluation criteria and scores for site conditions, management data from 2022 and other spatial environmental parameters based on literature research and expert interviews. These evaluation criteria were assigned scores indicating the opportunity to improve the ES "provision of clean water", "habitat provision", "carbon sequestration" and "water regulation" (approximated by drought protection) through altered management. Individual criteria were developed for each ES and weights for the ES criteria resulted from expert interviews using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Except for the management data, all spatial data sets were publicly available. The study region of Northwest Saxony, Germany - an intensively cultivated agricultural area - showed an overall high opportunity to improve ES through management changes. The highest opportunities were identified for the ES "provision of clean water" and "habitat provision". This novel approach is fast, reproducible and can be transferred to and adapted for other German regions and ES. Therefore, it helps decision-makers to spatially target management suggestions and to support information campaigns or subsidy schemes for management practices with positive impacts on ES.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Agricultural Landscapes: A Pattern-Process-Design Approach to Enhance Their Ecological Quality and Ecosystem Services through Agroforestry
    Vagge, Ilda
    Sgalippa, Nicolo
    Chiaffarelli, Gemma
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2024, 16 (07):
  • [22] Ecosystem services of the soil food web after long-term application of agricultural management practices
    Zhang, Xiaoke
    Ferris, Howard
    Mitchell, Jeffrey
    Liang, Wenju
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 111 : 36 - 43
  • [23] More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services
    Tähti Pohjanmies
    Kyle Eyvindson
    María Triviño
    Mikko Mönkkönen
    Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 2337 - 2349
  • [24] More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services
    Pohjanmies, Tahti
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    Trivino, Maria
    Monkkonen, Mikko
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (12) : 2337 - 2349
  • [25] A generic approach to evaluate costs and effectiveness of agricultural Beneficial Management Practices to improve water quality management
    Zammali, Mohamed Khalil
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Shupena-Soulodre, Etienne
    Lindenschmidt, Karl-Erich
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 287
  • [26] Assessing the Impact of Farm-Management Practices on Ecosystem Services in European Agricultural Systems: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
    Van Ruymbeke, Kato
    Ferreira, Joana G.
    Gkisakis, Vasileios D.
    Kantelhardt, Jochen
    Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana
    Matthews, Peter
    Niedermayr, Andreas
    Schaller, Lena
    Bankowska, Katarzyna
    Mertens, Kewan
    Vranken, Liesbet
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [27] Assessing the effects of agricultural management practices on carbon fluxes: Spatial variation and the need for replicated estimates of Net Ecosystem Exchange
    Davis, P. A.
    Brown, J. Clifton
    Saunders, M.
    Lanigan, G.
    Wright, E.
    Fortune, T.
    Burke, J.
    Connolly, J.
    Jones, M. B.
    Osborne, B.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (04) : 564 - 574
  • [28] Measuring the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Alternative Soil and Nutrient Management Practices: A Transdisciplinary, Field-Scale Approach
    White, Alissa
    Faulkner, Joshua W.
    Conner, David
    Barbieri, Lindsay
    Adair, E. Carol
    Niles, Meredith T.
    Mendez, V. Ernesto
    Twombly, Cameron R.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [29] Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services to improve protected area management: a multi-method approach applied to Catalonia, Spain
    Maestre-Andres, Sara
    Calvet-Mir, Laura
    van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (03) : 717 - 731
  • [30] Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services to improve protected area management: a multi-method approach applied to Catalonia, Spain
    Sara Maestre-Andrés
    Laura Calvet-Mir
    Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh
    Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16 : 717 - 731