Health Care Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services for People With Disabilities A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Buckley, David I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hsu, Frances [4 ]
Dana, Tracy [4 ]
Blackie, Keeley [4 ]
Holmes, Rebecca [4 ]
Nygren, Peggy [4 ]
Horner-Johnson, Willi [3 ,5 ]
Nicolaidis, Christina [6 ,7 ]
Chou, Roger [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Pacific Northwest Evidence based Practice Ctr, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Pacific Northwest Evidence based Practice Ctr, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Inst Dev & Disabil, Portland, OR USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland State Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR USA
[7] Portland State Univ, Sch Social Work, Portland, OR USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BREAST-CANCER; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS; ADULTS; WOMEN; DISPARITIES; RECEIPT; ADHERENCE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.7326/ANNALS-24-02446
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: People with disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive clinical preventive services. Purpose: To summarize barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services and effectiveness of interventions to improve receipt of preventive services among people with disabilities. Data Sources: Five electronic databases through September 2024. Study Selection: Dual independent screening of abstracts and full texts for 20 recommended preventive services. Data Extraction: Single reviewer, with a second reviewer verifying accuracy. Data Synthesis: Among 11 586 references, 74 studies were included (60 on barriers and facilitators, 16 on interventions, and 2 on both barriers/facilitators and interventions). Most evidence was on screening for breast (n = 48) and cervical (n = 33) cancer. Barriers to and facilitators of breast and cervical cancer screening spanned all disability types and across environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Six randomized controlled trials studied educational interventions for people with physical disabilities (n = 2); cognitive, intellectual, or developmental disabilities (n = 2); sensory disabilities (n = 1); and serious mental illness (n = 1), with mixed findings on effectiveness for different preventive services. Evidence on specific components or harms of interventions was limited. Limitations: High methodological or clinical heterogeneity and limited data for most preventive services and disability types. Conclusion: Barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities are described for breast and cervical cancer screening at the environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Randomized studies on general educational interventions target the patient, the caregiver, and providers of people with specific disabilities. Research is needed on interventions that address barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services for people with disabilities. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol registered at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/people-with-disabilities/protocol)
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of caregiving on preventive care for people with disabilities
    Jamoom, Eric W.
    Andresen, Elena M.
    Neugaard, Britta
    McKune, Sarah L.
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 1 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [22] Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with physical disabilities: A systematic review
    Mlenzana, Nondwe B.
    Frantz, Jose M.
    Rhoda, Anthea J.
    Eide, Arne H.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF DISABILITY, 2013, 2 (01)
  • [23] Transitions from child to adult health care for young people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Brown, Michael
    Macarthur, Juliet
    Higgins, Anna
    Chouliara, Zoe
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (11) : 2418 - 2434
  • [24] Health situation of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature
    Robert, Autoren Griebler
    Ursula, Griebler
    Germain, Weber
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 84 (08/09) : 894 - 894
  • [25] COMPASSIONATE CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES PRESENTING TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    Hassiotis, A.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 726 - 727
  • [26] Access to health care services among people with physical disabilities.
    Shigaki, CL
    Hagglund, KJ
    Nack, M
    Conforti, K
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 43 (02) : 184 - 185
  • [27] Good mental health in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review
    Komenda-Schned, Sophie
    Landskron, Sarah Jasmin
    Moritz, Paula
    Brunevskaya, Nadine
    Santambrogio, Jacopo
    Salvador-Carulla, Luis
    Lueger-Schuster, Brigitte
    Zeilinger, Elisabeth Lucia
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 18 (04) : 954 - 976
  • [28] Health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Bakker-van Gijssel, E.
    Lucassen, P.
    Hartman, T. Olde
    van Son, L.
    Assendelft, P.
    Lantman-de Valk, H. van Schrojenstein
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 633 - 633
  • [29] Health status of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic literature review
    Griebler, U.
    Griebler, R.
    Weber, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32
  • [30] Using clinical audit to improve the quality of mental health-care services for people with learning disabilities
    da Costa, Edward
    Adams, Danielle
    Salmeh, Munzer
    Mahmoud, Omar
    Yetkili, Ekim
    ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 15 (04) : 105 - 118