The 'Brussels 4': essential requirements for implantable brain-computer interface user autonomy

被引：0

作者：

Oxley, Thomas J. ^{[1
,2
]}

Deo, Darrel R. ^{[1
,2
]}

Cernera, Stephanie ^{[1
,2
]}

Sawyer, Abbey ^{[3
]}

Putrino, David ^{[3
]}

Ramsey, Nick F. ^{[4
]}

Fry, Adam ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Brain Ctr Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med Neurol & Surg, Parkville, Vic, Australia

[2] Synchron Inc, Brooklyn, NY 11205 USA

[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Rehabil & Human Performance, New York, NY USA

[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecth, UMC Utrecht Brain Ctr, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Utrecth, Netherlands

来源：

JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING | 2025年 / 22卷 / 01期

关键词：

autonomy; BCI; clinical translation; commercialization; intracranial brain-computer interfaces; motor impairment; severe paralysis; POTENTIAL USERS; WANT OPINIONS; HOME-USE; PRIORITIES; PREMOTOR; COMMUNICATION; INDIVIDUALS; ACCEPTANCE; EMERGENCE; PATIENT;

D O I：

10.1088/1741-2552/ada0e6

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Objective. Implantable brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) hold great promise for individuals with severe paralysis and are advancing toward commercialization. The features required for successful clinical translation and patient adoption of iBCIs may be under recognized within traditional academic iBCI research and deserve further consideration. Approach. Here we consider potentially critical factors to achieve iBCI user autonomy, reflecting the authors' perspectives on discussions during various sessions and workshops across the 10th International BCI Society Meeting, Brussels, 2023. Main results. Four key considerations were identified: (1) immediate use, (2) easy to use, (3) continuous use, and (4) stable system use. Significance. Addressing these considerations may enable successful clinical translation of iBCIs.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[31] A Brain-Computer Interface for Robot Navigation
Nawroj, Ahsan I.
Wang, Siyuan
Yu, Yih-Choung
Gabel, Lisa
2012 38TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC), 2012, : 15 - +
[32] Environmental control by a brain-computer interface
Karmali, F
Polak, M
Kostov, A
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 2990 - 2992
[33] Brain-Computer Interface Technology for Schizophrenia
Cothran, Thomas P.
Larson, Jonathon E.
JOURNAL OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 8 (04) : 337 - 340
[34] An auditory brain-computer interface (BCI)
Nijboer, Femke
Furdea, Adrian
Gunst, Ingo
Mellinger, Juergen
McFarland, Dennis J.
Birbaumer, Niels
Kuebler, Andrea
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 167 (01) : 43 - 50
[35] Brain-Computer Interface in Intelligent Environment
Pirog, Pawel
CONTROL, COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 1362 : 212 - 218
[36] Classification of brain-computer interface data
AlZoubi, Omar
Koprinska, Irena
Calvo, Rafael A.
Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, 2008, 87 : 123 - 131
[37] On the efficiency of neurofeedback in the brain-computer interface
Polevaia, S. A.
Fedotchev, A. I.
Savchuk, L. V.
Parin, S. B.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 131 : S141 - S141
[38] A Review of Brain-Computer Interface Technology
Stankevich, Philipp
Spitsyn, Vladimir
2015 INTERNATIONAL SIBERIAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS (SIBCON), 2015,
[39] Linguistic View on Brain-Computer Interface
Timofeeva, Mariya
2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (SIBIRCON), 2015, : 1 - 6
[40] BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE: THE FUTURE IN THE PRESENT
Levitskaya, O. S.
Lebedev, M. A.
BULLETIN OF RUSSIAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2016, (02): : 4 - 15

← 1 2 3 4 5 →