Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services - An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Heiss, Irina [1 ]
Stegmann, Friederike [1 ]
Wolf, Matteo [1 ]
Volk, Martin [1 ]
Kaim, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Agri-environmental and climate schemes; Ecosystem services; Water quality; Carbon sequestration; Biodiversity; Drought protection; Maps; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; ORGANIC-CARBON; AGROFORESTRY; HETEROGENEITY; BIODIVERSITY; QUALITY; DEMAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113212
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) - the benefits people obtain from ecosystems - are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Therefore, the spatial targeting of suitable agri-environmental schemes (subsidized by the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU) is needed to address degraded ES in specific areas. To study the interrelations and spatial patterns of ES and agricultural management, there is no compromise between time- and data-intense process-based models and rather simple ES maps based on land use types and single proxies. Therefore, we propose an opportunity map approach, which enables both regional overview and field-specific evaluation on where ES can be improved through agricultural management changes. For this purpose, we developed evaluation criteria and scores for site conditions, management data from 2022 and other spatial environmental parameters based on literature research and expert interviews. These evaluation criteria were assigned scores indicating the opportunity to improve the ES "provision of clean water", "habitat provision", "carbon sequestration" and "water regulation" (approximated by drought protection) through altered management. Individual criteria were developed for each ES and weights for the ES criteria resulted from expert interviews using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Except for the management data, all spatial data sets were publicly available. The study region of Northwest Saxony, Germany - an intensively cultivated agricultural area - showed an overall high opportunity to improve ES through management changes. The highest opportunities were identified for the ES "provision of clean water" and "habitat provision". This novel approach is fast, reproducible and can be transferred to and adapted for other German regions and ES. Therefore, it helps decision-makers to spatially target management suggestions and to support information campaigns or subsidy schemes for management practices with positive impacts on ES.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Modeling the Supporting Ecosystem Services of Depressional Wetlands in Agricultural Landscapes
    David M. Mushet
    Cali L. Roth
    Wetlands, 2020, 40 : 1061 - 1069
  • [2] Modeling the Supporting Ecosystem Services of Depressional Wetlands in Agricultural Landscapes
    Mushet, David M.
    Roth, Cali L.
    WETLANDS, 2020, 40 (05) : 1061 - 1069
  • [3] Implications of land management practices on selected ecosystem services in the agricultural landscapes of Ethiopia: a review
    Biratu, Abera Assefa
    Bedadi, Bobe
    Gebrehiwot, Solomon Gebreyohannis
    Hordofa, Tilahun
    Asmamaw, Desale Kidane
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 21 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [4] Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes: A Spatially Explicit Approach to Support Sustainable Soil Management
    Forouzangohar, Mohsen
    Crossman, Neville D.
    MacEwan, Richard J.
    Wallace, D. Dugal
    Bennett, Lauren T.
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [5] Evolving opportunities for management of agricultural landscapes and ecosystem health: Sustainability by opportunity
    Dumanski, J
    Joffe, S
    Terry, ER
    Pieri, C
    MANAGING FOR HEALTHY ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, : 333 - 342
  • [6] An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Bethwell, Claudia
    Sattler, Claudia
    Stachow, Ulrich
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 53
  • [7] A Participatory and Spatial Multicriteria Decision Approach to Prioritize the Allocation of Ecosystem Services to Management Units
    Marques, Marlene
    Reynolds, Keith M.
    Marques, Susete
    Marto, Marco
    Paplanus, Steve
    Borges, Jose G.
    LAND, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [8] Shelterbelt Management Practices for Maximized Ecosystem Carbon Stocks on Agricultural Landscapes in Saskatchewan, Canada
    Amichev, Beyhan
    Laroque, Colin
    Van Rees, Ken
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 68 (04) : 522 - 538
  • [9] Shelterbelt Management Practices for Maximized Ecosystem Carbon Stocks on Agricultural Landscapes in Saskatchewan, Canada
    Beyhan Amichev
    Colin Laroque
    Ken Van Rees
    Environmental Management, 2021, 68 : 522 - 538
  • [10] Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes
    Adhikari, Subodh
    Adhikari, Arjun
    Weaver, David K.
    Bekkerman, Anton
    Menalled, Fabian D.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)